• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Where did the right wing hit the Pentagon? Or is Gravy wrong?

A hijacked American Airlines 757 hit the pentagon. Eyewitnesses, passenger phone calls,
forensic evidence at the scene (which was seen by CIVILLIAN air crash investigators & CIVILLIAN FIREFIGHTERS).

Conspiracy theorists cannot accept that, yet they cannot provide hard evidence to the contrary either.

Nor can they understand that a 'debunker' can be critical of the US government's 'war on terror'.
 
Hey Tanabear, do us a favor, don't open up your questions with a pack of bs.

"I have been attempting in this forum to see if the debunkers can give straight, simple and consistent answers to questions regarding various aspects of the 9/11 attacks. So far their efforts have not been fruitful. The answers range all over the place and are mutually contradictory. This does not seem to bother them, as it is more important to question the motivation of the Truthers, than it is answer questions."

Hey Champ, we've seen your Blog, you are a dyed in the wool troofer, there is no possible way you are going to listen to the answers you have been given, and you nit pick meaningless differences. For cripes sake, your OP asks about perhaps a foot or two difference in a demonstrative photograph. "he should show the rectangle at a slight upwards tilt." Are you kidding? Who could possibly care? A slight upward tilt, is this what passes for an investigation in Twoofer land?

Are you going to run back to your blog and claim that you got someone at JREF to admit that one demonstrative photograph should have a red box in it at a slight upward tilt?

Utterly pathetic. "slight upward tilt."

"SLIGHT. UPWARD. TILT."

Can someone please shop that photograph to show a "slight Upward Tilt?"

Slight upward tilt. "So for Mark Roberts to be accurate, he should show the rectangle at a slight upwards tilt." Maybe if you slightly turned your head sideways, you can answer your own question? SLIGHT UPWARD TILT.
 
Last edited:
Terral said:
Hi Tanabear:




Mark Roberts (My Thread) is an Official Cover Story cronie telling nothing but Loyal Bushie LIES. Nothing similar to a real 100-Ton Jetliner ever struck the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day (my Pentagon threads are here and here). Official DoD/FBI Cover Story Operatives ramble on aimlessly about ‘holes,’ because they have no real evidence that any real 100-Ton Jetliner ever crashed into the Pentagon, according to these expert witnesses and 110 Military Expert Witnesses. The biggest contradiction in the Official Cover Story is that AA77 (never even took off on 9/11) crashed into the Pentagon at 9:38 AM (ACAAR = Page 200 PDF and 911Commission Report = Page 50 PDF), when the 911Truth is that the aircraft really struck the Pentagon at 9:32 AM (see the FAA Official Timeline and Barbara Honegger’s work). No ‘time-change’ parts have ever been produced from any of the four Jetliners (Flights 11, 77, 93 or 175) that ‘supposedly’ crashed on 9/11, according to the military maintenance experts like Colonel George Nelson USAF.

Try to get just one of these JREF ‘debunkers’ (heh) to produce just one picture of AA77 or AA93 crashed ANYWHERE. Good luck, because the holes in their heads are bigger than the one in the Wedge One E-Ring outer wall. :0)

GL,

Terral
Click to expand...


What happened when you contacted the Dover Port Mortuary where the remains of Flight 77's passengers and crew were identified?

Right, you didn't attempt to contact the mortuary. You never will.
We have established that the FBI is part of your imaginary conspiracy. When will you bring your "evidence" to a real news outlet?

Oh, of course: You have no intention of ever contacting a real news outlet.

Take consolation from the fact that you are quite possibly not the silliest fraud in the fantasy movement.
 
16.5 said:
...

Utterly pathetic. "slight upward tilt."

"SLIGHT. UPWARD. TILT."

Can someone please shop that photograph to show a "slight Upward Tilt?"

Slight upward tilt. "So for Mark Roberts to be accurate, he should show the rectangle at a slight upwards tilt." Maybe if you slightly turned your head sideways, you can answer your own question? SLIGHT UPWARD TILT.
Click to expand...

my thoughts exactly. It all proves...Gravy's a very bad man.
 
peteweaver said:
A hijacked American Airlines 757 hit the pentagon. Eyewitnesses, passenger phone calls,
forensic evidence at the scene (which was seen by CIVILLIAN air crash investigators & CIVILLIAN FIREFIGHTERS).

Conspiracy theorists cannot accept that, yet they cannot provide hard evidence to the contrary either.

Nor can they understand that a 'debunker' can be critical of the US government's 'war on terror'.
Click to expand...

Did that Ted Olsen-Barbara Olsen call ever take place?
 
Mostly, it was the center inside the Pentagon.

The right wing was in the White House.

The left wing was out protesting on various college campuses.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Terral said:
Cover Story Operatives ramble on aimlessly about ‘holes,’ because they have no real evidence that any real 100-Ton Jetliner ever crashed into the Pentagon...
Click to expand...
And yet you've claimed a 36-ton A-3 did. Or do you think we've forgotten you've made such a claim?
 
As far as Truther "humor" goes that's not that bad.
Click to expand...
I found Myriad's comment much funnier. Now I've got an image of a 757 wing holding a placard and shouting "No Planes!"

Are the people posting on JREF the same people who conducted the investigations? Are we the FBI, The NTSB, NIST, The Virginia Police?
Click to expand...
I'm CSIS, but we only work for the NWO on a contract basis.
 
Ateius said:
...
I'm CSIS, but we only work for the NWO on a contract basis.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure if you are joking or not, but in the case that you aren't joking(the CSIS part), could you perhaps point out to our CT friends just how difficult it would be to fake all the evidence of Flt 77 hitting the Pentagon?

There have been CTs who say that all of the DNA evidence was faked (anyone who says Flt 77 didn't crash there is saying that I guess). The plane parts, the damage to objects in front of the Pentagon etc etc all have to be faked for their fantasy to work. I have no idea how someone can truly believe this stuff, but apparently they do.

If you can manage to get any of them to understand how things work in the real world you deserve a medal.
 
Brainache said:
There have been CTs who say that all of the DNA evidence was faked (anyone who says Flt 77 didn't crash there is saying that I guess). The plane parts, the damage to objects in front of the Pentagon etc etc all have to be faked for their fantasy to work. I have no idea how someone can truly believe this stuff, but apparently they do.
Click to expand...
I've noticed that lately they just ignore all that stuff. TC329 refuses to even address it, and RedIbis hasn't posted here since I pressed him on it after he tried to ignore it for several weeks.

Full of integrity, those truthers are...
 
Terral said:
Hi Tanabear:




Mark Roberts (My Thread) is an Official Cover Story cronie telling nothing but Loyal Bushie LIES. Nothing similar to a real 100-Ton Jetliner ever struck the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day (my Pentagon threads are here and here). Official DoD/FBI Cover Story Operatives ramble on aimlessly about ‘holes,’ because they have no real evidence that any real 100-Ton Jetliner ever crashed into the Pentagon, according to these expert witnesses and 110 Military Expert Witnesses. The biggest contradiction in the Official Cover Story is that AA77 (never even took off on 9/11) crashed into the Pentagon at 9:38 AM (ACAAR = Page 200 PDF and 911Commission Report = Page 50 PDF), when the 911Truth is that the aircraft really struck the Pentagon at 9:32 AM (see the FAA Official Timeline and Barbara Honegger’s work). No ‘time-change’ parts have ever been produced from any of the four Jetliners (Flights 11, 77, 93 or 175) that ‘supposedly’ crashed on 9/11, according to the military maintenance experts like Colonel George Nelson USAF.

Try to get just one of these JREF ‘debunkers’ (heh) to produce just one picture of AA77 or AA93 crashed ANYWHERE. Good luck, because the holes in their heads are bigger than the one in the Wedge One E-Ring outer wall. :0)

GL,

Terral
Click to expand...

Well if you don't count the witnesses that saw a plane hitting the pentagon, who are over 120, against the ammount of people that said that a missile hit it, which is 0, and if you don't count the debris, the landing gear, the piece of engine, and big pieces of fuselage coming from the 757...

Oh, and tell the families of those who died on Flight 77 that no plane hit the pentagon. Or the families of those who died at the pentagon when the plane crashed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom