July 2008 Stundies

[Mobyseven]

Golden, every one.

 

[tsig]

Aldo from CIT, err... CSI, in the comments on SLC, responding to my question as to how evidence could have been planted at the Pentagon:



http://www.haloscan.com/comments.php?user= screwloosechange &comment=8962114595542986174

Uhh, yeah, DNA matching wasn't exactly state-of-the-art in 1962...

All truthers seem to live in the ever present now, how things are are always the way the they have always been maybe it's youtube.

 

[Dave Rogers]

MaGZ commenting on the BBC Conspiracy Files programme on WTC7 (which he presumably hasn't even seen):

Reading from you post, the BBC obviously had a mindset when they made this.

As opposed to the more traditional truther approach of making a documentary without thinking at all.

Dave

 

[VespaGuy]

Admin, Lin Kuei, over at LCF is encouraged to ban a member (Hamba) simply for expressing a different opinion.

Lin Kuei responds: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/409466/4/

hey gaged we don't just ban people for debating, but in fairness Hamba you can do it to your heart's content in the skeptic's forum.

So they don't just ban folks from debating... they just encourage them to post in the Skeptics forum?

Four minutes later, Lin Kuei edits his post to add some clarification:

Hamba your account is now limited to this section

So, they don't ban people from the forum for debating, they just ban them from all of the sections of the forum (except one) for debating.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

So, they don't ban people from the forum for debating, they just ban them from all of the sections of the forum (except one) for debating.

LCF's Free Speech Zone...

 

[Grizzly Bear]

In response to the Wtc 7 photo of smoke: there is no fire in the windows where the smoke is supposedly being emitted? Here is proof taht the smoke was not produced by building 7 but rather it was produced by wtc 5 and 6 http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2007/200307building7.htm

Is anything like this stundie worthy?

 

[Mel Odious]

Is anything like this stundie worthy?

That's classic Stundie material, but I believe nominees must have been published in the current month to be eligible.

 

[R.Mackey]

Dabljuh explains the materials used in buildings:

Let me just point out for sake of education that there are so-called "heat resistant" steel alloys for use in buildings. These alloys have a different makeup than normal structural steel; the melting point is a little higher, but more importantly the Young's modulus as a function of temperature doesn't plateau until a higher temperature. Where A36 is down 50% in strength by 600^oC, heat resistant steel is only down about 30%.

Nonetheless, use of these steels is pretty rare, and none were used in either WTC 1, 2, or 7. Those were predominantly A36 and A42, though eight other high-strength grades were used in the Towers -- none of them specially heat resistant.

Carry on.

 

[Alareth]

That's classic Stundie material, but I believe nominees must have been published in the current month to be eligible.

No, they are eligible as long as they have not been nominated before.

 

[Horatius]

Evidence I have presented supporting the Missiles at Ground Zero:

Footage by Fox News taken by local cameraman. (To be discovered and released at a later date)

...

What an .... interesting ... definition of "presented" he has.

 

[rwguinn]

Let me just point out for sake of education that there are so-called "heat resistant" steel alloys for use in buildings. These alloys have a different makeup than normal structural steel; the melting point is a little higher, but more importantly the Young's modulus as a function of temperature doesn't plateau until a higher temperature. Where A36 is down 50% in strength by 600^oC, heat resistant steel is only down about 30%.

Nonetheless, use of these steels is pretty rare, and none were used in either WTC 1, 2, or 7. Those were predominantly A36 and A42, though eight other high-strength grades were used in the Towers -- none of them specially heat resistant.

Carry on.

I'll Take Inconel for 100, Alex...
Want to see the budget for that...

 

[Sabrina]

If I could provide a source for it other than my memory, I'd nominate my crazy lady from work who thought we had troops on Mars.

UC, can I nominate it anyway? Something that ludicrous DESERVES a Stundie!

 

[Mancman]

From the 9/11 Truth Facebook group:

In response to testimony of people in the WTC lobbies smelling jet fuel:

Just because people assumed what they saw was from the jet fuel doesn't mean it was.

Hardly any of the elevators run from where the planes were to the lobby (2, 3 max), Bryan is right.

Anyways, why don't you move onto my other points, i see your point, but i disagree. You have no proof that it was jet fuel. I don't care if it smelled like kerosene, obviously the planners could have thought to put kerosene in the explosives to make people think it was jet fuel.

Screenshot
Link - requires Facebook account.

 

[Blender Head]

From the 9/11 Truth Facebook group:

In response to testimony of people in the WTC lobbies smelling jet fuel:



Screenshot
Link - requires Facebook account.

That is hilarious! I imagine the fact that no one noticed hooded perps carrying containers of jet fuel-scented air fresheners hasn't put a damper on his belief?

My nomination is "CNN911Fake" on this video:

"[The FDNY] could have spen[t] [their] time saving people instead of setting up a useless monitoring device and evacuating the area."

Yeah what were they thinking trying to determine WTC 7's condition?!

 

[gumboot]

LCF's Free Speech Zone...

They accidentally set up a Speech Free Zone instead. Easy mistake to make.

 

[gumboot]

Cheap Shot recounts his interviews with the Department of Justice:

Since it was the interview with me personally by the DOJ that was the cause of the new timeline being generated for the 9-11 Commission, I don't remember them water boarding me to get info out of me, or pulling out my finger nails, I beleive I was in a nice cozy room, with my Union Rep sitting near by. As far as Guatanomo Bay are we stretching here or what.

Homeland Insurgency goes looking...

So you had a minder in the room?

He scores!

Yes, a "Union Rep" is a "minder".

 

[1337m4n]

Consider the source...

There may be nothing inherently Stundie-worthy about the statement itself, but when you consider the source, I think we have a winner:

I suppose what you do is insinuate or imply. Be man enough to have the courage to just state it plainly. No use lying about it.

 

[Unsecured Coins]

If I could provide a source for it other than my memory, I'd nominate my crazy lady from work who thought we had troops on Mars.

UC, can I nominate it anyway? Something that ludicrous DESERVES a Stundie!

I'll allow it

 

[Dubbi]

I think I found the winner.

"For the first time in the history of the twin towers, a power down occurs one week before the events of 9/11 occurred."

source: http://e3s.ca/t911truth/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=0

"Top 20 Anomalies
Written by Richard Harris
Wednesday, 07 November 2007"

This is something you read once you click on "9/11 facts".

 

[gdnp]

"For the first time in the history of the twin towers, a power down occurs one week before the events of 9/11 occurred."

source: http://e3s.ca/t911truth/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=0

"Top 20 Anomalies
Written by Richard Harris
Wednesday, 07 November 2007"

This is something you read once you click on "9/11 facts".

Wow. It gets you thinking.

You know, I ate a bag of Doritos for lunch last week, and today Derek Jeter hit a home run.

Coincidence? I think not!