Truthers...what is your best piece of evidence ?

Dictator Cheney said:
when all the debunkings and countertheories didnt convince, i would say it was a little to optimistic of you :)
Click to expand...

When all debunking of counter-theories fails to make you realize how atrocious these counter-theories are, then you're holding on to false hope. Good luck with that.
 
AZCat said:
Who has ever claimed otherwise? Even the NIST calls it a hypothesis. Even if the NIST had all the remnants of WTC 7 and they were clearly marked as to location they would still only be able to produce a collapse hypothesis.
Click to expand...


I wish that were possible, and we could in fact have seen where that took us.
 
Still nothing....this is great. I find it hilarious that truthers use small, strange oddities from the most chaotic day in american history and turn that into evidence of an inside job.
 
roundhead said:
I wish that were possible, and we could in fact have seen where that took us.
Click to expand...

It would not have taken us anywhere. The structure of WTC 7 was not labeled in the same manner as the towers, so determining the initial location of the various pieces would not have been possible. Nor would it help much to know the final state of a highly nonlinear event.
 
Crazytimes said:
Still nothing....this is great. I find it hilarious that truthers use small, strange oddities from the most chaotic day in american history and turn that into evidence of an inside job.
Click to expand...

I find it hilarious that people can still believe the official story even though most of the real evidence has not been released and the evidence that has been released questions the official story.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I find it hilarious that people can still believe the official story even though most of the real evidence has not been released and the evidence that has been released questions the official story.
Click to expand...

What evidence questions the "official story"? Please be specific.
 
dtugg said:
What evidence questions the "official story"? Please be specific.
Click to expand...

Well where to start.

1. The FDR from AA77 shows a different flight path then the official story.

2. A NIST report states that NIST failed to recover steel from building 7 for testing, so the NIST final report on building 7 is not a properly investigated report.

3. Several articels and agency reports disagree with the NIST report on the cause of the towers collapse.

4. Reports show that the FBI only spent 5 days working the Pentagon crime scene after stating it would take a month.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well where to start.

1. The FDR from AA77 shows a different flight path then the official story.

2. A NIST report states that NIST failed to recover steel from building 7 for testing, so the NIST final report on building 7 is not a properly investigated report.

3. Several articels and agency reports disagree with the NIST report on the cause of the towers collapse.

4. Reports show that the FBI only spent 5 days working the Pentagon crime scene after stating it would take a month.
Click to expand...

Normally, you can't just say stuff and expect us to believe you. Do you have any legitimate evidence that supports your statements?
 
twinstead said:
Normally, you can't just say stuff and expect us to believe you. Do you have any legitimate evidence that supports your statements?
Click to expand...

Yes but i cannot post the URLs right now because i do not have my 15 posts yet.
 
Last edited:
Ultima1 I can't be sure, but I think some things you accept as rock-solid evidence may not be so rock solid. If you bring anything new to the table we are all ears, but I suspect you will be bring up links and claims that have been dealt with here a thousand times before.
 
twinstead said:
Ultima1 I can't be sure, but I think some things you accept as rock-solid evidence may not be so rock solid. If you bring anything new to the table we are all ears, but I suspect you will be bring up links and claims that have been dealt with here a thousand times before.
Click to expand...

Well i can show FOIA requests i have filed and e-mails i have sent.

I can post material from government and professional research sites.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well i can show FOIA requests i have filed and e-mails i have sent.

I can post material from government and professional research sites.
Click to expand...
That means you have no evidence to support your preposterous fantasies about 9/11. Zip.

Just talk works at web sites looking for woo! Evidence is the coin of the realm you should use here or suffer the fate of fools gone before you.

But you have no evidence, just confess you push hearsay and standard fantasy of shoot downs, no planes et al.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well where to start.

1. The FDR from AA77 shows a different flight path then the official story.

2. A NIST report states that NIST failed to recover steel from building 7 for testing, so the NIST final report on building 7 is not a properly investigated report.

3. Several articels and agency reports disagree with the NIST report on the cause of the towers collapse.

4. Reports show that the FBI only spent 5 days working the Pentagon crime scene after stating it would take a month.
Click to expand...
Wow, the FDR shows the exact heading for impact! Wrong 1

WTC7 burnt all day and fell, it was expected, nothing to do with 9/11, except for fantasy ideas of woo and fantasy. This proves you to be a pure fantasy believe no way to tie 7 to anything more than a fantasy in your mind. Wrong 2

Impact, Fire, Failure. No all the professional sources but 9/11 truth false experts agree. Wrong 3

Wow, you mean after 5 days they figured out 77 impacted the Pentagon? Wow, I knew that on 9/11. It has taken you 7 years and you have no clue. Wrong 4

I love the loads of evidnece you have. tons
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom