• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Here is one rescue worker who was "in on it"

What makes you think he ever left? He may have posted in this thread already after he was banned. As a recent or new sock. Ron and I have believed for quite some time that theauthor was pdoh76.

I started suspecting as much recently, when I felt that it became so obvious it was painful.
 
Please quote Mr. Rodriguez claiming to see the actual bombs or explosives. He's claimed to see explosions, but I don't recall any instance where he claims to see the actual charges or bombs.

Thank you for further proving the point.
 
The point is that Mackey misrepresented his position. Never has Rodriguez claimed to have actually seen the explosives or charges.


We certainly can't have anyone's position misrepresented. Next thing you know, lying morons will start pretending that Larry Silverstein was talking about controlled demolition when he agreed with the FDNY commander that the rescue operation should be pulled.
 
Damage to the towers having other side effects... cars were being ignited by materials raining down from the impact areas... people described bodies hitting the ground as sounding like explosions... given the situation the possibilities of sounds coming from sources other than bombs is exceedingly high... Gas lines rupturing during the tower's collapse, water lines rupturing during the collapse... literally hundreds of sources of sounds.... Is that not relevant in any way to your interpretation of events?


My favorites:

"The Scott cylinders and the oxygen cylinders were all letting go. They were blowing up left and right."

- FDNY Firefighter Todd Heaney on 9/11

And

Wilshire telco building 2005 fire

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/...wilshire_upgrades_power_after_disruption.html

"....A physical shaking was felt by all in the building, and then the
nightmare began ..."Explosion, ....." Buss Duct #1 had experienced
a catastrophic failure. ...a billowing cloud of atomized concrete
began to fill the stairwells, with audible fire alarms adding to a
bizarre effect.

The explosion was contained within a small area, although there was
a high level of damage to concrete and surrounding electrical
equipment. Although

http://www.datacenterdynamics.com/ME2/Audiences/
dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%
3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=
4&id=DC85C92C784E403CA42BEEBDA75CE71A&AudID=32E4C5E91CD
B40D59E134C9FF4713F9C

http://preview.tinyurl.com/339ua4


Were there really oxygen bottles in any quantity? Maybe EMT bottles?

High pressure gas bottles can do real damage. Ask any Scuba diver for war stories. One of times in my life when I though I was about to die involved the dropping of some industrial gas bottles.
 
We certainly can't have anyone's position misrepresented. Next thing you know, lying morons will start pretending that Larry Silverstein was talking about controlled demolition when he agreed with the FDNY commander that the rescue operation should be pulled.

What rescue operation?
 
If a fellow insists humiliating himself by perpetually defending a straightforwardly absurd notion, is it in any way immoral or improper to draw that matter out? I want to know if the marginal pleasure I find in RedIbis defending the “pull it” issue is a guilty one.
 
If a fellow insists humiliating himself by perpetually defending a straightforwardly absurd notion, is it in any way immoral or improper to draw that matter out? I want to know if the marginal pleasure I find in RedIbis defending the “pull it” issue is a guilty one.



I know that it's immature, insensitive, cruel, mean-spirited, etc., but I just get such a kick out of watching these agenda-driven jackasses tie themselves into knots desperately trying to sustain their baseless slander of a man who did absolutely nothing wrong. Their lies have been blown out of water and still they are compelled to go through the motions. Evil people looking really pathetic and stupid: what could beat that?
 
Last edited:
I know that it's immature, insensitive, cruel, mean-spirited, etc., but I just get such a kick out of watching these agenda-driven jackasses tie themselves into knots desperately trying to sustain their baseless slander of a man who did absolutely nothing wrong. Their lies have been blown out of water and still they are compelled to go through the motions. Evil people looking really pathetic and stupid: what could beat that?

Hm, let's see!

hefeweizen.jpg


+

Deutschland-Oesterreich.jpg


;)
 
I know that it's immature, insensitive, cruel, mean-spirited, etc., but I just get such a kick out of watching these agenda-driven jackasses tie themselves into knots desperately trying to sustain their baseless slander of a man who did absolutely nothing wrong. Their lies have been blown out of water and still they are compelled to go through the motions. Evil people looking really pathetic and stupid: what could beat that?

If we share nothing else, it's the mutual appreciation for such elicited responses.

I'm sincerely impressed with what brazen irony you use the phrase "agenda-driven jackasses" when completely derailing yet another thread with a very dead horse. Pure entertainment, that's why I like your show.
 
well, it would help that you stop abandoning threads to which you are painted into a corner and answer questions put forth to you. but since you dont like it when people call you out on your lies, they have to find you where you post frequently, to get your attention and call you to attention to those questions you've left unanswered.

so when are you going to give a solid answer to the questions put forth to you?
 
The point is that Mackey misrepresented his position. Never has Rodriguez claimed to have actually seen the explosives or charges.

And you correcting him only further proves his claim. That no one saw any bombs. Thank you. He was trying to throw a bone, but you slapped it down. Thank you.
 
Do you see those large blocks of text under my name? That's where I say all that I can possibly say on that subject.


That’s likely true. When it comes to my question, you’ve said all you possibly can say on the matter – nothing.
 
Your crossthread stalking is obnoxious and immature.


Oh, yes. Sure. It’s you who’re the victim here. You merely want to slander an innocent man in peace, yet you’re brutally harassed by unwelcome questions. You’re like Ghandi, really, or even Jesus – such dignity in the face of ruthless oppression.

Who do you hope to convince, exactly?
 

Back
Top Bottom