• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

What is Crackamite?

TruthByDecree

Banned
T
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
138
http://www.crackamite.com/crackamite.html

Crackamite is a soundless, non-explosive and safe demolition agent, which is quite different from ordinary demolition agents such as explosives and dangerous materials.It does not cause any explosion, noise, ground vibration, gas, dust or any other environmental pollution when used properly.

Crackamite is a non-toxic powder consisting of oxides of calcium, silicon and aluminum. The chemical composition of Crack-a-mite is a powder consisting of an inorganic compound made mainly of a special kind of silicate and an organic compound. Crackamite does not contain any harmful components.
Click to expand...

How does this stuff work chemically speaking? Could the WTC have stood with this stuff drilled into the floors until the upper block fell or something shook the building? What effect would compromising the concrete floors have on the steel columns and the ability of the building to remain standing? Immediate? And calcium, silicon, and aluminum, wouldn’t be anything considered unusual if detected afterwards would it?
 
TruthByDecree said:
http://www.crackamite.com/crackamite.html



How does this stuff work chemically speaking? Could the WTC have stood with this stuff drilled into the floors until the upper block fell or something shook the building? What effect would compromising the concrete floors have on the steel columns and the ability of the building to remain standing? Immediate? And calcium, silicon, and aluminum, wouldn’t be anything considered unusual if detected afterwards would it?
Click to expand...
Hiding the thousands of holes you would need to drill in the concrete would be tough. Wouldn't be something no one would notice.

ETA It expands with lots of pressure.
http://www.crackamite.com/working.html
 
Last edited:
one problem...best I can tell from the site you linked, it does squat with STEEL.

TAM:)
 
lol

You better apply for a Pulitzer Prize. Wait; darn; the WTC was built with steel. Darn. You almost had the Prize.
 
AS far as I can tell the concrete in the towers didn't play any part in the structural support system. It wasn't holding anything up, so breaking it apart wouldn't make anything fall down. Am I wrong?
 
TruthByDecree said:
What is Crackamite?
Click to expand...


marmite_vegemite_crackers.jpg
 
Brainache said:
AS far as I can tell the concrete in the towers didn't play any part in the structural support system. It wasn't holding anything up, so breaking it apart wouldn't make anything fall down. Am I wrong?
Click to expand...

You are correct, IIRC. The OP, however, is a wonderful example of trying to find anything to make the incongruent, ever increasingly complex truther narrative a little less so.

TAM:)
 
website said:
Marble, granite, limestone, plain concrete, reinforced concrete, boulders, and ledge are fractured overnight without noise, vibration, or flying debris.
Click to expand...

Do you see "steel" there? Also, look at "fractured overnight". If it takes a night long to fracture steel, then it would have taken a helluva long time to crack steel. Besides, if steel started to crack a day or two before 9/11, it could have been noticed.
 
Let's also consider its mechanism:

After Crackamite is poured into holes drilled in rocks or concrete, the expansive stress gradually increases with time, and reaches to more than 11,000 T/m2 at room temperature after 24 hours. As Crackamite generates its expansive stress, the material to be cracked undergoes a process of (1) crack initiation, (2) crack propagation, (3) the increase of crack width. Therefore, this fracture mechanism is distinguished from a breakage by blasting.

The mechanism by the expansive stress of Crackamite is shown in Fig. 1. Cracks initiate from an inner surface of the hole, being caused by tensile stress at a right angle with the compressive stress that occurs by the expansive stress of Crackamite. The expansive stress of Crackamite continues even after the appearance of cracks, the cracks propagate and also new cracks initiate during the process. Usually, for a single hole, 2 - 4 cracks initiate and propagate. When a free surface exists, the crack, as shown in Fig. 2, is pushed apart mainly by the shear stress, and a secondary crack also arises from the bottom of the hole running toward the free surface.

When multiple numbers of holes are filled with Crackamite, that are properly adjacent to each other, the cracks from the hole propagate to connect with the neighboring holes, as shown in Fig. 3. It is therefore possible to determine the directions of the cracks as planned by appropriately arranging the hole spacing and its depth and its inclination.
Click to expand...
(Illustrations refered to in quote located here: http://www.crackamite.com/working.html).

So, it doesn't explode, it expands. And it takes a long time (hours, according to the link). Not to mention the fact that it's a material that works based on the premise that the material will react like rock (concrete, marble, etc.) and not like metal (steel would deform to absorb expansion of such a material).

I can go on, but the bottom line is that this material does not fit the observations made at the World Trade Center.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Let's also consider its mechanism:


(Illustrations refered to in quote located here: http://www.crackamite.com/working.html).

So, it doesn't explode, it expands. And it takes a long time (hours, according to the link). Not to mention the fact that it's a material that works based on the premise that the material will react like rock (concrete, marble, etc.) and not like metal (steel would deform to absorb expansion of such a material).

I can go on, but the bottom line is that this material does not fit the observations made at the World Trade Center.
Click to expand...

Relatively rapid "Freeze-thaw" program, without the "Thaw" part being necessary, since you drill the hole to start with...
 
Crackamite was an unsuccessful attempt by the NWO to market mind control drugs to Australians in the guise of Vegemite infused Cheese Crackers. Unfortunately the NWO chose to use a cheaper generic brand of vegemite instead of the real macoy and Crackamites were, rightfully, shunned by the Australian public.
 
Based on the usage recommendations for "plain concrete" at the Crackamite site, it appears that all that would be required would be about 600 metric tons of Crackamite, and a few 1-1/2" diameter holes.

By "a few," I mean about 8 million (conservative estimate). For one tower.

So, if a workman can drill a hole in one minute and fill it with Crackamite in another minute, then a crew of 100 can destroy the floor slabs of one tower in just under a year of 8-hour night shifts. And hope nobody notices the floors being lumpy all year, since there's no way to delay "setting it off."

And the effect of all that on the structural integrity of the towers would be minimal. In fact, if all the concrete flooring had been removed (not just broken up) before the attacks, the towers might not have collapsed at all (especially since all the tenants would have moved out due to the massive amounts of concrete dust from the drilling, taking all their heavy and combustible stuff with them).

Respectfully,
Myriad

ETA: Oh dear, it appears that TruthByDecree is no longer with us. You could'a socked -- I mean knocked -- me over with a feather. I'm socked -- I mean shocked -- that such violations of the Member Agreement have taken place under our unsuspecting noses.
 
Last edited:
gtc said:
Crackamite was an unsuccessful attempt by the NWO to market mind control drugs to Australians in the guise of Vegemite infused Cheese Crackers. Unfortunately the NWO chose to use a cheaper generic brand of vegemite instead of the real macoy and Crackamites were, rightfully, shunned by the Australian public.
Click to expand...

Actually, I'd heard that it was developed by Thyssen money in the early '40s by Prescott Bush and Manuel Noriega's great uncle, Umbilico Noriega. The idea was that after the war Germany and the US were going to need an alternative to the pervasive Commonwealth facination with (nay, addiction to) disgusting foodstuffs ending in m-i-t-e, and Crackamite was thought to be the answer.

There had been earlier efforts to develop, with T-Thant (U-Thant's father... coincidence, you say? I think not), Smackamite, but the formula proved unstable... the testers kept nodding off.

Now, we know the answer to the oft-asked question in Sunday School.... Why does God give us peanut butter?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom