Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?

unfounded? wow let me guess u believe that lee harvey oswald acted alone killed kennedy with his magical bullets that turn corners, shot him from behind yet the bullet struck jfk in the front causing his head to whip back and to the left, and that the ss agents that abandoned the car were just confused, and that the driver slowed down the car to 5mph just as kennedy is shot for no reason, and that the witnesses running towards the grassy knowl were chasing a ghost, And that Kennedy firing the heads of all the intelligece agencies, and opposing terror plots to induce war with cuba had nothing to do with his death, and that the speech he gave denouncing secret societies and operations and how he would fight them had nothing to do with his death, and that jfk`s brain goes missing during the autopsy was not because it would prove the official story wrong but was a coincidence.

Do you believe every single story that your govt tell you?
willingly ignorant is how i shall describe you.

yay yay government is soo well and good, looking out for the citizens, never telling a lie, never commiting any crime whatsoever they`re just soo perfect. yayayayayayaya lets trust the u.s govt and believe everything they say, if they tell us that the sky is blue because it is reflecting off of invisible blue pixie dust produced by little fairies floating around then it must be true and every1 should believe it and if you dont you are crazy!

It would help your arguments if you stayed a little more focused, you're all over the map.

The fact is that most on this forum do not believe everything our government says, some don't even live in this country. You do realize that the Bush Administration has a 30% approval rating, so it is more likely that a forum member would scrutinize the government more carefully. What most members on this forum require is corroborative, credible evidence, not wild speculations from quack conspiracy sites. So if you can provide this type of evidence, we're all ears, unfortunately you have failed to provide any.
 
all you need is to watch the zapruder film taken of the event to KNOW that the shot came from the front.

You determine this by what ballistics expertise? I'd really like to know what bullet makes brain matter spray towards the sniper.

Oh wait, let me guess 'Back-and-to-the-left-back-and-to-the-left' is all you need.
 
You have been fooled by the movie JFK. You really shuld check out the documentary the history channel did that showed how it all really went down. You MIGHT change your mind (I did) but I doubt it.

They do a great job explaining it all.

Watch the Z film VERY closely...."Back and to the left" is not accurate.

YOU`RE IN DENIAL! LOL back to the left not accurate thats hilarious are you a comedian? spare the
Edited by LibraryLady: 
Edited for Rule 10
for someone a little more gullible.

Please do not circumvent the autocensor.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:
all you need is to watch the zapruder film taken of the event to KNOW that the shot came from the front. Therefore the official story is a crock of lies and **** rubbish crap that you enjoy soo much.
You are unable to understand what happen on JFK, and 9/11. You are a CTer to the heart, you love fiction, you hate the facts and evidence. Your magic bullet junk has been refuted so many times. When I visited Dallas and sat in the window, I know your junk is pure fiction. You have not done any JFK research but to spew "JFK" movie junk. Funny.

7 years and you have zero evidence for 9/11.
 
they shut the mayor of cleveland up quick, im surprised they didn't kill him for almost blowing the lid off their plan.


What about the people at the airport? What about all the passengers of Flight Delta that actually did land there?


is everyone in on it?
 
YOU`RE IN DENIAL! LOL back to the left not accurate thats hilarious are you a comedian? spare the bullshyt for someone a little more gullible.

I have an experiment for you to do. Tilt your head all the way forward so your chin is tucked. Have you friend punch you in the back of the head as hard as he can. Your head because it is extended al the way forward will bounce back toward your friend.

Watch the video closely and you will see the initial movement of his head go forward and THEN snap back.

Try it out....you may learn something and if not, you got a good punch to the back of the head.
 
Last edited:
OMG, it's 2003 all over again. Next we're going to be getting the "Fat Bin Laden" thrown in.

checkitb4uwreckit ,

If the Pod is the best evidence for the TM, why did most of them drop it in 2005 and why did Avery deliberately remove it from LC ed 2 claiming it was bogus?
 
calling the JFK CTs unfounded seems to have struck a nerve, sorry for having unleashed all of this
 
calling the JFK CTs unfounded seems to have struck a nerve, sorry for having unleashed all of this

Sometimes calling the crazies crazy really brings out they truly are. If nothing else his tantrums can serve as an example of 'This is your brain on CTs'.

Wish I could find that thread on Howard Hunt. Its amazing what turns up when 'Fake skeptics' actually do research and find out little 1 sentence CT claims don't tell even a part of the whole story.
 
It must be frustrating to believe certain things but be unable to prove them, or even effectively argue them. This meltdown was brought to you by our friendly neighborhood school system.
 
I've moved a bunch of posts to AAH and will be alerting the Administrators as to the problem in this thread.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Okay, so I was replying to a post and while I was typing it seems a flame war occured and my hard work ended up being posted to the AAH section, so I'm reposting here where it was supposed to be. The actual question I was replying too, before the bit that got it AAH'ed, seemed to me to be a fair question, if a rather ignorant one.

let me ask this has the U.S govt ever lied about anything, ever committed a crime, or ever done anything wrong EVER?

All politicians lie, and I'd have to say that the illegal phone taping was criminal, as was the outing of Valerie Plame Wilson as a covert CIA agent (it's questionable if there was more than just one person involved in that or if he threw himself on his sword to save a higher up.)

Does that mean that everything the US Government says is a lie, or that they always commit crime, no, each action needs to be taken on the merits of its own evidence.

Just because Bush and co over-emphasized the WMD's in Iraq Intell and minimised the Intel that said there wasn't, or that what they were being told was dodgy, doesn't mean they lied about 9/11. (In fact it also doesn't mean that Saddam didn't have WMDs, one of his own Generals claimed they shipped them out to Syria right before the invasion and there is always the question, if Saddam really had nothing to hide, why did he allow the invasion to occur? He could have stopped it simply by allowing the UN inspectors to restart their work without hindrance. Why did he allow his regime to be toppled over... well nothing? That doesn't make any sense at all...)

The final issue is this... What part of the US Government are we talking? Personally I think Bush is a genetically engineered Chimp and Cheney isn't that far behind, but at the same time there are thousands of people who work for the Federal Government that were there before Clinton took office and will be there long after Obama is a footnote in history. They certainly aren't Bush loyalists and most of them tend to resent the Whitehouse getting in their way no matter who is in charge. Do we tar them with the same brush simply because they are part of the Federal Government? If not, then regardless of what you think about Bush and his posse of loons, you suddenly find that the Whitehouse has nothing to do with the "official story". Most of it was put together by over 7,000 FBI agents that worked on the case. Further parts were established by the FAA, NYPD, FDNY, NTSB, NIST, FEMA, are they all in on it? How about United and American Airlines? They aren't even part of the US Government. Did you know that the two airlines have the ability to use an onboard tracking system to determine where their planes are and when they take off and land? Did you know that while everyone else was trying to determine what flights had hit the WTC that UA and AA knew and it was them that advised the FAA as to the identity of the planes? If the planes weren't AA11, UA175, AA77 and UA93 are you saying that the Airline staff were lying about it? Where they in on it? Did they deliberately send their colleagues to their deaths and their companies in near bankruptcy (UA) and actual bankruptcy (AA)?

You have to note that already we're into the tens of thousands of people needing to be in on it, and we haven't even covered the thousands of volunteers, police, firecrews, customs agents and others that spent weeks and months scouring through the debris of WTC 1, 2, 3 & 7, the Pentagon, and the crash site near Shanksville looking for evidence. How does a conspiracy that large hold together for 7 years when the national media get told all about hanky-panky in the Oval office that involved a grand total of just two people within months of it happening?

Try putting your hate of Bush and anti-war feelings to one side for a moment and think a little rationally.
 
Last edited:
He'll be missed.
patriot.gif
 
Hmmmm. checkitb4uwreckit gets banned, then almost immediately the super secret spy agent guy, ULTIMA1 starts posting. Hmmmm.
 

Back
Top Bottom