Why? You've chosen to make your eating decisions based on your ethics. But that doesn't mean anyone else in the world has to approach eating the same way. No one is so dense they don't realize the hamburgers they eat come from the same lumbering farm animals we've all passed in cars. Hell, Chik-Fil-A makes the point that cows want us to eat more chicken, with the obvious point being it means less of them would get slaughtered.
Okay, fair enough.
We get it, and to be quite honest most people have no desire to be shocked out of doing something that makes them happy, keeps them sustained, doesn't break any law, and is a billion times tastier than the alternative because of a small minority view that somehow livestock should be treated with the same reverence as humans.
Somehow, this reminds me of a short story I read, about a utopia that was somehow "powered" by the constant abuse of a child, and how most people were able to say, "Why should I care? I'm happy, I'm content, and I'm much happier than if we were to stop abusing the child".
Of course, children aren't animals, but the idea of morality trumping hedonism isn't a new one, nor particularly controversial.
Also, talking about how "something is legal" doesn't necessarily broadcast that it's necessarily moral. Legal decisions are often based off of moral beliefs, but that does not mean that legality = morality.
Also, seriously? "A billion times tastier"? You mean you've
never had a tasty vegetarian dish? All vegetables, fruits, nuts, and anything without even the smallest hint of meat is a billion times less tasty than anything with meat?
Wow. I have such deep, overwhelming pity for you. I hope I never am like you, ever. And hell, I still eat meat.
Sure. But while we're at it, let's look at why you think we disagree.
because of a small minority view that somehow livestock should be treated with the same reverence as humans.
Somehow, the myth has been spread that the only reason to want to treat animals a certain way is because we "view them as humans".
I'm sure you think of your cats as the same as humans, right? If not, why can't I abuse them or kill them for personal pleasure, outside of your personal ownership?
I've been mocked for viewing myself as "enlightened". Well, if not being enlightened means that the only reason I could ever campaign for a certain thing is because I view it as like a human, I think I'll keep the enlightenment. Unless you
honestly think that all the vegans or all of the people campaigning for what you're railing against
honestly regard animals as humans. In which case, you haven't been paying attention. But go figure, eh? Most of your posts come off that way, anyways.
Sometimes I wonder if these vegans that regard animals as humans aren't just a giant strawman, because I certainly haven't met many of them myself outside of some articles.
But for most of us, the notion of "rethinking their choice of food" if they're not willing to watch an animal get butchered is the equivilant of saying "if you can't watch a doctor perform open heart surgery, you should rethink having that operation."
Uhhh... there's about a million things wrong with that analogy.