That's not a gag order. That document basically says that although she no longer works for the FBI she still has to abide by the oath she signed when she did work there. Forum member Sabrina I'm sure could expand on this seeing how she works (or did) in the intelligence sector.
If she had knowledge of illegal activities Ashcroft's order would be illegal, and Edmonds could say all she wanted with impunity.
Edmonds knows nothing about 9/11 being an inside job. And she sure does talk a lot for someone with a gag order!
until we have direct evidence of saudi involvemant, they are not involved.
Sure why not. But there is direct evidence that Al Qaeda was involved and he is the head of that organization.so we can say the same about Osama bin laden?
osama bin laden took credit for 9-11, again and again. there is direct evidence linking the hijackers to osama and his al qaeda "cavemen".
“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”
until we have direct evidence of saudi involvemant, they are not involved.
Sen. Graham:
In general terms it included the details of why we [on the committee] had raised suspicion that the Saudi government and various representatives of Saudi interests had supported some of the hijackers -- and might have supported all of them.
According to Shenon, several staff members working under Snell, “felt strongly that they had demonstrated a close Saudi government connection,” based on “explosive material” on al-Bayoumi and Fahad al-Thumairy, a “shadowy Saudi diplomat in Los Angeles.”
Shenon recounts how Snell, in preparing his team’s account of the plot, purged almost all of the most serious allegations against the Saudi government and moved the “explosive” supporting evidence to the small print of the report’s footnotes. (The Commission, pp. 398-399)
Two commission investigators who were working on documenting the 9/11 plot, Michael Jacobsen and Raj De, argued that it was “crazy” to insist on 100 percent proof when it came to al-Qaeda or the Saudi regime. In the end, however, and with a publishing deadline looming, Snell’s caution and Zelikow’s direction buried apparently promising leads.
In similar fashion, 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry Report produced by Congress -- an entire chapter outlining evidence of Saudi and other state sponsorship -- were redacted.
Link
Have you ever heard of this name, 'Moussaoui'? He was put on trial you know, you may have heard of it.and what is the evidence linking AQ to it?
Have you ever heard of this name, 'Moussaoui'? He was put on trial you know, you may have heard of it.
the "conspiracy-deniers" mantra is that the "truth-movement" is lying.
why do Loose Toothers always insist on debating established fact?
Al Qaeda did 9-11, Bin Laden leads Al Qaeda. Case closed.
Lots of it right here > Moussaoui Trial Exhibits