London Truthers to demonstrate on 9/11

[funk de fino]

I would like the claimant to provide evidence for their claim that the suspects were almost immediately named. This is one of the reasons they have claimed they think possible false flag.

If it shown to be a false claim then it removes one of the crucial doubt they have. We have already shown some other of those doubts to be from false claims.

How about it JJ?

 

[JihadJane]

I would like the claimant to provide evidence for their claim that the suspects were almost immediately named. This is one of the reasons they have claimed they think possible false flag.

If it shown to be a false claim then it removes one of the crucial doubt they have. We have already shown some other of those doubts to be from false claims.

How about it JJ?

Ooh! You've gone all judgey now. What happened to the mind reader?

I will get around to your urgent enquiries but, really, what's the rush?

BTW, are you still claiming that manc's pics are "evidence"of the alleged bombers' presence in London on 7/7/05.

Did you read the book as well?

Did you find your twooferometer. Is he one of them
?

 

[funk de fino]

Ooh! You've gone all judgey now. What happened to the mind reader?

I will get around to your urgent enquiries but, really, what's the rush?

BTW, are you still claiming that manc's pics are "evidence"of the alleged bombers' presence in London on 7/7/05.

Did you read the book as well?

Did you find your twooferometer. Is he one of them
?

You made claims as to why you think it may have been a false flag. Now we see that some of your claims are false and you cannot back up the others. How about you tell us about the almost immediate naming of suspects? This is one of your big one? You must know when that happened right?

Mancmans pics are official releases from CCTV of Hussain in Kings Cross and Luton on 7/7. It places him there. It could not have been the dummy run on 28th June as he was not involved.

If you had paid attention to my posts you would see I have read the paper you linked me too and i have yet to see anywhere in it that proves a relationship between the bombers and the security services. Please link to that part after you have answered my questions please?

So tell us why this does not place him in London on 7/7? (with the same clothes and rucksack he is wearing in the timestamped Luton CCTV images?)

Who benefitted from the possible false flag?

Stop running JJ. It looks bad.

 

[funk de fino]

Did you find your twooferometer. Is he one of them

Whats all that at the side of his wiki page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_on_Freedom

And yes, I have seen stuff he has written and it has the mark of woo.

He repeats truther lies.

 

[JihadJane]

Mancmans pics are official releases from CCTV of Hussain in Kings Cross and Luton on 7/7. It places him there. It could not have been the dummy run on 28th June as he was not involved.

They don't place him there on 7/7. Perhaps he was shopping. He seems pretty relaxed as do other people in the image, supposedly taken at a time when Kings Cross was being evacuated.

Without time stamps these images cannot be presented as evidence about timing.

If you had paid attention to my posts you would see I have read the paper you linked me too and i have yet to see anywhere in it that proves a relationship between the bombers and the security services.

Yes, I noticed, but I wasn't very impressedby your review. I was asking about his book. I think you need to take a less black and white, blinkered approach. Get off your woo hobby horse for a while.

So tell us why this does not place him in London on 7/7? (with the same clothes and rucksack he is wearing in the timestamped Luton CCTV images?)

Do you change your clothes every day? How many rucksacks have you got in your wardrobe?

Who benefitted from the possible false flag?

See below.Big list coming!

Stop running JJ. It looks bad.

Stop remote viewing. It looks obsessive and a bit mad.

...it has the mark of woo

Phew! That means you can ignore everything he says and can cancel your appointment with the Witchfinder General.

 

[funk de fino]

They don't place him there on 7/7. Perhaps he was shopping. He seems pretty relaxed as do other people in the image, supposedly taken at a time when Kings Cross was being evacuated.

How do you know what time it was?

Without time stamps these images cannot be presented as evidence about timing.

Goalpost shift. Evidence has been released showing one of the bombers in London on 7/7. You just do not believe it to be good enough.

Yes, I noticed, but I wasn't very impressedby your review. I was asking about his book. I think you need to take a less black and white, blinkered approach. Get off your woo hobby horse for a while.

You said it detailed relationships bwteen the bombers and the security services. It does not. please show me where it does. It looks like it is his woo hobbyhorse.

Do you change your clothes every day? How many rucksacks have you got in your wardrobe?

yes, and three

See below.Big list coming!

another impossibly vast conspiracy then?

Stop remote viewing. It looks obsessive and a bit mad.

Stop running and stop making silly posts

Phew! That means you can ignore everything he says and can cancel your appointment with the Witchfinder General.

He is a truther who repeats lies.

Please answer the questions about almost immediately named suspects? Why are you runing away from this?

 

[JihadJane]

How do you know what time it was?

I don't but the claimed time was reported in the media.

Goalpost shift. Evidence has been released showing one of the bombers in London on 7/7. You just do not believe it to be good enough.

That's because it isn't good enough. There is no indication of when the pictures were taken and, in one, barely any indication of where, therefore it isn't evidence that the bomber was in London on the day of the attacks.

You said it detailed relationships bwteen the bombers and the security services. It does not. please show me where it does. It looks like it is his woo hobbyhorse.

Chapter 3

yes, and three

You are wealthy indeed but I hope you understand my point, nevertheless.

another impossibly vast conspiracy then?

Why should people who benefit from war be part of any "vast conspiracy"? Wars, however they are started, are very good for business. It's mostly economics. Step out of your conspiracy theory straight-jacket!

Stop running and stop making silly posts.

This is is an example of what I regard to be a silly post. You stop, I'll stop.

He is a truther who repeats lies.

It seems that your somewhat paranoid definition of a lie is anything that differs from your beliefs.

Please answer the questions about almost immediately named suspects? Why are you runing away from this?

Another example, IMO, of a silly post.

Playground taunts and testeronic hectoring only stimulate my fly-swatting reflex. I have outlined my intended question-answering program above, partly based on other posters' questions as well as your own. It's democracy!

 

[funk de fino]

Its difficult to run fast with goalposts on your back but you are proving very adept.

When were the suspects almost immediately named?

I predict more running after evidence is shown after the court case. You just need to go to some of your guys papers and read the lies. They are there in blank and white.

Truly pathetic. This thread says it all about you lot.

 

[JihadJane]

Its difficult to run fast with goalposts on your back but you are proving very adept.

When were the suspects almost immediately named?

I predict more running after evidence is shown after the court case. You just need to go to some of your guys papers and read the lies. They are there in blank and white.

Truly pathetic. This thread says it all about you lot.

"you lot"?

 

[funk de fino]

"you lot"?

yes

When were the suspects almost immediately named?

Its not difficult.

 

[JihadJane]

yes

When were the suspects almost immediately named?

Its not difficult.

When I mentioned that "playground taunts and testeronic hectoring" "stimulate my fly-swatting reflex" I should also have added "repeating the same question over and over again".

 

[funk de fino]

When I mentioned that "playground taunts and testeronic hectoring" "stimulate my fly-swatting reflex" I should also have added "repeating the same question over and over again".

Almost as childish as running away again and again

 

[funk de fino]

Ok, I can make it easier for you JJ. How about a multiple choice?

Which of the folowing do you consider to be "almost immediate" as you used it?

A - 1 day
B - 2 days
C - 1 Week
D - Over a week but less than 2
E - All of the above
F - None of the above

C'mon it raised your suspicions of a possibility of a false flag. You must remember how fast you thought it was?

 

[jhunter1163]

JJ, how soon would you expect it to be if it wasn't a false flag?

 

[JihadJane]

Almost as childish as running away again and again

It is interesting that you are possessed by hallucinations of predator and prey. A more useful analogy might be breastfeeeding or sex. What you perceive as pursuit I perceive as desperate begging.

Ok, I can make it easier for you JJ. How about a multiple choice?

Many thanks for your helpful questionaire. How kind of you! I'll put it in my "answering funk de fino's urgent questions" file.

JJ, how soon would you expect it to be if it wasn't a false flag?

Thanks for your question, jhunter. I am working on the cui bono question at the moment so will file your question with fdf's for later attention. Hope you've got enough troofer juice to keep you going in the meantime.

 

[funk de fino]

It is interesting that you are possessed by hallucinations of predator and prey. A more useful analogy might be breastfeeeding or sex. What you perceive as pursuit I perceive as desperate begging.



Many thanks for your helpful questionaire. How kind of you! I'll put it in my "answering funk de fino's urgent questions" file.



Thanks for your question, jhunter. I am working on the cui bono question at the moment so will file your question with fdf's for later attention. Hope you've got enough troofer juice to keep you going in the meantime.

You seem to have plenty time to post amd make smart mouth comments and supposed insults but not to answer basic questions on some of your main concerns. Says it all really. Carry on, you get less credible by the day.

 

[JihadJane]

You seem to have plenty time to post amd make smart mouth comments and supposed insults but not to answer basic questions on some of your main concerns. Says it all really. Carry on, you get less credible by the day.

Time is irrelevant. I pursue my interests at my leisure.

I have already outlined my question-answering intentions, above. Please read them again.

Repetitive, testeronic proddings will merely prolong your agony and delay your hoped-for consummation. I am bewildered that you appear to believe otherwise.

 

[funk de fino]

Time is irrelevant. I pursue my interests at my leisure.

I have already outlined my question-answering intentions, above. Please read them again.

Repetitive, testeronic proddings will merely prolong your agony and delay your hoped-for consummation. I am bewildered that you appear to believe otherwise.

Translation for lurkers - I cannot find any thing to support my remaining concerns regarding 7/7 and any answers I give to the questions raised, will mean eating a huge slice of humble pie. I would rather avoid while trying to look intelligent and grown up.

 

[Foolmewunz]

When I mentioned that "playground taunts and testeronic hectoring" "stimulate my fly-swatting reflex" I should also have added "repeating the same question over and over again".

Maybe you need to get a can of bug spray, then, because your fly-swatting is nothing more than false bravado and condescension. I've seen no fly-swatting taking place around this thread, although your entire approach emits a certain odor bound to attract any number of the little critters.

The mere act of taking days to answer simple questions does not elevate you to automatic inclusion in the intelligentsia. It just provides evidence of your inordinately slow research skills and inability to come up with anyone who agrees with you except you. (The CE tries variations of this coffe-shop-gitanes-smoking-armchair-revolutionary gambit all the time. It doesn't work for him/her, either.)

ETA: And the person or institution to benefit from the false flag operation was ____________ ?

 

[JihadJane]

Translation for lurkers - I cannot find any thing to support my remaining concerns regarding 7/7 and any answers I give to the questions raised, will mean eating a huge slice of humble pie. I would rather avoid while trying to look intelligent and grown up.

I do understand that it is humble pie that you hunger for, above all else!


I've got nothing against Remote Viewing experiments per se, but they probably belong inthe paranormal sub-forum.

Maybe you need to get a can of bug spray, then, because your fly-swatting is nothing more than false bravado and condescension. I've seen no fly-swatting taking place around this thread, although your entire approach emits a certain odor bound to attract any number of the little critters.

You misunderstand. I haven't used my flyswatter, just that fdf's rude impatience stimulates the reflex to use it and encourages, indeed makes it pleasurable, for me not to attend to his/her questions in a hurry.

The mere act of taking days to answer simple questions does not elevate you to automatic inclusion in the intelligentsia. It just provides evidence of your inordinately slow research skills and inability to come up with anyone who agrees with you except you. (The CE tries variations of this coffe-shop-gitanes-smoking-armchair-revolutionary gambit all the time. It doesn't work for him/her, either.)

Another Remote Viewer?

I'm afraid I'm not familair with "The CE".

ETA: And the person or institution to benefit from the false flag operation was ____________ ?

In the plural. See below.