AZ's Truth Senator gets Opinion letter in AZ Paper - Open for comments

BigAl

Philosopher
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
5,397
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/0503johnson03.html

I see it's open for comments. Lets see what shows up.


We deserve the full truth about 9/11
Tale of Building 7's collapse suggests official complicity, persistent obstruction

May. 3, 2008 12:00 AM
Regarding "Drinking the 9/11 Kool-Aid" (Editorial, April 24):

After three government investigations and more than six years, we still don't have answers on 9/11.

Why, for example, did Building 7 collapse? It wasn't hit by a plane, as the towers were. The 9/11 Commission Report completely ignores Building 7. The Federal Emergency Management Agency report.... ]yadda yadda yadda absolutely nothing new here ]
 
Wow, that "Kool-Aid" comment was incredibly ironic considering the letter is just a bunch of debunked ideas transcribed verbatim from conspiracy theory websites.
 
I love that "it wasn't hit by a plane" argument. Apparently, the only way a building can collapse is if a passenger jet rams into it.

Idiots.
 
WTC-7? Well that's new and has certainly been overlooked by everyone who attempts to explain "the official story" so far. :rolleyes:
 
If the Arizona Senator wants "the truth" or another investigation, she should contact her Arizona congressmen and Senators and ask for one.
 
Wow, that "Kool-Aid" comment was incredibly ironic considering the letter is just a bunch of debunked ideas transcribed verbatim from conspiracy theory websites.

The "Kool-Aid" was from another, previous article, which this column takes issue with.
 
I can deal with some of the nonsense posted by truthers here at JREF but when I read them talk about 911 in different comment sections to various articles, I start wanting to kill for the greater good. :D

Time to remove this incompetent from office.
 
If the Arizona Senator wants "the truth" or another investigation, she should contact her Arizona congressmen and Senators and ask for one.

Exactly. Why is this U.S. Senator merely writing an editorial in her local newspaper? Why isn't she taking this earth-shattering evidence to the Senate floor? Or how about getting a petition together, Senator?

Say what you will about the divisiveness within the Truther ranks, one thing they all seem to have in common is their complete unwillingness to do anything constructive in the name of their cause.

And welcome to the forums, zorro99! :)
 
Exactly. Why is this U.S. Senator merely writing an editorial in her local newspaper? Why isn't she taking this earth-shattering evidence to the Senate floor? Or how about getting a petition together, Senator?

She's not a US Senator, she's a state senator. She's generally recognized out here as the politician both Republicans and Democrats find tedious. And yes, she supported Ron Paul in the primaries.
 
I love that "it wasn't hit by a plane" argument. Apparently, the only way a building can collapse is if a passenger jet rams into it.

Idiots.


Fire alone cannot collapse a steel skyscraper especially completely into its own footprint at free fall speed.

Where's the report from NIST proving that statement wrong? It's been 7 years.

IDIOT.
 
Fire alone cannot collapse a steel skyscraper especially completely into its own footprint at free fall speed.

Speculation on your part.



Where's the report from NIST proving that statement wrong? It's been 7 years.

IDIOT.

So you are ignoring the structural damage to the building?
 
and the truthers come out in droves in the comments of that article. the last page has "Popular mechanics was debunke by David R. Griffon" (not my spelling)
 
I think this is all a sham, and that she is really just trying to get a crack at the VP slot for the Ron Paul 2008 Ticket.

Trouble is, she has to get through Alex Jones, the current leading candidate.

TAM;)
 

Back
Top Bottom