It does not matter what the FBI told him. The FDR data trumps all. So do the eye witness records. When did the FBI inform him of the trajectory?
fdr data is fraudulent.
the eyewitnesses contradict it.
when people say "over the scrapyard" they're talking that general vicinity since there is nothing else near the crash site. the plane did not come inverted over the scrapyard in a southeast heading impacting nose first into the ground as the official story and phony fdr claim.
didn't happen that way.
for starters had it i don't think bob blair and doug miller would have ever seen the plane let alone seeing it flying on its side with the wings vertical to the ground and see more of the front of the plane than the back as they both told me.
and we're not even going to get in the other plane they both saw yet either. i'm saving that. you can call them if you're anxious.
At some point they may have been at a 90 deg angle but not when it hit the ground
right wing tip first into the ground shattering the front 1/3 of the plane and blowing it into the trees.
how does your inverted over the scrapyard nose first impact account for the blast trajectory and debris?
Does he say the plane was on fire and had pieces falling off it because it had been shot down by a fighter jet? It would be very noticeable.
nope. if i remember correctly your token board hero ryan mackey determined lee purbaugh could not have seen the plane {provided the fdr data is accurate and authentic}. i imagine in the1-3 seconds you see something it is possible not to notice such.
jim stop was in indian lake and saw the plane fly overhead towards the crash site losing debris. since the plane was at a higher altitude and the debris actually ended up landing in the lake where he was i guess he would be a better witness for that aspect.
lee purbaugh is a witness you would use to determine direction plane came from, impact angle, & the impact itself. especially since the plane had to be less than 100' agl at that point and he didn't see it approaching.
I can tell you all about the missiles that you think may have been used to shoot it down.
you have no idea about any method/technique/weapon
i believe were used in the shoot down and it's not up to me to speculate publicly on such. so i see your bait and i'll keep on swimming. save that stuff for the newbs.
Very small pieces drifting on the wind
yeah the problem is there are very small pieces everywhere in the direction of the blast trajectory. so you have no theory or reason for why piece a is picked up and carried away 8 miles to new baltimore and piece b isn't despite them both being the same size and density and both hitting the ground heading in the same direction and same speed at the same time.
plus no one saw any debris blown in a southeast direction across the field heading towards indian lake and new baltimore.
and if the plane wasn't compromised in the air then your theory means you believe a massive jet fuel fireball [the type that weakened steel in the wtc according to you] safely lifted paper envelopes into the air and allowed them to descend to the earth some eight miles away despite incinerating the majority of the airplane and its passengers and crew.
maybe we should construct 757's out of envelopes and red bandanas in the future?
How often do you hear something yet not really know where the sound is coming from? nothing to do with Wally Miller
using other eyewitnesses to corroborate wally millers account has everything to do with wally miller.
and when 6 or 7 people all corroborate each other then they don't need degrees in psychoacoustical analysis to determine if a low flying commercial airliner passed them from the northeast to the southwest.
see the sound can never pass over indian lake marina or golf course if the official story is true.
the lights flicker in the marina.
john fleegle jokes to jim brandt, carol delasko, and tom spinelli "maybe they're coming for us"......
a low flying plane is overheard coming from the northeast heading southwest.
then there is a thud that shakes the earth and an explosion.
uh oh official story. 
I never said i would not watch it but if the rest is as supportive of the official story as the first 7 minutes then I may watch the rest.
you don't want to. its alright. actually its most likely genetics that prevents you from being interested in actual research and knowledge which explains your gravitating to this location.
Are you putting words and accusations into Wallys mouth? Someone may contact him and ask him what hethinks of your projections and how you have used his claims.
oh please call wally miller and tell him how i am supporting his explanation of the crash which is supported by the physical evidence to prove the fdr data and the official flight path told by the us gov is a fabrication.
do you need his number? (814) 445-6900
http://www.superpages.com/bp/Somers...&C=miller+funeral+home&L=Shanksville+PA&lbp=1
make sure you record it so we can all verify your honesty too, ok?
also tell him i said he doesn't mock the shoot down theory because he doesn't really know what brought the plane down which makes him open to it and that he ridicules the no plane/bodies theory which i too do not support.
i'll be waiting for you to do nothing. continue to prove me right duh-bunkers. 
