Conspiracy liars are the among the dumbest humans on the planet, but there are limits to everything. No one, not even you, wants another Norman Mineta thread. You may noticed an overabundance of them. In case you've been in a coma for the last five years, Mineta's timeline was discredited. He is off by more than a half-hour. NO plane was fifty, or thirty, or ten miles out. They were hearing about a projected flight path for what turned out to have been Flight 93.
Andrews Air Force Base on 9/11
- Thread starter roundhead
- Start date
Conspiracy liars are the among the dumbest humans on the planet, but there are limits to everything. No one, not even you, wants another Norman Mineta thread. You may noticed an overabundance of them. In case you've been in a coma for the last five years, Mineta's timeline was discredited. He is off by more than a half-hour. NO plane was fifty, or thirty, or ten miles out. They were hearing about a projected flight path for what turned out to have been Flight 93.
Consider your bluff called.
Says you, which means, so what.
What i find interesting about the Mineta testimony("aside from the testimony itself, which is corraborated in several ways)is the fcat zero mention of it found its way into the commision report, but 9:58 did, mysteriously, and his testimony that he did give vanished from the site. If its full of beans why strike it from public view, not that it is of course.
What kind of hopelessly obtuse fool can have it explained to him in precise detail by people who served in the military on 9/11 why there was no stand-down and still mindlessly persist in insiting that there was a stand-down?
As always, you have failed to dispute anything written by people far smarter and more knowledgeable than yourself. Your fingers remain stuck in your ears, your eyes are closed tightly, and you are screeching loudly.
Why is it missing from the archives...."a snafu"...i have to admit, thats one of the best excuses of this whole carnival.
Do you think that it was I who destroyed Mineta's testimony? Would you allow for the possibility that all the other witnesses and the phone logs might have played a role? As you are unwilling or unable to read the flood of material on this topic that has been posted here, a link to Mike W's invaluable site will do you little good:
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Norman_Mineta
Last edited:
Stop these infantile lies, dunces. You know that Mineta's testimony was discredited and judged unworthy of inclusion in the final report.
C'mon, liar, who said it was a "snafu"? Let's hear a name.
responded to the wrong post
Lets have it????
Prove i wasnt in the military. And as you wont, i expect an apology at that point, fair enough.
But, you forget that he is not merely stupid: he is aggressively stupid. He is--LastChild!
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
People, please, it doesn't matter whether Roundhead was in the Navy or not. What matters is whether the information in question is correct or not. The veracity of information is independent of the people discussing it. Hopefully, we can concentrate on substantive items, such as the contrast between the timeline and his and Bio's unsupported assertions regarding the response.
It's simple: Is the info right or wrong? That's the standard to meet here.
It's simple: Is the info right or wrong? That's the standard to meet here.
You said that you would offer up proof of your military service, as shown in my quoted post. Lets see it.
Drudgewire
Critical Doofus
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,421
You took out the cartoon character line after I went through all the trouble of finding a good Deputy Dawg picture.
Here it is--right between the eyes:
You have never posted, and never will post, anything that suggests the slightest familiarity with the workings of the military. Your uninformed nonsense is cribbed from twoofer sites created by agenda-driven fools. Your response to knowledgeable criticisms of your fabrications is to ignore everything and continue to blather mindlessly. You know absolutely nothing about military procedures.
Now you are with the enemy, blaming your own brothers and sisters in the service for 9/11. That makes you a traitor who does not care for the facts and evidence, you just spew the lies of 9/11 truth. Like your supersonic U-2, your ideas are all off! You have lost the edge, if you ever had it. Now you are pure false information person serving the very terrorist that take credit without making up lies like 9/11 truth does. Even the terrorist are not as clue less as your false information.
Hero, to zero evidence; how long did that take?
With major errors in logic, and fact, you have exposed you lack knowledge on how the military works. Why do you lack so much knowledge on a topic you were part of? Why are you so ignorant of military doctrine and employment? Looks like you were a small cog in the military machine, with zero knowledge, save your duties.
Now you turn on the military spewing lies and hearsay, post after post. Why; what happen to your ability, if you ever had it, to think logically, and make rational conclusions?
And as it goes, your ideas were debunked a long time ago!
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Andrews_Air_Force_Base
DEBUNKED!!!
Armed with hearsay! Next time try facts. Failure is yours.
Last edited:
Personally, I believe it is relevant, as he has used himself as a source at least twice now.
This link is from Prison planet, but i suspect its elsewhere as well, it was just the first that cme up in the search...so
Mineta’s Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) testimony was also edited out of the 9/11 Commission video archive.
When questioned about this, representatives at the National Archive stated that the video may have been lost because of a ‘snafu’. Following is a brief summary of the scrubbed video along with links to recently obtained C-SPAN video.
His testimony is super credible, and actually Cheney gives it more substance on TV.
His testimony only reinforces what i already knew. 9/11 was planned, intercept protocol was rewritten just before 9/11 so Cheney and Rummy could call the shots regarding the standdown, and it pretty much drives a nail in Cheney as a murderer.
Once Kean and Roemer heard it, they knew the cat was out of the bag. I bet 2 in 10 people are even aware of this testimony and its repercussions.
I have watched it, its extremely credible, Cheneys narrative in the bunker is incriminating, and sweeping it under the rug is rightly imperative to the oficial lie. I understand the worry from lie zealots.
Last edited:
applecorped
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 20,145
Nobody gives a rat's patoot about some video archive. Mineta's testimony is readily available and it was deliberately omitted from the 9/11 Commission's final report because it had been discredited. You have never succeeded in conning anybody here. Why should this time around be any different?