• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

AA77 FDR Data, Explained

Turbofan said:
Yup, just as suspected. More circular nonsense.

Most of you are nothing but paranoid cowards.
Click to expand...



kettle.jpg
 
Quite funny that our team has produced raw file data with the help of
others, and obtained high level documentation which none of your 'pros'
currently possess.

It's almost as funny as Anti starting a thread called "AA77 FDR Data, Explained"
while asking PFT for diagrams and information needed to complete his thought! LMAO!

:D

It amazes me how Anti, Beachnut, Mackey, ReHeat are considered 'experts'
without knowing the system particulars.

:big:
 
It amazes me how Anti, Beachnut, Mackey, ReHeat are considered 'experts'
without knowing the system particulars.
Click to expand...

It amazes me that you're not in a straitjacket.

Bananaman.
 
Turbofan said:
Quite funny that our team has produced raw file data with the help of
others, and obtained high level documentation which none of your 'pros'
currently possess.

It's almost as funny as Anti starting a thread called "AA77 FDR Data, Explained"
while asking PFT for diagrams and information needed to complete his thought! LMAO!

:D

It amazes me how Anti, Beachnut, Mackey, ReHeat are considered 'experts'
without knowing the system particulars.

:big:
Click to expand...
It's even more amazing that you would make this claim with zero real knowledge of the system particulars. For instance, you still believe that 500ms is the max time from sensor to CPM. Of course, this is false and you have refused to correct your error since it was pointed out to you.
 
Turbofan said:
Quite funny that our team has produced raw file data with the help of
others, and obtained high level documentation which none of your 'pros'
currently possess.

It's almost as funny as Anti starting a thread called "AA77 FDR Data, Explained"
while asking PFT for diagrams and information needed to complete his thought! LMAO!



It amazes me how Anti, Beachnut, Mackey, ReHeat are considered 'experts'
without knowing the system particulars.
Click to expand...
Wow, they did not get the DME right! The times are wrong and 87 percent of the vertical accelerations are missing. LOL, experts, not, just amateurs making other spew lies they imply.

You are funny. You use Balsamo insults and mimic his lack of knowledge on flying.

All your ideas on 9/11 are like your 64 w/s statement. Now you have to learn to correct your lies and errors..
 
Last edited:
Turbofan said:
Yup, just as suspected. More circular nonsense.
Click to expand...

,and still no technical paper from PfT. Nothing for an organization with expertise in FDR analysis to work with other than the bald claims, and cheesey videos (replete with accusations paranoid of gov't conspiracy) to actually work on.

FDR Experts at PFT consist of Aircaft Accident Investigators, including one
who taught the subject at the premier aviation University in the country.
Click to expand...

For which we have nothing at all but the word of PfT to go on

We also have FDR Experts currently working for FDR Companies. We will give
you their names the moment you are able to decode the raw file yourselves
and give us the names of those who did.
Click to expand...

Once again I ask, why is it so important for PfT to confront anonymous internet posters before going public rather than bring the information that the FDR data does not match the accepted flight path to organizations with a definite interest in such a senario, and expertise in FDR analysis?

You were told all this before numerous times.
Click to expand...

, and you have been asked numerous times why it is so ultimately important to have this debate in the backwater of internet forums.

Why wont Beachnut call L3?
Click to expand...

Why won't PfT, who is making the extrodinary claim that the data stored on L3's equipment, and the accepted flight path don't match, write a technical paper on this and submit it to L3 for analysis and comment?
Cheesey videos don't cut it in that regard and you must know it by now.

You used to complain truthers didn't have any Structural Engineers. Many
went public and you started character assassination. Most of you are
nothing but paranoid cowards.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the TM got 1 or 2 and they are in the extreme minority as far as SE go.

As far as PfT goes you claim that the 'real' FDR experts for PfT must remain anonymous and tout the membership of the forum including one who believes that ET's are among us and thatthere are bases on the Moon. He, and all the rest cannot be shown to have expertise in FDR analysis.
 
Last edited:
Turbofan said:
Quite funny that our team has produced raw file data with the help of
others, and obtained high level documentation which none of your 'pros'
currently possess.

It's almost as funny as Anti starting a thread called "AA77 FDR Data, Explained"
while asking PFT for diagrams and information needed to complete his thought! LMAO!

:D

It amazes me how Anti, Beachnut, Mackey, ReHeat are considered 'experts'
without knowing the system particulars.

:big:
Click to expand...

Ah, there you go referring to experts again. What again is the expertise regarding FDRs that the members of PFT have? Please remind us since every post of yours brings up the issue of expertise and denounces other in their expertise.

Is the answer still none? Because I find it funny that a group of people with absolutely no expertise at all go around touting how people who are not experts, but still have more experience in related fields are so uncredible. And at the same time that same group refuses to consult with real experts or publish a technical paper. Instead they intend to try and sell products off of it.

PFT is worse than email scammers.
 
I predict that the 11.2G page will not be 'corrected'. Instead there will be a small part of "Pandora's Box Revolutions" that contains a handwaving arguement dealing with the g accellerations that plane must have experienced. Little or no math and physics will be presented and most certainly it will not be in text form on paper or an internet web page.

you heard it here first ,,,,,,,, oooh can I claim the million if I am right?
 
1,000,000 buck check is in the mail




poor Turbofan, fooled by the pilots who make up stupid ideas and mess up 9/11 issues.
 
Last edited:
jaydeehess said:
Yet another video.

...

pathos, they name is PfT
Click to expand...

It's a lot easier to crank out another phony video than actually publish a paper where peer review might be involved.

Funny how that always seems to be a stumbling block for them.

Ya reckon it's the Illuminati who control peer review? Freemasons? Zionist bankers?
 
uk_dave said:
To be fair, the powers that be have engineered a totally bogus 'democratic election for office of president' in order to distract from the ground breaking work of various 'truther' groups. We know it's bogus because 9-11 'truth' doesn't get mentioned and that just can't be possible when 86% of the electorate believe the incumbent party was behind 9-11..... allegedly.
Click to expand...

That's one hell of a coverup plan ... hold a Presidential election as a distraction from the Great Truths spewing forth from Twoofer Central.

Damn, it seemed to work, too, since the Twoofer Movement doesn't even seem to register on anyone's radar screen anymore, except as a figure of fun.

If 86% of the electorate is made up of Twoofers, it's odd that Alex Jones didn't run as a third-party candidate this time around. Seems like an easy win, and it would fit right in with his megalomania.
 
MSgtWeiss said:
Ya reckon it's the Illuminati who control peer review? Freemasons? Zionist bankers?
Click to expand...
It's even worse than that - real actual experts in the field, rather than the goofs, dolts, frauds, mentally ill, and snake oil salesmen who make up the the pretend FDR experts at PfffT.
 
Hmmm, Alex Jones for President,,,,,,,,,,,

If that were to occur I would predict (there I go again) extra-judicial executions of the traitors from the present regime and that the office of POTUS would soon become one with Supreme Executive power (and a lifetime appointment)
 
Those of you who can view PfT forums, is there a 'party line' concerning a comprehensive, purely technical paper we here call for whenever a PfT denizen pops by?

If I were to go by what TF has posted the reasoning would be "what's the use no one will look at it" to which the response of course is
1) JREF certainly would look at it and we seem to be their main focus
2) The videos are not getting watched by any organization with expertise in FDR analysis either. Time to change the game plan.
 
Last edited:
Two days until the proposed release of the video to answer all questions, to address all critisims of PfT claims.

Is anyone else as filled with anticipation as I am?

(Its a trick question!)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom