Here is one rescue worker who was "in on it"

[jhunter1163]

*sigh*

Danny Jowenko was shown the WTC7 collapse video without any other information at all, and agreed that it did appear to be a CD. When he found out the truth of the matter, he refused (and still refuses) to discuss the matter any further, I suspect out of embarrassment.

As DGM also pointed out, Jowenko does not believe either WTC1 or 2 were CDs.

 

[Myriad]

Incorrect.
Copy paste the link below to see a fireman say bomb in the building (I cannot add URLs yet)
youtube.com/watch?v=W53wdu8IGlE

or google.video.com - "Fireman: Bomb In The Building"

And what building is the firefighter referring to?

Can you point out any of the WTC buildings in that video?

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[mrbaracuda]

Incorrect.
Copy paste the link below to see a fireman say bomb in the building (I cannot add URLs yet)
youtube.com/watch?v=W53wdu8IGlE

or google.video.com - "Fireman: Bomb In The Building"

Hm,




Next!

 

[Bobert]

So a CD "expert" can be misled?
Shouldn't all CD experts agree on one opinion?

sorry what is your point?

 

[Drs_Res]

And guess what else, there was NO bomb in the building.

 

[R.Mackey]

And what building is the firefighter referring to?

Can you point out any of the WTC buildings in that video?

... and did the firefighter actually see a bomb?

This is just like Swing who attempted to refute with newspaper articles, speculating that one possible theory, early on, involved secondary explosives. There is an enormous difference between this an an eyewitness to bombs or explosives.

Please pay attention.

 

[Russ_Dalton]

Corroborating evidence.

Eyewitnesses talk about bombs, firefighters talk about bombs, building collapses similar to a CD. Stephen Jones results about thermate. Strong history of elements US govt being involved in clandestine operations and strong history of elements of US govt to go to significant extent to justify war. And a careless alleged confession by KSM.

Its a pretty strong evidence to re-investigate, considering that trillions of dollars are being spent based on 911.

 

[Russ_Dalton]

sorry what is your point?

Why would CD experts disagree on any of the WTC collapses?

 

[Elizabeth I]

Well, tomblvd called it when he said TA wouldn't be back:

theauthor has been banned as a sockpuppet of
pdoherty76.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=115998

ETA: you must admit he had a pretty good run, though...

 

[DGM]

Eyewitnesses talk about bombs, firefighters talk about bombs, building collapses similar to a CD. Stephen Jones results about thermate. Strong history of elements US govt being involved in clandestine operations and strong history of elements of US govt to go to significant extent to justify war. And a careless alleged confession by KSM.

Its a pretty strong evidence to re-investigate, considering that trillions of dollars are being spent based on 911.

Steven Jones has no results that I'm aware off (lots of speculation and interruption). Care to show results?

 

[mrbaracuda]

Well, tomblvd called it when he said TA wouldn't be back:



http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=115998

ETA: you must admit he had a pretty good run, though...

Quick answer to "Who is this pdoherty?" please? I noticed the name coming up over and over again. Is there something special (heh, yea, apart from that) about him or is that just his original nick name?

 

[Tomblvd]

Eyewitnesses talk about bombs, firefighters talk about bombs, building collapses similar to a CD. Stephen Jones results about thermate. Strong history of elements US govt being involved in clandestine operations and strong history of elements of US govt to go to significant extent to justify war. And a careless alleged confession by KSM.

Its a pretty strong evidence to re-investigate, considering that trillions of dollars are being spent based on 911.

People saw bombs? Where?

Can you point to a building collapse that didn't "look like a CD"?

What are Stephen Jones' results about thermate?

If this was a false-flag operation to invade Iraq, why not directly implicate Iraq?

What is a "careless alleged confession"? What does that even mean?

Its a pretty strong evidence to re-investigate

Please look up the definition of corroborating evidence. I don't think it means what you think it does.

 

[Elizabeth I]

Quick answer to "Who is this pdoherty?" please? I noticed the name coming up over and over again. Is there something special (heh, yea, apart from that) about him or is that just his original nick name?

Others on the board know more about him than I do - my membership started about the time his was ending for (I think) the first time. I think that he has attempted the sock puppet tactic several times since then, and generally been caught sooner than this time.

 

[Minadin]

Please--what do you think "theauthor" has been doing all day? Give the lad a break.

Given that your suspicions were correct, is it safe to assume that he wasn't exactly straining himself?



That is all.

 

[Russ_Dalton]

Hm,

Next!

The firefighter says: "area of the school". He wasn't sure where the bomb was. He was told by his supervisors to clear the area.

Also google :
"Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11"

youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related

 

[pomeroo]

Brad said: "The seismic argument is debunked by the controlled demolition industry itself as they have the technology to CD a building without seismic registration."

How can you debunk him, when you say: "Protec had seismic devices in place throughout the WTC complex".

Wheater there were devices or not is irrelevant, because the controlled demolition industry has the technology to CD a building without seismic registration.

Am I evil, brain-dead, too? Perhabs you have more information, instead...

I gotta admit, a fantasist in 2008 who has never heard of Brent Blanchard's Protec paper is a novelty. Conspiracy liars usually try pretending that the paper has been "refuted," although, for obvious reasons, they never get around to explaining exactly how:

http://www.jod911.com/WTC COLLAPSE STUDY BBlanchard 8-8-06.pdf

 

[mrbaracuda]

The firefighter says: "area of the school". He wasn't sure where the bomb was. He was told by his supervisors to clear the area.

And?

Also google :
"Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11"

youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related

No. Why?
And answer Myriad.

 

[332nd]

The firefighter says: "area of the school". He wasn't sure where the bomb was. He was told by his supervisors to clear the area.

Also google :
"Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11"

youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related

Did the bomb go off? Was it deactivated? What ever happened to that bomb?

 

[mrbaracuda]

Others on the board know more about him than I do - my membership started about the time his was ending for (I think) the first time. I think that he has attempted the sock puppet tactic several times since then, and generally been caught sooner than this time.

So he's not some of the crazy head figures of the twoof movement like that Haupt guy or uh, whatever his name was. Luke.. something.

 

[Russ_Dalton]

People saw bombs? Where?

Can you point to a building collapse that didn't "look like a CD"?

What are Stephen Jones' results about thermate?

If this was a false-flag operation to invade Iraq, why not directly implicate Iraq?

What is a "careless alleged confession"? What does that even mean?



Please look up the definition of corroborating evidence. I don't think it means what you think it does.

Google earthquaqe collapses.

WTC debris showed thermate. Thats corroborative

Iraq was just part of the whole war plan. Read PNAC, where they talk about continued US military presence, Oil control etc.

KSM arrested in 2003 claims to confess to attack plaza bank among other buildings in his confession when the plaza bank itself was given its name in 2006.

Show me your corroborative evidence implicating the 19 arabs, KSM and Bin laden. May be I`l get a better understanding of corroborative evidence.