RedIbis
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2007
- Messages
- 6,899
Red- Was Column 79 beneath the portion of the roof seen to collapse first?
Of course, why else would NIST pick it?
Red- Was Column 79 beneath the portion of the roof seen to collapse first?
Like I said, you waste a lot of energy dodging questions.
If you could name even one that I didn't respond to, I would be surprised. Rather than waste even more energy and derail this thread with your own personal little vendetta- why don't you actually answer the questions for once?
*bump again for Red.
Post #257
Of course, why else would NIST pick it?
Of course, why else would NIST pick it?
This is a really long thread. Please excuse my laziness, but can somebody put into one post all the evidence that has been provided that proves that 9/11 was an inside job?
Sorry for the extra work...but a simple list would be appreciated.
Since you don't believe NIST's hypothesis, what is your hypothesis?
Post #257
by Post #257
I've even seen you whine about not getting your questions answered when you didn't even ask a question.
This is a really long thread. Please excuse my laziness, but can somebody put into one post all the evidence that has been provided that proves that 9/11 was an inside job?
Sorry for the extra work...but a simple list would be appreciated.
This thread is going well. STILL not one single person has answered my original question. I think that speaks for itself.
Maybe you should ask it on a Truther forum?
Maybe you should ask it on a Truther forum?
I would but they don't use facts and common sense. They would say things like
- It looked like a demolition
- "Pull" is an industry standard term
- I have witnesses that heard explosions
- The fire wasnt hot enough to melt steel
I would be wasting my time.
arent those exactly the answers you expected here? and you are disapointed that the local truthers here did not give you what you wanted?
I guess I hoped this thread would make them realize they have nothing to go on.
