• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

I can't see why they bother with the "Flight 93" conspiracy.

gumboot said:
For what it's worth I've seen a photograph of human remains recovered from Shanksville. It was bone fragments, in a bucket (white, from memory).
Click to expand...

There's a copy of it here on Gravy's site. I remember the original source being a pdf about the work of volunteers at the crash site published by one of the local agencies involved.

The remains in that photo were recovered in a final sweep made of the crash site after the major work of recovering debris and remains was finished, to find any small items that had been missed by the original searches. IIRC, they recovered three plastic buckets full of bone fragments as well as a number of small bits of the airplane.
 
RedIbis said:
I really hope you're not waiting around for me to answer hypothetical, leading questions. <snipped additional blather>
Click to expand...

It is plain and obvious that you have consistently failed and refused to respond to numerous legitimate questions in numerous threads, RedIbis, and that you consistently run away from them, disappear from the threads in which they are asked, only to resurface later in other threads with the same old tinhat conspiracy crap and the same old troll-like behaviour.

This is a skeptics forum. Around here, evidence is required in support of one's assertions, allegations and accusations. You consistently fail and refuse to provide any evidence whatsoever in support of your numerous unsupported assertions, allegations and accusations.

Instead, you have consistently run away every time your baseless accusations have been challenged by reality, or, alternatively, tried to derail a thread with semantics.

It matters not a whit what you or I or anyone else for that matter thinks or says insofar as the events of 9/11 are concerned unless and until one is willing to both state a position and support it with facts and evidence. Most of us here have stated our positions and supported it with evidence, but you keep refusing to do so. Do you seriously wonder why nobody takes you seriously in light of your poor behaviour and your refusal to back up your evidence-free assertions and your baseless allegations?

It really is way beyond time for you to put up or shut up.

So, let's have it. For purposes of this thread, spell out your take on the plight of UA93 on September 11, 2001. (And please don't play silly buggers yet again - just spell it out from your perspective.)
 
Last edited:
LashL said:
So, let's have it. For purposes of this thread, spell out your take on the plight of UA93 on September 11, 2001. (And please don't play silly buggers yet again - just spell it out from your perspective.)
Click to expand...

I don't think Flight 93 crashed in that ditch in Shanksville. There just isn't enough material to account for it crashing in that location.
 
RedIbis said:
I don't think Flight 93 crashed in that ditch in Shanksville. There just isn't enough material to account for it crashing in that location.
Click to expand...

What about the testimonies of first responders, forensic experts and pathologists?
 
RedIbis said:
I don't think Flight 93 crashed in that ditch in Shanksville. There just isn't enough material to account for it crashing in that location.
Click to expand...

Are you referring to the fact that only 90% of the plane was recovered?
 
How much longer is RedIbis going to keep running away from reality like this?

For once I'd like him to acknowledge at least one fact.
 
Alt+F4 said:
Are you referring to the fact that only 90% of the plane was recovered?
Click to expand...

Actually CNN reported that 95% of the plane was recovered. Ok, show pictures of this 95% of Flight 93. Next, tell me where it's being stored, or was it incinerated? That's a lot of tons of material to have seemingly disappeared, leaving behind what looks mostly like half a commercial container's worth of scrap from the nearby scrapyard.
 
RedIbis said:
Actually CNN reported that 95% of the plane was recovered. Ok, show pictures of this 95% of Flight 93. Next, tell me where it's being stored, or was it incinerated? That's a lot of tons of material to have seemingly disappeared, leaving behind what looks mostly like half a commercial container's worth of scrap from the nearby scrapyard.
Click to expand...

As I mentioned in a previous post, only 75% of ValueJet Flight 592 was recovered after it crashed. That plane (a DC-9) weighted 114,000 lbs. which means that 28,000 lbs. (14 tons) are unaccounted for. Does that mean it didn't crash there?
 
Oh, so now you decide to answer my posts all of a sudden? Why don't you answer my other post now?
 
Getting back to the Valujet crash for a minute, I've yet to see a photograph that even comes close to showing the 82,000 lbs. of wreckage that was said to be recovered.

Hmmm....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom