Sept. 9, 1994: Practice for 9/11???

[aggle-rithm]

This past weekend I saw an episode of "Air Emergency" that spoke of the crash of a USAir jet in Pittsburgh on September 9, 1994. When coming in for a landing, the plane suddenly went out of control and nosed into the ground at high speed.

The crash scene investigator interviewed for the show let slip an astonishing revelation:

"When I got there, the first thing I noticed was that there was no airplane."

Truthers, what do you make of this? As you know, lack of recognizable airplane parts is considered PROOF that flight 93, which crashed in Shanksville on September 11, 2001, was shot down, or never existed, or landed safely in Cleveland, or...well, I'm not sure what, but it IS highly suspicious.

Does this mean that the USAir crash didn't really happen either? Was it a DRESS REHEARSAL for the most fiendish plot in American history: To pretend that a plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania for some reason?

Consider:

1. Both crashes were in Pennsylvania (IT'S TRUE!!! LOOK AT A MAP!!!)

2. Both crashes occurred early in September (ITS TRUE!!! CHECK A CALENDAR!!!)

3. NEITHER crash was blamed on the government. COULD THIS BE A COINCIDENCE???

Just to show you how evil the government is, TWO OTHER planes of identical design lost control in the span of several years before and after this so-called "accident", which never really happened but which nevertheless was caused by the government.

The government was trying to throw us off the trail! They CLAIM that it was a design flaw in the rudder control, which would suddenly freeze up or reverse its function at extreme temperatures, but we know THAT isn't true. But the REAL reason they did it was to test the plausibility of their master plan:





OK, I have no idea what their master plan might be. But THAT is why we need a new investigation!!!

!!11Eleventy11!!!

 

[twinstead]

I'm constantly amazed at the evil, fiendishly clever nature of the NWO. They do have a GREAT 401k and a casual dress code, so I down with it anyway.

 

[scissorhands]

The wreckage was strewn over a large, remote area -- so remote, Mr. Boyle said, that a road would have to be cut through the woods to reach the debris.

So it was clearly shot down.

Richard Trenary, a retired truck driver who lives on a wooded hill above the crash site, said he and a neighbor, Gerald Taylor, were sitting in Mr. Taylor's yard when the plane went over, making "a popping sound, like a muffled backfire," rather than the familiar roar and whine of a jet, as if the pilot was "trying to restart his engine."

Hmmmmm.

Combined with the fact that the plane wasnt there, this popping sound and debris field probably means the plane landed elsewhere at an undefined military base and the passengers were executed.
A military drone shot down the decoy aircraft to confuse the sheeple in the area.

 

[David Swidler]

Yeah, but to join you had to get circumcised. But on balance, I agree.

 

[timhau]

Yeah, but to join you had to get circumcised.

Unless you're an undercover operative.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Combined with the fact that the plane wasnt there, this popping sound and debris field probably means the plane landed elsewhere at an undefined military base and the passengers were executed.
A military drone shot down the decoy aircraft to confuse the sheeple in the area.

So it wasn't there, it landed at a military base, and it was shot down?

......

My God...the conspiracy's bigger than we thought!!!

 

[Blender Head]

What flight was it?

 

[phunk]

The crash scene investigator interviewed for the show let slip an astonishing revelation:

"When I got there, the first thing I noticed was that there was no airplane."

Well, a scattered debris field is not an airplane anymore, is it?

 

[SpaceMonkeyZero]

So it was clearly shot down.



Hmmmmm.

Combined with the fact that the plane wasnt there, this popping sound and debris field probably means the plane landed elsewhere at an undefined military base and the passengers were executed.
A military drone shot down the decoy aircraft to confuse the sheeple in the area.

Well, that is the *easier* way to do things after all.

Well, not as easy as firing up the hurricane and earthquake generators...

 

[aggle-rithm]

Well, a scattered debris field is not an airplane anymore, is it?

Any truther will tell you that every plane crash in history has recognizable plane parts scattered around such that anyone with a ninth-grade education can easily investigate and tell why it crashed (it was the Jews).

The only ones that don't are those that were apparently faked by the government. You can always tell those because you don't see any recognizable parts, which is the hallmark of plane crashes faked by the government. You know they do it, because there are crash sites with no recognizable parts, and the government does those.

Another hallmark is crash sites in which recognizable pieces ARE found, because the government planted them. Sometimes the flight recorders they planted give us valuable information about how the plane did not actually crash.

 

[Caustic Logic]

I thought you had your dates mixed up since 2 1/2 days later (just past the 9/11 mark) Frank Eugene Corder crashed his Cessna into the White House, early on 9/12. No defensive fire, Clinton and his family were out of town at the time while the White House was being renovated. (with reinforced walls and blast-proof kevlar windows?). This is truly odd, but then again odd things do happen.

 

[ktesibios]

What flight was it?

It was USAir_Flight_427^WP

The plane was a Boeing 737, a type which has had a history of rudder control problems. Boeing_737_rudder_issues^WP.

 

[aggle-rithm]

It was USAir_Flight_427^WP

The plane was a Boeing 737, a type which has had a history of rudder control problems. Boeing_737_rudder_issues^WP.

The first time I saw that episode of Air Emergency, I was scheduled to take a flight on a 737 later that week. At the time, not all of the aircraft had had the defect corrected; it was going to take several years to get to them all.

 

[aggle-rithm]

It was USAir_Flight_427^WP

The plane was a Boeing 737, a type which has had a history of rudder control problems. Boeing_737_rudder_issues^WP.

Oh no.

I just realized: Take the flight number, add the second and third digits, subtract one from the first digit, transpose them, and you have...

FLIGHT 93!!!!

Coincidence?

 

[Tolls]

Any truther will tell you that every plane crash in history has recognizable plane parts scattered around such that anyone with a ninth-grade education can easily investigate and tell why it crashed (it was the Jews).

The only ones that don't are those that were apparently faked by the government. You can always tell those because you don't see any recognizable parts, which is the hallmark of plane crashes faked by the government. You know they do it, because there are crash sites with no recognizable parts, and the government does those.

Another hallmark is crash sites in which recognizable pieces ARE found, because the government planted them. Sometimes the flight recorders they planted give us valuable information about how the plane did not actually crash.

I think I broke my brain reading that!

 

[DC]

so no plane there?

http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/us427/2.shtml

The solid state flight data recorder (SSFDR), a Loral/Fairchild Data Systems
model F1000, part number S603-1000-00, and serial number 442, was removed from the
wreckage and sent to the Vehicle Performance Division’s laboratory at the National
Transportation Safety Board on September 8, 1994 for readout and evaluation.

and impact angle was around 80° speed was around 260 Knots.

...............

 

[DC]

i miss the cartoon like imprint

 

[DC]

but hey, the Serial number of the CVR is missing !!!

A Fairchild model A-1OOA cockpit voice recorder (CVR) was brought to
the audio laboratory of the National Transportation Safety Board on September
9, 1994. Its serial number and identification plate was missing.

but atleast they mention a reason why there is no serial number in the report.

 

[DC]

http://www.ntsb.gov/events/usair427/items.htm

here the link to the NTSB Reports

 

[aggle-rithm]

I think I broke my brain reading that!

I'm glad to hear that. I was afraid I had made it too comprehensible.