Ethnikos
Illuminator
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 3,499
From my post you could probably figure out I was interested in camera angles. Most of the actual time I burnt up on the projects was finding photos of the area around the WTC.(I have 1,800 photos in my reference library, on my hard drive, all sorted out) I worked on placing all the buildings and working out where the different videos and photos were taken from. I was able to debunk a whole mess of conspiracy type videos you can find in abundance on youtube. There are people who have this idea that all the video was made in some master computer and that they fed in information to produce what they wanted to put out. They claim that you can find discrepancies in the videos and that some were impossible to have been made, and that some were swapped out and changed to look like they were shot from another location.Ummm, critical thinking and YouTube are odd cousins indeed. Out of curiosity, what kind of videos were those 14 that you posted on YouTube?
I also got into what the actual affects on the environment that a big plane would make, and kind of took care of the no-plane notion, by showing that they are visible in the tapes.
I went from one to the other and pointed out how they were wrong. I got into a couple text conversations with some very angry and hostile video makers who did not like me exposing their flawed theories.(this was not my original intent, finding hoaxes, it just happened through my learning)
I was a little obsessed about the whole 9/11 thing because of what happened in my story. My theory is that a movie was made before hand as a backup just in case there was not a real one available to show live. (The ones that were shown live were from local station traffic choppers and were not clear enough to give the true impact quality of what happened.) Of course I do not have any evidence and that is not in my videos. It is just the motivation behind my own research.