Originally Posted by
Rob
Hi Richard,
As you know by now, we are unable to find much opposition in terms of professional, civil discussion. We have tried Popular Mechanics and the NTSB. So
we have decided to scrape the bottom of the barrel and invite internet "debunkers" who spend their days and nights obsessed with our work(although now they are using the excuse they dont want to give us any "attention" when a debate challenge arises). I phoned "pomoroo" on the linked thread below and he started a thread looking for "opposition", but as you can see, not many are stepping up to the plate and after reading through the thread, you can see why it is "scraping the bottom of the barrel" as its
mostly ad homs and personal attacks.
If no one does step up to the plate, we can read through the thread on air to show the world how our "opposition" behaves, and we can address the few arguments that are pointed out in the thread. You can find it here...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=113627
Regards,
Rob
OK Rob
Reconcile the NOC witnesses and all the other witnesses to a physically possible flight path.
do it now. You have had almost seven years. don't forget to include witness Morin in your calculations. Remember that none of your witnesses describe a steep bank. Not a one.
Explain why Edward Paik standing in his parking lot. Out IN FRONT OF his shop. Waves his hand behind his back, directly down a path parallel to Columbia Pike. From his feet to his fingertips Rob. be honest. Where is he pointing? He is pointing directly to Morin's position at the security booth Bob.
Your Arlington cemetery witnesses Bob, Here is their locations. Explain why wheelhouse cant see through the trees. But your band member who even says her view is blocked by trees. Can see a plane on the "far side' of the Pentagon.
Explain why Edward Paik would even assume that the DOT tower was being repaired the next day because of starboard wing tip contact. When you claim by his testimony that the flight path was nowhere near the tower.
Explain the fast speed described by the witnesses.
Explain the complete absence of flyover witnesses on the east side of the Pentagon while hundreds testify they saw a plane on the impact or west side. At 9 am there are many people on the bridge over the Potomac that time of morning. Not a one saw a plane over the river? Not even from the Pentagon parking lot? or the marina on the river?
Craig is this Jamal, The "new 18th witness"? can you show us where this photo was taken?
was it taken here?
Then why is the CIT flight path behind the cameraman in the opposite direction Jamal, the 18th witness is pointing?
I expect these questions to be answered Rob and Craig. You have only a few days to come up with the answers. Good luck.
Rob. I have highlighted in
red some irony in your post. Pot meet Kettle.
I have many more questions I may post later.
