Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?

PhantomWolf said:
So the NYPD were lying to me when they told me that what I was looking at was a piece of plane recovered from Ground Zero?
Click to expand...

But do firemen know the doifference between airliners?

Can they tell the difference between 757 and a 767, or if its a military version or civilian?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
But do firemen know the doifference between airliners?

Can they tell the difference between 757 and a 767, or if its a military version or civilian?
Click to expand...

Apart from the fact 757's and 767's look quite different, what have firemen got to do with the NYPD? In fact what have they got to do with anything to do with the planes? The FDNY didn't identify the planes; United Airlines and American Airlines did, or were they lying too, and have been lying for the last 7 years?

So let's see, so far you seem to be heading down the track that the NYPD is lying, the FDNY are lying, United Airlines and American Airlines are lying. What's really sad is that all of these groups lost a large number of employees that day, but you are sitting there brazenly calling their colleagues and friends a bunch of liars.

You refuse to help people facing the death penalty who you think are scapegoats. You refuse to give evidence to lawyers who could test it in court; you call the friends and co-workers of the victims of the day a bunch of liars. Can you get more contemptible? Actually don't bother answering that, I already know and I'm going to bed.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
But do firemen know the doifference between airliners?

Can they tell the difference between 757 and a 767, or if its a military version or civilian?
Click to expand...

Well, if you see a 767 with the UA paint scheme crash into the South Tower, and you see the plane parts scattered across Manhattan, it doesn't take a genius to figure out the rest.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Has anyone on here done any reaserch without thier keyboard?

I mean i have access to a lot of resources that most people do not have.
Click to expand...

This is why the lie about your occupation is so absurd- you want us to believe that you have top secret access... you want us to believe that you're skilled in researching...

but when asked to provide evidence, you post a link to the home page of the FBI website...

Even your FOIA requests are done through Internet forms.

You are no researcher.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The ensuing fire was clearly the principal cause of the collapse
Click to expand...

Is English not your first language? The word "principal" means "first of more than one". This statement, therefore, makes it clear that there were other causes than fire, otherwise it would have said "The ensuing fire was clearly the sole cause of collapse". Reading this sentence in context, the report is clear that the collapse was due to a combination of fire and impact damage, but that in this case the author felt that the fire was the greatest cause. This is therefore an article that supports my position and contradicts yours, whatever rather obvious attempts you may make to misrepresent it.

By idiotic articles, I mean the ones that claim something other than fire and/or impact damage as a cause of collapse.

Dave
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The fact that you cannot post any facts or evidence proves what a joke you really are.
Click to expand...

You make this accusation like it actually means something. You've never asked for any specific evidence, nor have you provided any to support your claims.

All you do is repeat the slogan "you haven't posted any evidence" as if it's supposed to be meaningful in the context of you being a new arrival without any sort of an argument that you're responding to.
 
Totovader said:
You make this accusation like it actually means something. You've never asked for any specific evidence, nor have you provided any to support your claims.
Click to expand...

Thanks for proving my point, since i have posted evidence. But you have not.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Thanks for proving my point, since i have posted evidence. But you have not.
Click to expand...

Thanks for chopping up another one of my posts and completely ignoring my point... thus proving my point.

Tell you what- quote even one time where you asked me for a specific piece of evidence and I refused to provide it or retract my claims and I will pay you $100 paypal right now.
 
Totovader said:
Tell you what- quote even one time where you asked me for a specific piece of evidence and I refused to provide it or retract my claims and I will pay you $100 paypal right now.
Click to expand...


Well the fact you have not posted any facts or evidence to debate or discuss what i have posted proves my point.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am just trying to find the facts. Seems like most people on here cannot pot even basic fats and evidence.
Click to expand...

And you don't think that it is a basic fact that the 767-200 and the 757-200 look totally different?

Here let me help. Do these planes look the same to you? (other than their obvious paint jobs)

1557948e7af35e5b47.jpg

1557948e7af84c0b21.jpg


By the way, have you rung Captain Prince yet?
 
Last edited:
PhantomWolf said:
And you don't think that it is a basic fact that the 767-200 and the 757-200 look totally different?
Click to expand...

Yes i do know the differce, i have a background in aviation.

Does the NYPD or FDNY have a background in avaition to be able to tell you the type of plane it was and if it civilian or military version?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom