Ghost hunters proves there are no ghosts.

How is it that these 'ghost hunters' never look for 'ghosts' on old battle fields where hundreds and thousands died ?
 
Why is it that no 'ghost hunters' have yet to find the 'ghosts' of any old 'ghost hunters'?
 
six7s said:
Why is it that no 'ghost hunters' have yet to find the 'ghosts' of any old 'ghost hunters'?
Click to expand...

Just to mess with these new dumb ghost hunters' heads??? :D

Oh, I know, or maybe they are having too much fun travelling to England to throw stones at the "Most Haunted" crew!
 
Last edited:
Minarvia said:
Their "debunking" is usually, imo, pretty half-hearted. They want to look legit, but they have no idea of the scientific method they profess to use. They wave gadgets around in the dark, act spooked, get paid for it, and once in a while declare a place haunted.
Click to expand...

That was my impression too. I've only seen a few episodes, and usually only parts of episodes because I am really waiting for another show to start and it's a time killer.

As far as seeing people getting spooked you'd be better off watching SciFi's "Scare Tactics." It's amazing how absurd some of the scenarios they use on that show actually work to scare people. I think there is an element of Pascal's Wager going on there:

http://hubpages.com/hub/Pascals-Scare-Tactic
 
normdoering: I have not watched Scare Tactics but might tape a couple just to see. Thanks for the excellent (Pascal's Wager) link.
 
Short of a Scooby-Doo style unmasking, I'm not sure how you could say that you've debunked a haunting. Things that only happen some of the time are notoriously hard to pinpoint or get measurement from.

Is there any reason to assume that if ghosts exist (whether as a lost soul, some time echo thing, or surrounding environment recording something visual) that wells, Transylvania, monks or violent deaths would make that location more likely than another?

Would we know if there's a certain time rather than another when they might become active?

If none of the gadgets they use in these shows has ever officially and empirically recorded a haunting, how could anyone know that such devices would be capable of detecting ghosts?
 
Bones

The Ghost Hunters probably put the bones in the well before they began filming
 
They proved Ghosts are camera shy. I don't know why a ghost would want to be seen seriously. Let's say the ghost is a demon from hell. Does it make sense for the demon to prove that Satan exists by being seen on camera? I see not point in trying to scientifically prove or disprove the paranormal because doing so suggests that God needs publicity.

I have come to believe that God allows people to go back to places that were significant to them when they were alive to learn lessons or to see for a last time. That is what some Catholic theologian said so I will go by that.

My school is supposedly haunted, there are tons of ghost stories, and I’ve walked around in the loneliest places at night and never came across anything remotely paranormal. And my college building is very old.
 
skepticalbeliever said:
They proved Ghosts are camera shy. QUOTE]

Heh heh! I recall those old ridiculous photos spiritist camermen took for Houdini and he remarked how remarkably well the spirits always dressed and how extremely well they posed for the camera.

I guess 21'st century spirits have changed their minds and try to avoid the camera at all costs!
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom