Why don't you just start a new thread on the subject and perhaps I'll participate. In the mean time, you should stay on topic. I understand its difficult for you to prove or make sense of almost anything you've said up to this point, but why not give it a shot? Its how we learn.Evasion noted again. I assume you cannot support your characterisation "Banks can essentially create as much money as they want"?
Thats cool, Ben. Its probably not over yet though as there is most likely lobbying going on behind closed doors as we post.Whoa. It failed.
You brought it up. I recognise your retreat though so case closed I guessWhy don't you just start a new thread on the subject and perhaps I'll participate.
Thats cool, Ben. Its probably not over yet though as there is most likely lobbying going on behind closed doors as we post.Hopefully they'll stand strong.
Perhaps you'd like to reread the post and ask a legitimate question? Asking me why I posted it isn't legitimate. I obviously posted it because it makes sense.You brought it up. I recognise your retreat though so case closed I guess![]()
Well, if thats the consequence of living above our means, then so be it. Perhaps we'll learn our lesson this time.And sink the economy. But maybe that is what you want.
Well, if thats the consequence of living above our means, then so be it. Perhaps we'll learn our lesson this time.
If the credit market stop working, it's not only those "living above their means" who will be affected, but pretty much everyone. Letting this happen just so we "learn a lesson" is right between the armchair-quaterback naive and the downward scary. Are you for letting people die from lung cancer just to "teach them a lesson"?
Why do you think is this (or, does it seem to be) less of a problem in Europe?
If the determining factor is the existence of Central Banks you would expect a similar problem to exist on this side of the Atlantic.
Also the policy of the Clinton administration vis-a-vis fiscally responsible budgetting would point towards a conclusion that the mere fact that a Central Bank exists as a lender of last resort is not sufficient to explain the current situation (it might be a necessary condition, though).
Hey, the Fed is most responsible for this mess. Everyone who knows anything about economics realizes that.If the credit market stop working, it's not only those "living above their means" who will be affected, but pretty much everyone. Letting this happen just so we "learn a lesson" is right between the armchair-quaterback naive and the downward scary. Are you for letting people die from lung cancer just to "teach them a lesson"?
So, did you think there would be no consequences to the way our financial leaders have misled and lied to us. Of course there will be consequences.What if no bailout happens?
How about, with twenty minutes to go, the biggest single day drop in Dow Jones Industrial Average history.
Actually, everyone who knows anything about economics realizes that 1) you can't blame a single entity for this mess, it's much more complex than that and 2) you, personally, aren't knowledgeable enough to express any sensible opinion on the matter.Hey, the Fed is most responsible for this mess. Everyone who knows anything about economics realizes that.
Hey, the Fed is most responsible for this mess. Everyone who knows anything about economics realizes that.
And your cancer analogy is simply too small minded to respond to, but I do forgive you for it.![]()
What if no bailout happens?
How about, with twenty minutes to go, the biggest single day drop in Dow Jones Industrial Average history.
The ad hominem insults are hurtful, small minded, but hurtful.....Again, I'll forgive you as its reasonably clear you're simply young and immature.Actually, everyone who knows anything about economics realizes that 1) you can't blame a single entity for this mess, it's much more complex than that and 2) you, personally, aren't knowledgeable enough to express any sensible opinion on the matter.