If a car comes flying by and someone says he must be doin 100 it doesn't mean he is. He could be doing 75. It is an estimate based on observation.
That's true enough, and if you were to talk to the driver of the car at the time and he were to tell you he was doing 80mph and the driver passed him then you have a baseline for approximation.
TC329 said:
Purely speculation and not anything that will get anyone convicted in a courtroom. But if the eyewitness also notes the car is driving against traffic then it's pretty safe to say that is the claim that will stick in court. This is no different.
Well there's the fact we're not in a courtroom, and the fact I am asking you what the witnesses you have talked to have said, not what you believe.
TC329 said:
Why am i "avoiding" this?
Did I use the word "avoiding"? I thought I used the word "resisting" which is what I think you are doing?
TC329 said:
I don't know where the plane flew precisely.
Did it fly over Paik?
Did it fly to the north of the Citgo?
TC329 said:
I dont know the precise speed of the plane.
What speeds / times to impact have your witnesses stated?
TC329 said:
I dont know the precise altitude of the plane.
That's ok I don't need to add that to an analysis until much later on if at all.
TC329 said:
I dont know if it shot over the Pentagon to the north or south of the "impact".
Sean Boger's account would limit the area it could possibly pass to basically exactly the damaged area. It would seem so anyway.
TC329 said:
I don't know where it was when Officer Roosevelt saw it.
I thought we were discussing pre-impact?
TC329 said:
I've been around this too long to get set up.
How am I trying to set you up? Have you got any evidence of this or are you potentially being a little paranoid?
TC329 said:
What I do know is that the plane approached over the Navy Annex on the NoC which is irreconcilable with the mechanical damage path. None of which seems to have been witnessed by any of these witnesses.
Odd, don't you agree in the slightest?
I guess so, the amount of corroboration you have managed to find for at least the NoC theory sounds impressive at first, but I am beginning to doubt your sampling methods. That's why I am beginning from a very simple start, using only three requirements for a flight path and giving your case as much leeway as possible.