The World Trade Center did not "turn to dust", stop repeating this lie

[theauthor]

*sigh* ...here we go.

Okay, theauthor; tell us, then, what was it that "pulverized" 220 acres of concrete?

Umm gravity....don't you even know that?

 

[DaN K. StAnLeY]

That's a statue: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/12/ltm.04.html

Okay, whew, I was wondering if that guy made it or not. You can't really tell because of the soot or whatever.

 

[Alt+F4]

Thats a lie. He said "There's no concrete...the concrete was pulverized."

Hey the people who do the transcripts over at CNN must be "in on it" because that's what the transcript says, "concrete was pulverized".

YouTube is blocked at my job, so I can't compare.

 

[pomeroo]

Umm gravity....don't you even know that?

Put on your thinking cap--this is deep stuff.

People here are asking you to LOOK AT THE PICTURES.

If you do this, you will notice that not all of the concrete at the WTC complex was pulverized. You can pretend not to notice, but we won't be fooled.

Trust me, you never fool us.

 

[DaN K. StAnLeY]

Does anyone have any pictures of large pieces of concrete being extracted from WTC 1 or 2 sites? I wan't to copy them for reference, and I know I've seen some.

 

[T.A.M.]

1. Most of the dust cloud was the sheetrock (you know, wall board) that the WTCs, as OFFICE BUILDINGS, were FULL OF.

2. There are pics out there that show not only large rocks of concrete, but also many other large, NON-PULVERIZED pieces of debris.

3. It is not surprising that a LARGE amount of the concrete would be turned to dust once hitting the ground, anyway.

TAM

 

[Alzke]

Does anyone have any pictures of large pieces of concrete being extracted from WTC 1 or 2 sites? I wan't to copy them for reference, and I know I've seen some.

*crickets*

 

[Alzke]

1
2. There are pics out there that show not only large rocks of concrete, but also many other large, NON-PULVERIZED pieces of debris.

From either of the Towers, or from the "complex" (hat tip Ron Wieck)?

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Does anyone have any pictures of large pieces of concrete being extracted from WTC 1 or 2 sites? I wan't to copy them for reference, and I know I've seen some.

Here's one: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/hanger17/meteor1.jpg

 

[twinstead]

Here's one: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/hanger17/meteor1.jpg

Oh, using that image is a nice touch!

 

[Quad4_72]

What happened to this concrete when subjected to high amounts of compression?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl0d06dQPgE&feature=related

Or this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLBRugxkiT8&feature=related

Or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RwWimEhFUc&feature=related

They are probably NWO vids though. I am sure there were explosives planted somewhere in those slabs. How else could the concrete have been turned to dust?

 

[1337m4n]

Thats a lie. He said "There's no concrete...the concrete was pulverized."

Show me where he says that.

 

[1337m4n]

Umm gravity....don't you even know that?

You're sure it wasn't outer space laser beams or magic demolition explosives or mini-nukes?

 

[steve s]

The steel didnt turn to dust but virtually all the concrete did.

The only concrete was in the floor slabs. Are you suggesting that they wired up the floors with explosives? If so, what the hell for? Blowing the steel columns would have been sufficient to take down the buildings.


Steve S.

 

[~enigma~]

Does anyone have any pictures of large pieces of concrete being extracted from WTC 1 or 2 sites? I wan't to copy them for reference, and I know I've seen some.

Oddly enough in the picture the wooish idiots point to show that the columns were cut there is concrete chunks in the foreground...

 

[Mel Odious]

Here's another collection of g.z. pics which I thought might be of interest:

http://www.zombietime.com/wtc_9-13-2001/

I found this link, strangely enough, over at David Icke's forums whilst I was Stundie-hunting. Excellent pictures, though.

 

[gumboot]

Really? You dont think the gvernor of New York, while standing at ground zero, wouldnt know? You know more?

Well I think he wouldn't know. I think he wouldn't have a frikken clue. You expect a politician, standing at the edge of acres of debris extending multiple stories deep, would have even the most remote notion of what that debris pile contained?

Laughable.

Phillips and Jordan Inc certainly thought there was plenty of concrete in the debris pile, and they should know - they were the company responsible for managing removal of debris from the WTC and crime scene support services.

 

[Profanz]

Dust?

What dust? I don't see any dust. Crazy twoofers.

 

[TheRedWorm]

Are you really that disingenuous?

 

[chillzero]

Is anybody arguing that there was no dust? Because I didn't think so.

I thought the discussion was whether there was anything concrete larger than dust in the debris.