'Molten' metal found at WTC 1, 2, and 7, 8 weeks after 9-11?

[Evilgiraffe]

Sorry DGM.... I left out the "alleged" before said Thermite Cutting Charge^TM.

Lazy writing. Bad Giraffe. Will do better.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

I supposed imagining that 80 elevator technicians who worked at the WTC around the clock not seeing anything suspicious is not speculative?

 

[DC]

I supposed imagining that 80 elevator technicians who worked at the WTC around the clock not seeing anything suspicious is not speculative?

what would they see?

 

[DGM]

Sorry DGM.... I left out the "alleged" before said Thermite Cutting Charge^TM.

Lazy writing. Bad Giraffe. Will do better.

No problem.............

I've seen that phase used too many times to ignore. I even had a supposed demolition guy (Named Dave) cop out on backing that one up. Actually he ran when I cornered him on it (I hate frauds).

 

[defaultdotxbe]

what would they see?

anything out of the ordinary attached to the structural members of the towers

 

[Evilgiraffe]

what would they see?

I Dunno, why don't you come up with a plausible sequence of events in which the towers are brought down by thermite?

Then we can discuss what the occupants of the building may, or may not, have seen and wheteher they might have considered it suspicious.

 

[DC]

What the hell is a "thermite cutting charge"?
I've never seen one of those and I know for a fact that they don't exist in the demolition business.

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M

im totally convinced that this device was not used in the WTC demolition.
but they call it linear thermite cutting charge

 

[DC]

I Dunno, why don't you come up with a plausible sequence of events in which the towers are brought down by thermite?

Then we can discuss what the occupants of the building may, or may not, have seen and wheteher they might have considered it suspicious.

if working thermite devices exist, it should be enough to install those charges on one or two floors. atleast 3.7m i got told.

 

[applecorped]

if working thermite devices exist, it should be enough to install those charges on one or two floors. atleast 3.7m i got told.

Source?

 

[Evilgiraffe]

And, pray tell, how would these devices be installed without the occupants of the building noticing?

You do realise that the support columns would not be easily accessible, don't you?

 

[DC]

Source?

those 3.7m?

http://www.nistreview.org/WTC-PROGRESSIVE-COLLAPSE-BAZANT.pdf

 

[defaultdotxbe]

those 3.7m?

http://www.nistreview.org/WTC-PROGRESSIVE-COLLAPSE-BAZANT.pdf

so then we need a way fro those not to be found by the workers, and for them to survive being hit by airliners

but then you get into wondering why, with such a small number of devices, were they even necessary, surely the planes would provide enough damage

and how much molten steel would such a msall number of small devices produce? the video you linked you showed pretty much no slag or molten material at all, so your "evidence" doesnt even fit

 

[DC]

so then we need a way fro those not to be found by the workers, and for them to survive being hit by airliners

but then you get into wondering why, with such a small number of devices, were they even necessary, surely the planes would provide enough damage

and how much molten steel would such a msall number of small devices produce? the video you linked you showed pretty much no slag or molten material at all, so your "evidence" doesnt even fit

LOL

i clearly stated what i think about that device and i never called it evidence.

dont put words in my mouth, thx

 

[Jonnyclueless]

what would they see?

Uh what do you think is involved in cutting into core columns and placing charges? many 1000s of lbs of it.

Were these magical explosives?

 

[DC]

Uh what do you think is involved in cutting into core columns and placing charges? many 1000s of lbs of it.

Were these magical explosives?

how much do you think it would need????
so you also dont belive the Progressive collapse theory?

 

[Jonnyclueless]

how much do you think it would need????
so you also dont belive the Progressive collapse theory?

Are you joking? Let's give an example of the CD of a 30 story building (not 110 stories):

In 24 days, CDI's 12 person loading crew placed 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on 9 levels of the structure. Over 36,000 ft. of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay devices were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system. As the implosion required the detonation of a total of 2,728 lb. of explosives, CDI implemented 36 "primary delays" and an additional 216 “micro-delays" in the implosion initiation sequence in an attempt to keep detonation overpressure to a minimum.

And why would you think I don't believe in the proven progressive collapse?

 

[DGM]

Are you joking? Let's give an example of the CD of a 30 story building (not 110 stories):

In 24 days, CDI's 12 person loading crew placed 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on 9 levels of the structure. Over 36,000 ft. of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay devices were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system. As the implosion required the detonation of a total of 2,728 lb. of explosives, CDI implemented 36 "primary delays" and an additional 216 “micro-delays" in the implosion initiation sequence in an attempt to keep detonation overpressure to a minimum.

And why would you think I don't believe in the proven progressive collapse?

And just to add; I've been on these sites after one of these demolitions and all of this stuff leaves remnants. Thermite also leaves tell tail evidence on the steel that (dare I say) even a "truther" could spot.

This whole line of argument raises the "truth" movement to a new high in idiocy. (if that's even fathomable)

 

[DC]

Are you joking? Let's give an example of the CD of a 30 story building (not 110 stories):

In 24 days, CDI's 12 person loading crew placed 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on 9 levels of the structure. Over 36,000 ft. of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay devices were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system. As the implosion required the detonation of a total of 2,728 lb. of explosives, CDI implemented 36 "primary delays" and an additional 216 “micro-delays" in the implosion initiation sequence in an attempt to keep detonation overpressure to a minimum.

And why would you think I don't believe in the proven progressive collapse?

bah all that work all that explosives.
seems like a 30 story building is not enough to let it progressively collapse after destroying 3.7m

 

[Jonnyclueless]

I assume he was trying to make a point, but i'll be darned if I can figure it out. Can anyone translate?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

bah all that work all that explosives.
seems like a 30 story building is not enough to let it progressively collapse after destroying 3.7m

well that would remove the "controlled" aspect of the demolition