• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CIT Ranke and Marquis make cover of OC Weekly

Good Lord have mercy!

Is he really that delusional to refer to himself as "Capt"? The jerk doesn't even have an ATP and his Commercial Certificate is currently not valid due to an expired medical.

 
Captain Bob said:
Do you happen to have a contact number so experts can inform you regarding 9/11? Or do you prefer to beat up on your local residents.
Click to expand...


Dear Captain Bob,

As a cat owner who makes regular donations to our local animal shelter, I can honestly say I'd rather stomp kittens with my bare feet than listen to your idiotic "experts" "inform me regarding 9/11" with their fraudulent nonsense for even 30 seconds.

But really, thanks for asking. :)

Sincerely,
Drudgewire
 
bje said:
Little Captain Bob is really upset.
Click to expand...

Did Cap'n Bob really start his post out with "OK Troops" Wow, what color is the sky in those nuts' world?

PS: Cap'n? Yeah, maybe ferreting out and publishing the private contact number of members of the press who write about you is not a great idea, ya dopey stalker creep?

Why not post your flight path calculations instead? That will show him!

These guys are pathetic.
 
bje said:
Little Captain Bob is really upset.
Click to expand...

Isn't he though....

Captain Bob said:
ok troops, please try to fish out Nicks number. I'll be working it on my end as well. Dont hesitate to post his contact number here if you find it. If you find his cell, please send it to me via PM. Do not post it here. As much as the man is a slimeball, he still has a right to privacy... to an extent
Click to expand...

Oh dear! Captain Bob needs to find the number of Super Nanny JoJo so she can give him a time out in the naughty chair.
 
If all of their "troops" start dialing numbers in sequence now and try a few hundred a day each, they should be able to find a New Jersey pizza place by the end of the year, and Nick Schou's cell number around the year 7480, give or take a few millennia.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Oh my!
This just keeps getting better and better.
I doubt Nick will be too fearful of Psycho Bob after he publicly flogged our DA.
What is that expression about being as crazy as a rat in an outhouse?
My favorite has to be Psycho Bob's PS
PS: Be expecting a recorded call in the near future. However, I expect you will dodge and evade. Be advised pilots can counter evasive maneuvers. Good luck.
Click to expand...
 
From Psycho Bob's post above the linked one:
I agree with painter, however i also agree any publicity is good publicity. Case in point, our hits coming from http://thepentacon.com increased since the article hit, which means the article increased your hits, which means people dont take "Schou" at his word and are looking into the information presented.

When hit pieces like this get published, be ready for a wave of new visitors and be sure to have a counter argument ready for them to see. Because they will come... and that is why i say, "Good job"...
Click to expand...
This just continues to be ego love fest for these psychos.
No mention of going to court it seems the most important thing to be gained is increased traffic to their websites.
 
Captain Bob said:
Do you happen to have a contact number so experts can inform you regarding 9/11? Or do you prefer to beat up on your local residents.
Click to expand...

So rather than actually sending Schou an e-mail outlining their 'evidence' he would rather call the man up and tell it to him. (???)

Once again it illustrates that Cpt Bobby is not truly serious about getting his 'evidence' out to the general public. If he was this is his golden opportunity to supply a detailed outline of the reasoning behind PfT's contention that the flight path described by the DFDR in Flt 77 does not match the flight path illustrated by the physical damage on the ground.

While it does not actually bolster the CiT claims it is after all the raison d'etre of PfT.

The CiT failed to positively impress the reporter. Now PfT wants a chance and is working on ways to ,,,, also fail at it.

My favorite part of the exchange is
I could actually care less if you inteview us. Its clear you wont take on those with a professional background.
Click to expand...

So Cpt Bob actually does care some, if he could care less. A point he drives home with his vitriol of the next sentence.:rolleyes:
 
jaydeehess said:
While it does not actually bolster the CiT claims it is after all the raison d'etre of PfT.

The CiT failed to positively impress the reporter. Now PfT wants a chance and is working on ways to ,,,, also fail at it.
Click to expand...


It's hilarious how closely their reaction shadows those of the bigfoot researchers a couple of days after the Georgia body blew up in their faces, and they started lashing out at those who dared to call bull:rule10 on it from the beginning.
 
I enjoyed how Craig hilighted his ignorance by completely misunderstanding the annotation term [sic]. Good Job, Mr. Ranke.
 
Minadin said:
I enjoyed how Craig hilighted his ignorance by completely misunderstanding the annotation term [sic]. Good Job, Mr. Ranke.
Click to expand...

Near as I can see, Mr.Schou spelled "team" correctly.
However I see that wiki states:
Sic is a Latin word meaning "thus", "so", "as such", or "just as that". In writing, it is placed within square brackets and usually italicized— [sic] —to indicate that an incorrect or unusual spelling, phrase, punctuation, and/or other preceding quoted material has been reproduced
Click to expand...

Which would apply to the entire phrase as Craig and Aldo call themselves the 'Citizen Investigation Team'. Wouldn't it?
 
jhunter1163 said:
If they were really interested in the "truth", they wouldn't waste any time at all on Schou but would instead be trying to get their smoking-weed gun evidence to the authorities.

CIT is, painfully obviously, a fraud, and PffffT is just as bad.
Click to expand...

Exactly. These guys would have us believe that they were somehow duped by Schou and OC Weekly. Of course they weren't. CIT saw an opportunity to publicize themselves and increase whatever modicum of "fame and fortune" they have attained thus far, and it blew up right in their hubristic, delusional faces.
 
jaydeehess said:
Near as I can see, Mr.Schou spelled "team" correctly.
However I see that wiki states:


Which would apply to the entire phrase as Craig and Aldo call themselves the 'Citizen Investigation Team'. Wouldn't it?
Click to expand...

'Sic' just means that whatever oddness preceeding it was due to the original material and not some typographical error on the part of the person citing the quote. It's usually odd or wrong spellings but it doesn't have to be.

In the article it was used correctly when he quoted that they weren't "accusing anyone specific [sic]" because the use of the word specific is strange there, since it is an adjective, but it is modifying the act of accusing, which it a verb, and therefore it wants to be the adverb, specifically.



I can't seem to find Mr. Schou's error anywhere in the original article to comment on it. It may be that he's edited it to reflect the correct name of their "tax paying LLC" (read: not Not-For-Profit).
 
Minadin said:
In the article it was used correctly when he quoted that they weren't "accusing anyone specific [sic]" because the use of the word specific is strange there, since it is an adjective, but it is modifying the act of accusing, which it a verb, and therefore it wants to be the adverb, specifically.
Click to expand...

That's what i said:

Craig writes: "Schou incorrectly claims we spelled the word “specific” wrong in one of our presentations when he quotes us and adds the Latin literary reference “[sic]” after the correctly spelled word." The word wasn't spelled wrong, ya goof, it was the wrong word. Not that I am blaming anyone "specifically." Still waiting for the flight path, by the way.
 
Why is it wrong to use the phrase "anyone specific"? The first meaning of "specific" in my dictionary is "explicitly set forth; definite", so it seems quite reasonable to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom