JEROME - Black holes do not exist

[Terry]

Jerome, read a book about orbital mechanics, for ed sake. There's no point anyone trying to explain it to you, because you'll just nit-pick.

 

[Herzblut]

Is the object moving perpendicular to the force of gravity when it is not "falling"?

Why is the tripulation of the ISS weightless?

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Jerome, read a book about orbital mechanics, for ed sake. There's no point anyone trying to explain it to you, because you'll just nit-pick.

Statement of fact without understanding and explanation just get a pass?


Interesting.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Why is the tripulation of the ISS weightless?

I am sorry, is the highlighted word the correct word?

If so, I do not understand the question.

 

[Herzblut]

I am sorry, is the highlighted word the correct word?

Interesting. If there's no latin-based 'tripulation' in English, then read 'crew':

Why is the crew of the ISS weightless?

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Why is the tripulation of the ISS weightless?

Because gravity is not acting discernibly on the craft.

 

[Herzblut]

Because gravity is not acting discernibly on the craft.

Why not?

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Why not?

Because gravity is not strong enough.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Interesting. If there's no latin-based 'tripulation' in English, then read 'crew':

The word reads like dancing or celebrating.

Are you translating German to English?

 

[Herzblut]

Because gravity is not strong enough.

Why is 90% of g not strong enough?

 

[Herzblut]

The word reads like dancing or celebrating.

Are you translating German to English?

That is stolen from Spanish. The German word is 'Besatzung'.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Why is 90% of g not strong enough?

Because that is what the data shows.


This is just evidence that the force of gravity did not and does not hold thing together.


The universe was not built with gravity and is not held together with gravity.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

That is stolen from Spanish.

The Spanish language would equate a group of people with dancing and celebrating.


You can learn a great deal about a culture by how they transform words.

 

[Terry]

Statement of fact without understanding and explanation just get a pass?

That's not it, at all. My point is, that unless you read the full details of how it works, rather than a decent off-the-cuff summary that you'd most likely get from someone posting here, you will point to some tiny mal-phrasing and claim that it is a gaping hole in Einstein's theory. Or post a gnome or something.

 

[X]

Do you fall back down to the Earth when you jump, Jerome?

If you throw a ball into the air, does it come down?

What do you think causes this?

Since an acceleration is involved (measured and confirmed repeatedly and easily), there must be a force acting on the object cast into the sky.

This force causes an acceleration.

Scientists choose to call this force gravity.


The ISS follows the exact same path predicted (and counted upon) if it were to be acted on by this thing scientist call gravity.

But, plainly, you don't think gravity is strong enough.

So there must be some other force, that acts in the exact same way gravity does, has the exact same effects as gravity, but is stronger. Since it is stringer, it will overwhelm small-scale applications such as jumping and throwing a ball.

So what is it scientists have been observing, measuring, calculating, and relying upon for hundreds of years, and which we mistakenly labelled "gravity"?


To give you a chance to answer, Jerome, I'm taking you off ignore. Please don't make me regret it.

 

[Terry]

Because gravity is not acting discernibly on the craft.

What do you propose is keeping it travelling in that elliptical path then? Angels pushing it inwards?

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

That is stolen from Spanish. The German word is 'Besatzung'.

You added the last sentence after my last post.

From that German word I get: garrison, crew, occupying forces


Languages are wonderful, are they not?

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

That's not it, at all. My point is, that unless you read the full details of how it works, rather than a decent off-the-cuff summary that you'd most likely get from someone posting here, you will point to some tiny mal-phrasing and claim that it is a gaping hole in Einstein's theory. Or post a gnome or something.

I am not playing Gottcha'.


Although, if someone is unable to explain what they "know to be true", than are they not just practicing faith?

 

[Terry]

I am not playing Gottcha'.

Your behavior to me seems to contradictthat statement.

 

[Herzblut]

Because that is what the data shows.

What data? Data just shows the crew is weightless.

This is just evidence that the force of gravity did not and does not hold thing together.

If gravity does not hold together my feet and the ground under them, who does?