Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?

checkitb4uwreckit said:
this is the second time on here where you guys just criticize spelling errors that mean nothing to avoid the issue being discussed. Says a lot.
Click to expand...


You're presenting easily debunked evidence. I gave the explanation. You choose to rely on one dubious study which used the same terrible pictures the rest of us have seen and declare it proof. You do this despite the fact it's impossible to reach any tangible conclusions because of shrinkage, blurring, and the hosts of other problems which render it useless for scientific analysis. And you do this despite having to know the complete lack of merit the Spanish study has for the very reasons listed above.

We're not avoiding it. It's just that evidence is so poor there's little to say further about it, therefore the irony of your comment about intelligence was all there was left to focus on. :p
 
checkitb4uwreckit said:
this is the second time on here where you guys just criticize spelling errors that mean nothing to avoid the issue being discussed. Says a lot.
Click to expand...

Dude, if you misspell a word or use bad grammar, expect to get called on it. See, most people here are omni-talented. They can both address the issue and correct your spelling or grammar. (Yeah, I know. Talented people, huh?) Poor spelling and grammar isn't meaningless. This is a message board, not an AOL instant message session. A lot of times it makes posts difficult to read and unintelligible where people can't understand your point about "the issue being discussed." Quit crying and start communicating like an adult...assuming you're an adult. If you're in junior high school, accept my apologies and study harder in your English and composition courses.


As an aside, what's with the sudden influx of truthers? Is JREF advertising on CT forums?
 
Last edited:
checkitb4uwreckit said:
the plane that hit the south tower had an extra piece of equipment attatched to the bottom and produced a large flash in line with it BEFORE it entered the building. An even larger flash was created from the plane that crashed into the north tower. This proves that those werent commercial flights; and since those planes werent flight 175 and 11 then how could it have been terrorists with box cutters?
Click to expand...

Show me this proof ?
 
checkitb4uwreckit said:
show me this proof.
Click to expand...

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path_%20Study_AA11.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path%20_Study_UA175.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/ATC%20_Report_UA175.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/ATC_%20Report_AA11.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Rec_Radar_%20Data_%20Study_all%20_aircraft.pdf

Now as you think they were military aircraft, what type and what weapons were in the pod?

I am ex airforce, I know lots about military aircraft. What squadron do you think gave away 2 of their aircraft that cost millions of dollars to let them be crashed into the towers? Who flew them? Who modified them?

Please provide your large list of witness who claim it was not a commercial flight?
 
funk de fino said:
http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path_%20Study_AA11.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_%20Path%20_Study_UA175.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/ATC%20_Report_UA175.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/ATC_%20Report_AA11.pdf

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Rec_Radar_%20Data_%20Study_all%20_aircraft.pdf

Now as you think they were military aircraft, what type and what weapons were in the pod?

I am ex airforce, I know lots about military aircraft. What squadron do you think gave away 2 of their aircraft that cost millions of dollars to let them be crashed into the towers? Who flew them? Who modified them?

Please provide your large list of witness who claim it was not a commercial flight?
Click to expand...

all those links u listed have .gov on them and you actually expect me to trust them?

asking what squadron gave away their planes is stupid. as for who flew them well that is obvious. Remote control which explains the peculiar accuracy. Why was there a govt military doomsday plane flying around manhattan b4 the planes hit?

this is funny all the questions you ask can only be known by the people who planned this, asking me is a little bit ridiculous dont you think?

thats why a new investigation is needed.
 
Check out "Jeff Rense Program" for a pained laugh.

from the site:

"Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein."
 
Last edited:
Crazytimes said:
Are you being serious with this ? or are you trying to prove a point ?

Please tell me you don't really think this is true.
Click to expand...

Absolute proof of my assertion that all it takes to convince most CTs of something is that they see it posted on a website.
 
you state `no they did not` like your the ultimate authority and know this. So your saying the mayor of cleveland just claimed that flight 175 and 11 landed there for no reason. He just made it up? lol ok.
 
checkitb4uwreckit said:
all those links u listed have .gov on them and you actually expect me to trust them?

asking what squadron gave away their planes is stupid. as for who flew them well that is obvious. Remote control which explains the peculiar accuracy. Why was there a govt military doomsday plane flying around manhattan b4 the planes hit?

this is funny all the questions you ask can only be known by the people who planned this, asking me is a little bit ridiculous dont you think?

thats why a new investigation is needed.
Click to expand...

they are from the NTSB, you do know who they are dont you?

They take there data from numerous sources that are listed in the reports.

Where did the military bad boys come from? Rmote control of these types of planes is not possible. Even if it was it would be less accurate than a real pilot.

There is no such thing as a doomsday plane.

You askd for proof and i gave it and now you have posted to links which do not say what you say they do and actually back up what I said about the airlines.
 
checkitb4uwreckit said:
you state `no they did not` like your the ultimate authority and know this. So your saying the mayor of cleveland just claimed that flight 175 and 11 landed there for no reason. He just made it up? lol ok.
Click to expand...

Check again. You claimed 93 and 175. The links says 93, it does not claim 175 and 11 landed anywhere. The flight 93 did not land in cleveland and no-one claimed 175 and 11 did anyway

If you are going to link to a CT liars site then ate least read the page first.

Feeling foolish yet?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom