The north side evidence validated to the point of redundancy

[KoihimeNakamura]

Personally, I thought they were talking about that new derby sport myself..

 

[JimBenArm]

Interesting. And sad. Also can someone update me on my acronyms? I feel like a CT noob asking this, but what in the hell is CIT and PFT?

CIT = Citizen's Investigative Team. Kinda like a retarded Scooby-Do and gang.

PFT = Pilots For Truth. Kinda like a retarded CIT.

 

[Quad4_72]

"Citizens Investigative Team" and "Pilots for Truth."

I have different words for the acronyms, but they'd lead to a mod warning.

I know what Pilots for """""""""Truth""""""""" is but what the hell is a "Citizens investigative team"?

And yes the extra quotations are necessary for the word "truth" in CF terms.

 

[CurtC]

I liked the photo - the caption should read

R.I.P.
North Side Flyover Craziness

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

There has to be a point where logical rational individuals choose to accept evidence rather than deny it.

How much validation will it take before you accept this evidence?

The north side evidence is not a theory. It is what all the witnesses unanimously report.

The number of north side witness accounts has now increased to 13 and the critical independently confirmed flyover witness account of Roosevelt Roberts Jr. has now been released.

View evidence here.
[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/newopeningimage.jpg[/qimg]

The initial reaction and seemingly unanimous consensus regarding the citgo witnesses presented in The PentaCon from the "skeptic" community here at jref has been that they were all innocently mistaken in the exact same way.

Does it really make sense to suggest that such a drastic mistake could be repeated over and over?

If the citgo witnesses were a strange coincidental fluke can you honestly continue to tell yourself that this fluke has been repeated 9 more times from different perspectives while not a single independently confirmed south side account exists?

Reheat tried to suggest that the "NoC flight path is impossible" but in order to do so he had to rely on the notion that there was no visble bank or wing tilt reported from the witnesses.

This is no longer the case as the north side bank has not only been documented and corroborated by the ANC workers but also by heliport air traffic controller Sean Boger.

Of course the citgo witnesses did not see the plane on the approach like the Arlington Cemetery workers did from the area right in front of the maintenance buildings which is why one set of witnesses saw the bank while the others did not.

Furthermore the approach speed has now been established as significantly slower than reported by the NTSB or estimated from previous accounts.

William Middleton and Sean Boger are very valuable corroborating witnesses to this slower speed.

Naturally this and the now definitive bank changes the entire dynamic of Reheat’s paper rendering it irrelevant to the evidence presented.

In light of this new evidence the true critical thinkers in this forum will be left with a choice. You can join Caustic Logic as the sole individual willing to accuse the witnesses of being operatives sent out to deliberately lie while taking part in a vast disinfo conspiracy to incorrectly demonstrate the official story false……or you can accept the undeniable implications of this clearly fatal contradiction to the official 9/11 narrative and join the true skeptics, CIT, in their quest to uncover this military deception and expose the fraudulent permanent global war on terror.

All the knocked over lamp posts were on the south side of the citgo.

Physical evidence > eyewitnesses.

U R bedunked.

 

[Pardalis]

Total number of people who care beyond the CIT crew= 0

 

[Hokulele]

Well, considering that "redundant" usually implies "unnecessary", I would have to say they at least got the title of the thread correct.

 

[beachnut]

I only have this to say about that. - CIT = false ideas

Not one witness said north side in 2001 or 2002. What we have here is…
Pure failure and anyone who has not listened to their witnesses in 2001 and 2002 to hear them DEBUNK everything CIT stands for, and still make OPs like this are pure stupid on this topic.

EXAMPLE FOR OP doltish statement. Boger is used by CIT. He sees 77 hit the Pentagon. A CIT witness debunks you, and CIT. Makes you and CIT lairs on this point about not hitting!

Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building." "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."

Let me cut some so you can see the meaning of "watched it hit the building". Which part of "hit the building" are you unable to grasp with your super skeptical MIND?

Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "… I just watched it hit the building." "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."

Failed ideas, proven wrong in 2001! How is that for debunking? Sean debunks you from 2001! Hundreds of people DO! Sean never said north of CITGO in 2001 because he watched the plane HIT. The lamppost also tell us 77 hit them. There are parts of 77 that fell off hitting the lamppost and the VOT camera post, but you are not smart enough to research 9/11 more than repeating doltish lies and false information.

I doubt CIT knows what north means, they have problems with math and physics and geometry. CIT has no clue what parallel means, why do you think north means anything?
Are CIT lives are in danger for exposing how dumb they are?

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

TLB, who I think is Aldo, or a close friend...

I don't know who it is, nor do I care.

People who have been employed as a Disk Jockey all look alike to me.

 

[Athyrio]

Gee, this breaking news story on an internet message board. How will the big boys of NBC, ABC, and FOX ever keep up?

 

[TC329]

You can join Caustic Logic as the sole individual willing to accuse the witnesses of being operatives sent out to deliberately lie while taking part in a vast disinfo conspiracy to incorrectly demonstrate the official story false…….

so this is why the guy cleans toilets for a living?

 

[TC329]

All the knocked over lamp posts were on the south side of the citgo.

Physical evidence > eyewitnesses.

U R bedunked.

you haven't explained what knocked those light poles down because not a single eyewitness saw it happen.

U R debunked. [Edited for civility]

Edited for rule 11.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady

 

[jhunter1163]

In light of this new evidence the true critical thinkers in this forum will be left with a choice. You can join Caustic Logic as the sole individual willing to accuse the witnesses of being operatives sent out to deliberately lie while taking part in a vast disinfo conspiracy to incorrectly demonstrate the official story false……or you can accept the undeniable implications of this clearly fatal contradiction to the official 9/11 narrative and join the true skeptics, CIT, in their quest to uncover this military deception and expose the fraudulent permanent global war on terror.

I choose Drudgewire's Option 3.

 

[Drudgewire]

Gee, this breaking news story on an internet message board. How will the big boys of NBC, ABC, and FOX ever keep up?

We're all part of the same cover-up. In fact, time to come clean... I'm really Katie Couric.

 

[jhunter1163]

you haven't explained what knocked those light poles down because not a single eyewitness saw it happen.

Lagasse saw it happen. He even sent Dick Eastman an e-mail saying exactly that. Afework Hagos saw it happen too. So did Lloyd England.

 

[applecorped]

you haven't explained what knocked those light poles down because not a single eyewitness saw it happen.

Bigfoot knocked the light poles down. I saw it but no one else did because they were all watching the plane hit the Pentagon.

 

[The Big Dog]

So, all your witnesses still say the plane hit the Pentagon?

Yup.

CIT = FAIL.

 

[pomeroo]

There has to be a point where logical rational individuals choose to accept evidence rather than deny it.

How much validation will it take before you accept this evidence?

The north side evidence is not a theory. It is what all the witnesses unanimously report.

You have been caught lying again. In fairness, as you are a fantasist, the possibility exists that you are unfamiliar with the words "all" and "unanimously."


{snip-dishonest drivel}


So, when will you ignorant liars ask one of your "witnesses" which of his mutually-exclusive assertions he is willing to abandon? You must be tired of hearing this by now. But, do bear in mind, if you weren't complete frauds and you actually took your nonsense to a real news outlet, it would be the first question you were asked.

 

[Mr. Skinny]

I certainly appreciate the fact that the OP (TLB) broke the post into easy to read paragraphs/statements.

Thanks, TLB.

 

[pomeroo]

you haven't explained what knocked those light poles down because not a single eyewitness saw it happen.

U R debunked. [Edited for civility].

Ah, yes, WE are debunked. In the meantime, AA Flight 77 was hijacked by jihadists and flown into the Pentagon, as is PROVED by the calls made from the doomed plane, the wreckage of the aircraft found inside the building and on the lawn, the remains of the passengers and crew also found inside the Pentagon and identified by DNA testing, and the eyewitness accounts of roughly 100 people.

By contrast, your tiny group of low-IQ liars claims to have witnesses who describe an impossible flight path but insist, nevertheless, that they saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

Edited by chillzero: 

Edited for civility