SezMe
post-pre-born
Brings new meaning to Soylent Green.
Nope. It's a mass flow rate of gases problem. Wind currents take care of that.You don't think a couple of hundred thousand bodies rotting in the noon day sun might not qualify as pollution?
Madrid is nice but with another European city hosting in 2012 it probably should be elsewhere and I'm sure that Rio and Tokyo would both be great but.......I would like Chicago to get it. Having the completed 610 meter tall Chicago Spire as a backdrop would just be so dramatic.
I'm not a big fan of the Olympics or of large cities, but I voted Tokyo because that's the city where those games would make the most sense in a free market. It has more people willing to pay high ticket prices, better infrastructure, if the games are meant to represent "world peace" then Japan has been setting a very good example lately, and you just know they'll be trying to one-up China so the games would be extra good.![]()
i voted for Chicago, only because it is closest to me in Southeast Michigan.
but canada is the obvious choice, they have a lot of extra room right?![]()
Canada is hosting the 2010 winter Olympics, though, so both Toronto and Montreal dropped their 2016 bids when the IOC decision on 2010 was made.
I voted for Rio, perhaps somewhat hastily because of personal experience and fabulous memoriesbut thinking about it further, Chicago might be able to pull it off, as might Madrid. Tokyo - no, I don't see that happening.
Unfortunately, the folks at McMurdo are too busy to put together anything more than a half-assed proposal to the IOC.Antarctica.
Besides, it's the best hope we have here of the city actually fixing the trains so it doesn't take over an hour to get to O'hare from downtown!