Scholars for RMS Titanic Truth

Clearly it was da jooos who caused the sinking of the Titanic. Just look at it, Iceberg. Common Jooish last names end in -berg, therefore, it was a plot by da Joos. Just watch it on YouTube!
 
OK all you shills, answer these questions:

Why was there a stand-down by the California?
Why did some passengers claim to hear an explosion?
Why did White Star Line increase its insurance of the "unsinkable" Titanic from $7 million to $12.5 million a week before the ship sailed?
Why did J. P. Morgan cancel his berth along with fifty other first-class passengers?
Why was the sister ship, the Olympic, cut up and sold for scrap and no steel samples saved?
How is it possible that another ship, the Niagra, struck an iceberg and sustained damage on the same day, and did not sink?
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Hate to inject a measure of real science into what is obviously a parody thread, but: Did anyone know that some researchers are saying that the steel used in Titanic's construction was faulty?

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE1DD143DF935A2575AC0A965958260



I found that interesting. I sort of remembered that from a History Channel (or was it Discovery?) documentary on that exact topic.

ETA: Note that the link I provided is from 1993. There may be more research on this topic since then. I just haven't bothered to look it up at the moment (waiting for a cab to take me to the mechanics to pick up my car).
Click to expand...

Damn you, Hummus!! This is a conspiracy! We don't have time for your facts!
 
Apollo20 said:
OK all you shills, answer these questions:

Why was there a stand-down by the California?
Why did some passengers claim to hear an explosion?
Why did White Star Line increase its insurance of the "unsinkable" Titanic from $7 million to $12.5 million a week before the ship sailed?
Why did J. P. Morgan cancel his berth along with fifty other first-class passengers?
Why was the sister ship, the Olympic, cut up and sold for scrap and no steel samples saved?
How is it possible that another ship, the Niagra, struck an iceberg and sustained damage on the same day, and did not sink?
Click to expand...

LMAO... that is awesome! :D

Ps. Is J. P. Morgan Jewish? Maybe that explains things (Bum Bum BUHHHHM!!!!). :eek:
 
There were 25 Jewish passengers in First-Class on the Titanic. Twelve perished and thirteen were saved. What does that tell you!?!
 
Apollo20 said:
There were 25 Jewish passengers in First-Class on the Titanic. Twelve perished and thirteen were saved. What does that tell you!?!
Click to expand...

Are you suuuuuure the twelve perished? That they weren't spirited away on a copycat version of the Titanic to Area 37 (one of the predecessors of Area 51)?
 
AZCat:

Sorry, their bodies were recovered!

Oh and by the way, John Jacob Astor's body was covered in soot!

(But that's another story)
 
Apollo20 said:
There were 25 Jewish passengers in First-Class on the Titanic. Twelve perished and thirteen were saved. What does that tell you!?!
Click to expand...

That 12 Jews faked their own deaths, obviously.

Also keep in mind that the Titanic's lifeboats had enough room for some 1,200 people, yet were loaded to well under capacity. In the end only 700+ people were saved.

So why did the crew arrange for an extra 500 people to die? Did those 500 people know the truth???
 
Apollo20 said:
AZCat:

Sorry, their bodies were recovered!

Oh and by the way, John Jacob Astor's body was covered in soot!

(But that's another story)
Click to expand...

All the first-class Jewish passengers were recovered, dead or not, while hundreds of other bodies sank? That's a sure sign of a conspiracy!


Sometimes with lizards it's hard to tell if they're really dead. Did anybody perform autopsies on these "alleged" corpses?
 
Last edited:
The Titanic had a built in hole when it was launched. The iceberg was merely a smokescreen. That is, if there really was an iceberg.

Or a Titanic.
 
What I find most disturbing about the Titanic cover-up was the 1997 hit-piece called "Titanic."

In it, "Jack Dawson" and "Rose Bukater" (neither of whom are on the passenger list!) fall in love aboard the ship. Jack takes Rose from a first class dining room to a third class party (which wasn't allowed), holds her hand at the very bow of the Titanic (an area off limits to passengers), draws a naked picture of her (no proof of this) and then bangs her in the back seat of a car in the storage hold (again, no proof).

Then when the ship starts to sink, Rose jumps out of a lifeboat and runs through the halls with Jack being shot at by Rose's fiancé.

There is no proof that any of this happened!

Now ask yourself: why is the official story making stuff up and covering up the controlled demolition of the RMS Titanic?

Answer: Joos!
 
Well actually it was the Olympic that sank!

Don't you guys know about the old switcheroo trick pulled by Lord Pierrie and J. Bruce Ismay in the Belfast shipyards!
 
Apollo20 said:
Well actually it was the Olympic that sank!

Don't you guys know about the old switcheroo trick pulled by Lord Pierrie and J. Bruce Ismay in the Belfast shipyards!
Click to expand...


That's discussed on the page I linked up-thread. This conspiracy theory took a major beating when a photograph of one of the propellers taken by a submersible revealed Titanic's hull number on one of the blades. :rolleyes:
 
Apollo20 said:
Well actually it was the Olympic that sank!

Don't you guys know about the old switcheroo trick pulled by Lord Pierrie and J. Bruce Ismay in the Belfast shipyards!
Click to expand...

Right you are, Apollo!

The Titanic truth movement picked up on this early on and staged a protest rally in front of White Star's office in London back on November 20, 1916, calling for a new investigation and demanding to see the real Titanic - which at that time was off the coast of Greece having been re-named "Britannic."

White Star knew the game was up, and so the very next day they pulled off yet another demolition and sank the "Britannic" as well - this time blaming the demolition on a "mine" (yeah, right!).

About 30 people on board the ship knew the truth and threatened to tell the world...so they were all placed in two lifeboats and were dropped violently into the water before being sucked into the ship's propellers and torn to pieces.

Everyone else, it appears, was paid off.
 
But here's the REAL clincher:

In the "History of the Twentieth Century with the Boring Parts Left Out" by David Wallechinsky we read on page 83 that the Titanic sank when it was 1191 miles from NEW YORK CITY. This is a clear prediction of 9/11! The British-style for the date 11th September, 2001 is 11-9-01, which reads, (if you drop the non-number zero), 1191...

Need I say more!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom