• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Arson in WTC 6?

Galileo said:
That's all ya got?

Such a smug retort of your guilty demeanor would get you convicted by any reasonable jury. You have no explanation as to why WTC 6 was on fire from WTC 1. I do. I have a witness who can testify regarding the explosions there.

Game, set, match!
Click to expand...

Post a picture taken at least a minute afterward showing the damage done by that explosion or you have a big stink handful of compost.
 
Galileo said:
I've got an eyewitness who saw explosions. Another eyewitness saw WTC 6 on fire at around 11:15. You have guilty demeanor. This is an easy conviction.
Click to expand...

This is utter crap. There is a possibility that there were explosions that nobody bothered to report. I am sure that some of what the planes threw out the other sides of the towers was heay enough to go through a roof and maybe start a fire. Not very significant in comparison to the towers.
 
Galileo said:
Are you calling John Peruggia a liar? He was a brave first responder.
Click to expand...

Where can I find an unedited quote from Perrugia? His statements are not supported by other oral histories.

And that the blob in mid-air is an explosion is unsupported by any evidence. I am still waiting for you to show me a picture of the hole it blew in the building. Get busy wityh that or stop wasting the time of the grown-ups.
 
leftysergeant said:
This is utter crap. There is a possibility that there were explosions that nobody bothered to report. I am sure that some of what the planes threw out the other sides of the towers was heay enough to go through a roof and maybe start a fire. Not very significant in comparison to the towers.
Click to expand...

someone did report the explosions, a medic did, that's the whole point of this post. Please read before you post, so you don't make a fool of yourself here. And a fire chief reported the building on fire for no reason. None of the plane debris hit WTC 6, go look at the charts. And WTC 6 was NOT on fire after the planes hit, only after WTC1 fell down from a controlled demolition.
 
leftysergeant said:
Where can I find an unedited quote from Perrugia? His statements are not supported by other oral histories.

And that the blob in mid-air is an explosion is unsupported by any evidence. I am still waiting for you to show me a picture of the hole it blew in the building. Get busy wityh that or stop wasting the time of the grown-ups.
Click to expand...

I didn't post the blob. I amnot a bloberer. The blob is not relevant because bioth towers were standing in the photo. Peruggia saw the giant fire in WTC 6 after WTC 1 fell, but before WTC 2 fell.
 
Galileo said:
smug retorts like that by people with guilty demeanor are easy convictions for prosecutors. An innocent person would face the evidence and explain it, rather than act like they were guilty.
Click to expand...


Really. How easy is it for prosecutors to get a conviction when no charges have been specified and no defendant has been identified?

In the case of wtc6, do you expect charges to be filed against a pile of rubble that has a guilty demeanor, or did you have an actual suspect in mind?

In the case of Myriad vs. Aggressive Stupidity, what charges do you think my guilty demeanor would make it easy for a prosecutor to convict me of?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Galileo said:
I didn't post the blob. I amnot a bloberer. The blob is not relevant because bioth towers were standing in the photo. Peruggia saw the giant fire in WTC 6 after WTC 1 fell, but before WTC 2 fell.
Click to expand...

My bad. I thought you were trying to prove that it was on fire before the south tower fell.

So you still have nothing there. With all that debris breaking out windows and spreading burning debris around, there are all sorts of precise causes that could have started the fire.

Trouble is that they all support an accidental origin, directly related to the fall of the south tower.
 
Galileo said:
someone did report the explosions, a medic did, that's the whole point of this post.
Click to expand...

If, by a "medic," you are referring to Ondrovic, you are on shaky ground. PTSD and all that. Her testimony conflicts with others on crucial; points. Greater credibility must be given to the testimony of people who were not then operating in total panic mode and who do not now suffer debilitating PTSD.
 
leftysergeant said:
My bad. I thought you were trying to prove that it was on fire before the south tower fell.

So you still have nothing there. With all that debris breaking out windows and spreading burning debris around, there are all sorts of precise causes that could have started the fire.

Trouble is that they all support an accidental origin, directly related to the fall of the south tower.
Click to expand...

Then why didn't WTC 1 catch on fire? It was much closer. WTC 6 was mostly screened from debris by the North tower.
 
leftysergeant said:
If, by a "medic," you are referring to Ondrovic, you are on shaky ground. PTSD and all that. Her testimony conflicts with others on crucial; points. Greater credibility must be given to the testimony of people who were not then operating in total panic mode and who do not now suffer debilitating PTSD.
Click to expand...

Her testimony regarding WTC 6 does not conflict with anyone. And why did the oral histories redact part of her testimony, the part where she described the explosives in WTC 6.
 
Galileo said:
Her testimony regarding WTC 6 does not conflict with anyone. And why did the oral histories redact part of her testimony, the part where she described the explosives in WTC 6.
Click to expand...


There were no explosives anywhere in the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks. Absolutely no evidence exists for the use of explosives.

Your evil movement is dead.
 
Galileo said:
Her testimony regarding WTC 6 does not conflict with anyone. And why did the oral histories redact part of her testimony, the part where she described the explosives in WTC 6.
Click to expand...

How do you get the descriptions of explosions being redacted? I saw her descriptions of explosions and they conflict with all scientific possibility in the case of the explosions inside WTC 6 and with DeShore's oral history in re the bombs going off on the street.
 
pomeroo said:
There were no explosives anywhere in the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks. Absolutely no evidence exists for the use of explosives.

Your evil movement is dead.
Click to expand...

how do you know bin Laden didn't plant them?
 
Galileo --- could you please summarize your "guilty demeanor" argument in a single paragraph, so I can Stundie it? Thanks.
 
Galileo said:
I don't have standing to file, since I don't live in New York. Why don't you file it, since you like to volunteer work out to other people.
Click to expand...

Why would you have to live in NY? And why would I file a lawsuit for something i think is absolutely nuts an laughably absurd? I'm not the idiot here, so it's silly to think I would go do it. I am also not going to join a religious cult that drinks poisoned coolaid. Why? Because it's idiotic. I am also not going to file a lawsuit claiming that the US never landed on the oon. Because it's idiotic.

And if you don't feel exposing the biggest crime in the history of man kind i worth going to a NY court, then why don't you have one o the other 9/11 cult members do it? Isn't this what you kids are about? Or is this just a joke to you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom