skiba
Thinker
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 162
Pixy, Glad we can still agree on so many thing.
Lets get to the ones we dont.
So, cause and effect constructed in a specific manner = experience?
This gives no explanation why it's not all "happening in the dark" as a mere reaction
You got it mixed up here. I'm not talking about concept of experience, which is again more WORDS or information. I'm talking about the actual event of experience that you can have. "The experience of experiencing."
The experiencer, which is different from a blind string of reaction after reaction
Lets get to the ones we dont.
Experiences are information. Mechanical devices can encode and process information.
Yes.
That does not mean that physical systems cannot have experiences.
So, cause and effect constructed in a specific manner = experience?
This gives no explanation why it's not all "happening in the dark" as a mere reaction
Unfounded assumption. The fact that you might not be able to adequately define your concept of experience does not mean that the concept of experience cannot be adequately defined.
You got it mixed up here. I'm not talking about concept of experience, which is again more WORDS or information. I'm talking about the actual event of experience that you can have. "The experience of experiencing."
You keep saying that something is missing. You have yet to say what this something is. That's the problem of belief.
The experiencer, which is different from a blind string of reaction after reaction
Last edited: