but then, why does that ID story more scientific than other ID stories? [/quoite]
What?
That's just not true. I'm always willing to survey the evidence and give it complete consideration. The only thing I ask is to be willing to accept the same level of analysis I give all data.
I don't trust your analysis.
Fair, but making man out of dirt and making women out of a rib doesn't really describe the mechanism and contradicts the scientifically proven evidence that humans share common ancestry with chimpanzees. In this regard, it can be said that the bible account is conclusively wrong.
The Bible doesn't use the word "dirt". YOU DO! It is common knowledge that all the elements essential for constructing the human body can be found in soil. So your surprize that the creator should extract his material from the soil is a bit weird. As is your astonishment that the creator could take genetic material from one human's body in order to create another.
Cloning is done by humans today and they aren't almighty.
So if ID is true, it isn't likely that it is the christian god who did it.
That's your unsolicited opinion as opposed to millions who disagree with you, an opinion which is very common among atheists and an opinion which should be irrelevant to the discussion and one which I am really not interested in. However, you should know that if biblically-garbled statements are made I will be forced to contiunue to set the matter straight. So if you really don't wish to talk about the biblical God, or anything else biblical-then I suggest that you try to refrain from the constant biblical misrepresentations which keep cropping up in your arguments.
