• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

AA77 FDR Data, Explained

LashL said:
So, I'll remove the cause...

(insert evil chuckle here)

...but not the symptom.

:)
Click to expand...

There must be a way to have Franknfurter's remark apply to the PfT FDR data 'analysis' , hmmmmm.

( on another note; I cannot say "maybe the rain" without having it come out "may-beeee the rain" , a consequence of seeing the movie 9 times )
 
Last edited:
I spent the last hour or so skimming through this thread since the last time I've read it and I'm literally stunned at the level of non-progress our local truthers have made despite having things explained to them so many times and in so many ways. He's still repeating things I've proven physically impossible 20 pages ago.

The very first few posts I made to turbofan still contain virtually all elements of what is wrong with their analysis.

My usual offer about explaining how FDRs work, in detail, still stands to anyone who has actual intellectually honest questions, problems, or concerns with what happened on 9/11 or what I've said about it. It's just that you'll need to PM me to get my attention.
 
Last edited:
Isn't today the day that the biggest crime in the history of man is uncovered? I haven't seen anything on CNN or Fox news or any of the other big media news outlets about PFT. I guess they are still under control of the NWO.
 
Anti-sophist said:
I spent the last hour or so skimming through this thread since the last time I've read it and I'm literally stunned at the level of non-progress our local truthers have made despite having things explained to them so many times and in so many ways. He's still repeating things I've proven physically impossible 20 pages ago.

The very first few posts I made to turbofan still contain virtually all elements of what is wrong with their analysis.

My usual offer about explaining how FDRs work, in detail, still stands to anyone who has actual intellectually honest questions, problems, or concerns with what happened on 9/11 or what I've said about it. It's just that you'll need to PM me to get my attention.
Click to expand...

It's about time you came back. Guess what? I have access to an ARINC
document that you should probably skim through before opening your mouth
as an "expert" on "FDR Data Explained".

Did you catch that weird new animation that came from the FAA (so they say)?

Better yet, did you see PFT's latest animation that correct's Mackey's 4.0 G
error and imiginary account of the dive based on his dreams?

It's a great little video which puts all of your calculations to shame. You
should grab a video soon. They'll even send you a free apron with your order
if you're quick enough.

:D

P.S. T4-T5 :rolleyes: Let's talk lag now, I'll really put you to shame in
front of your friends here. Was that 500 msec lag per frame, or just something
you tossed in at the last second to make your story make sense?
 
BTW, I just sent Anti a PM about starting a new thread to debate FDR's.

Let's see if he accepts. I have some new info to share with everyone :cool:
 
It could only be boring for a government loyalist. I mean, Anit is claiming to
be the expert and "explain" the system without having documents and asking
PFT to supply diagrams!

Not only does he have incorrect information in his theory, he;s ASKING QUESTIONS
as opposed to explaining the FDR :rolleyes:

I'd like to see a new thread started between Anti and myself using proper
information and references. You'll see very quickly that his summary is based
purely on assumptions.

P.S. If any of you 'researchers' care, you can buy ARINC documentation
on the web site.

Here;s a link to the site:

https://www.arinc.com/cf/store/catalog.cfm?prod_group_id=43&category_group_id=76

Maybe if you sell enough DVD's and aprons you can afford your own! LMAO!
 
Turbofan said:
I have some new info to share with everyone :cool:
Click to expand...

Rob Balsamo's surgery was a success?


629737878_c3f4154858.jpg
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
Yep, it's still all about pwning people on the internet.

Has the PffffT contacted any real FDR experts yet to corroborate the findings of their pretend ones?
Click to expand...

Has anyone here picked up a copy of ARINC's documentation before
claiming to be an 'expert'?

I guess you didn't see the latest FAA animation which also contradicts your
belief. Are they not professionals and the FAA?

We have contacted experts and have experts working behind the scenes
at PFT. Remember, our members actaully met with ARINC reps and had
people help decode the raw file.

What have YOU , or anyone else here done? What's that? Nothing?
 
Turbofan said:
Remember, our members actaully met with ARINC reps and had
people help decode the raw file.
Click to expand...
So ARINC agrees with the findings of the PffffT? Has ARINC called for a new investigation? Or does this just mean that a salesman who had no idea what you were doing agreed with one small part of a much bigger picture?

You aren't fooling anybody Turbofan. PffffT is a joke even among the conspiracy nutters.
 
Turbofan said:
What have YOU , or anyone else here done? What's that? Nothing?
Click to expand...

Exactly what would you expect anyone here to do? We're not the ones with the extraordinary claims. We aren't the ones claiming 'inside job'. You are the one who needs to be doing something.

You can claim you have experts 'working behind the scenes' all you want, but the lack of progress convincing the world you have rock-solid evidence of evil doing suggests it may not be as rock solid as you let on to be.
 
Myriad said:
Arithmetic.

Correctly.

Respectfully,
Myriad
Click to expand...

No. Your arithmetic is incorrect. It's covered, disected and put to rest in the
presentation complete with a reference diagram.

PFT also has detailed and updated figures using scale analysis which further
supports their research.
 
Turbofan said:
No. Your arithmetic is incorrect. It's covered, disected and put to rest in the
presentation complete with a reference diagram.

PFT also has detailed and updated figures using scale analysis which further
supports their research.
Click to expand...

So when should we expect the ICAO to come on board and demand a new investigation?
 
Turbofan said:
BTW, I just sent Anti a PM about starting a new thread to debate FDR's.

Let's see if he accepts. I have some new info to share with everyone :cool:
Click to expand...

You are a terrorist apologist making up lies about Flight 77. You have no evidence and you can't understand simple math as evident by 11.2 G error made by your p4t group of terrorist apologist. Look like your imaginary government loyalist opposition is not to be found, but there is knowledge on physics used to destroy your delusional quest to apologize for terrorist when you say the aircraft found in the Pentagon was not Flight 77.

DME errors, and storage resolution make your p4t delusional quest false again as you and p4t sell implications of lies, ones which you actually make.

You have failed to address the fact FDR stops over 6 seconds prior to impact at the Pentagon. You have taken the bait on the animation of an aircraft impacting the Pentagon, possible from the FAA made days after 9/11. Good luck using hearsay and false information to make you feel good about apologizing for terrorist and blaming other people for the act of 19 terrorist. Very nice to have someone who has zero knowledge on flying try to make up lies and twist reality to make fantasy due to lack of knowledge on math, physics, and flying.



How will you debate AS when you can't get 256 w/s correct and have no clue why 11.2 G is bogus physics? You can't model DME accuracy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom