WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Did any military planes go missing that day?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?
- Thread starter Crazytimes
- Start date
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,821
Does it matter? You're already on record thinking them all to be liars. You probably wouldn't believe anything they told you anyway.
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
Why does one need a background in aviation to tell the planes apart? I don't have one and I can tell them apart. I bet you any one else on this board, even those that have never been in a plane can tell them apart.
I would note, again, that the identification of the planes was not from the NYPD or the FDNY, but rather United Airlines and American Airlines. Where they lying when they informed the FAA that Flight UA175 and Flight AA11 had hit the WTC towers? Where they mistaking 757s or 767s for the military version? Did they somehow misplace their multi-million dollar planes? Do they not have backgrounds in avaition? BTW, if your research and background are as grand as you claim then you should know without being told how the airlines knew that it was their planes that hit the WTC and how they knew virtually immediately.
No, i do not believe anyone, thats why i do research, and e-mail people that were there.
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
Four. UA claims to have lost 2 of them, a Boeing 767-200ER tail number N612UA and a Boeing 757-200 tail number N591UA. AA claims to have lost 2 as well, a Boeing 767-223ER tail number N334AA and a Boeing 757-223 tail number N644AA. They also claim that these planes hit the WTC Towers 1 and 2, the Pentagon and a Field near Shasnksville, Penn. ARE THEY LYING?
I donlt know, are they? I mean we do not have most of the information needed to know what really happened that day.
Funny though that the FAA registration site has some planes as being detroyed and one as just being cancelled.
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
We don't have evidence they informed the FAA, or that the planes crashed? If the planes didn't crash and they told the FAA they did, then they were lying, they had systems onboard that told them exactly where their planes were. If they didn't tell the FAA then they are lying about it when they say they did. So are they lying? They are either lying or telling the truth. If they are telling the truth, then Flight AA11 hit WTC 1, Flight UA175 hit WTC 2, Flight AA77 hit the Pentagon and Flight UA93 crashed near Shanksville, if they aren't telling the truth, well then they must be lying and in on it all.
Which is it?
We do not have much evidence of anything that day.
Funny how the FAA and FBI refuse to relaese serial numbers though.
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 21,203
We have just as much evidence that the moon exists or that WWII happened.
And if it was some huge consipracy now including both the FAA and the FBI, they couldn't just look up the numbers and release those as the ones on the parts they found?
Zipster
Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
- Messages
- 178
Well there's your problem right there! If you don't believe anyone as you state, how can you be sure that whatever you're looking as is true?
Do you do everything first-hand? Have you actually done the tests of the engineers you use as sources? Do you personally interview all the witnesses in the articles you post?
You have to eventually believe someone down the line. Or could the whole world just be a massive conspiracy?
Failure again.
Evidence is there, you ignore it out of willful ignorance and you want to post lies and false information. If you call the RADAR data not evince you prove you are just troll
If you prove the RADAR is false you have a Pulitzer Prize.
There is RADAR data placing 11 and 175 at the WTC, the eyes do the rest.
You lack the ability to analysis this? Fact less and evidence free, what do you have?
Last edited:
Where do you get this silly stuff from?
You present evidence that debunks your claims. You say Al planes can't cut steel, then you show flesh and blood cutting Al planes. Neat to see some humor as your logic backfires.
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/aa77/77.htm
Oops the FBI says 77 was in the Pentagon, it crashed. Oops, you lied again, they say it was 77, that includes all the parts and serial numbers associated with 77.... logic, research skills, or is this a disinformation campaign by the NSA sending their top analyst, you?, to spread false information?
Please go to all the news agencies and tell them you think the FBI is making up 77 stuff, and give them your massive pile of vapor evidence; you will be the most famous NSA analyst ever.
Last edited:
MIKILLINI
Incromulent Logic
- Joined
- May 3, 2007
- Messages
- 2,979
So far, you haven't provided anything substantial or compelling regarding your position on 9/11.
If you believe that statement is wrong, then prove to Me how it's wrong.
Last edited:
You have a background in aviation? Excellent--you'll explain why air trafic controllers claimed to track United Flight 175 right to the doorstep of the WTC complex. As your fantasy requires (doesn't it?) that it didn't actually hit the building, you can tell us what happened to the people on it, some of whose remains were identified at the crash site.
Well i do something called research, file FOIA requests and e-mail people and companies to get facts and evidence.
Thats how i find out what is true.
Please read post before responding, makes you look really childish.
Specailly when i never stated a plane did not hit the building.
I guess alot more then you and others since i can post facts and evidence to support what i post and you and others cannot.