Larry Silverstein Takes Questions....

~enigma~ said:
Considering you are trying to argue semantics, it is apparent you are unarmed. Why didn't you answer my question? Are you accusing Silverstein of lying instead of the possibility of you being wrong because he is a joo?

ETA - The obvious avoidance of an answer last time I asked would prove to AJ and We Are Change that you are guilty :)
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question though. 7 onsite at WTC7 or WTC complex? Simple question really.

Are you accusing Silverstein of lying instead of the possibility of you being wrong because he is a joo?
Click to expand...

Again, Silversteins religion and ethnic background have no relevance to my position.

Now please answer my question.
 
Pardalis said:
The people making the complain in your link, which include Silverstein, are complaining that the insurance companies are profiting from the delays of the work at Ground Zero.

What does that have to do with this thread?
Click to expand...

Someone here claimed if there was any question about WTC-7 the insurance companies would have been all over it. The link I posted showed how the insurance companies were already being threatened with fines for delays. Why would they risk being fined never mind the threat of a public relations nightmare in respect to holding up the WTC memorial also being aimed their way?

There is also the civil case of the 1993 bombing at the WTC where the port authority of NY/NJ was found 68% liable to the terrorist 32% because of security breaches. The planes make it no fault. It that respect it was the best way to go for NY and the WTC. Remember we weren't going to let the terrorist win. Getting the NYC economy back on track was promoted as an important focus. It wouldn't have been seen as patriotic to get in the way of that.
 
Sizzler said:
Good question. These are my reasons.

1. Nigro denies the conversation took place and did not suggest any other commander at the time had such conversation.
Click to expand...

Because apparently, all the commanders that day were telepathic and Nigro could magically discern whether or not any of them talked with Silverstein

Sizzler said:
2. On 9-11 in all the panic and chaos, I think calling Larry would have served no cause. It doesn't make sense that anyone would feel the need to call him. At least to me that is.
Click to expand...

And everyone acts perfectly logical in cases where a whole mess of people are dying or dead.

Sizzler said:
3. Larry refused to answer who he actually spoke to when told that Nigro denies any such conversation.
Click to expand...

And Larry cannot forget anything and if he did, he'd have the guts to admit that he forgot something.
 
Last edited:
LastChild said:
Someone here claimed if there was any question about WTC-7 the insurance companies would have been all over it. The link I posted showed how the insurance companies were already being threatened with fines for delays.
Click to expand...

Again, relevance?

There is also the civil case of the 1993 bombing at the WTC where the port authority of NY/NJ was found 68% liable to the terrorist 32% because of security breaches. The planes make it no fault. It that respect it was the best way to go for NY and the WTC. Remember we weren't going to let the terrorist win. Getting the NYC economy back on track was promoted as an important focus. It wouldn't have been seen as patriotic to get in the way of that.
Click to expand...

Again, relevance?
 
THANK YOU BOFORS

Can you explain this "debunker" logic in the context of the current thread?:

167774, Silverstein was talking to Nigro.
Posted by boloboffin on Thu Aug-02-07 02:56 PM

If you have a better candidate, produce them. Otherwise, Silverstein was talking to Nigro.

Nigro made the decision to pull - he gave the order to pull people away from the collapse zone.

http://www.democraticunderground.com...opic_id=167440
Click to expand...

This is where the assumption came from.
 
bofors said:
Can you explain this "debunker" logic in the context of the current thread?:

167774, Silverstein was talking to Nigro.
Posted by boloboffin on Thu Aug-02-07 02:56 PM

If you have a better candidate, produce them. Otherwise, Silverstein was talking to Nigro.

Nigro made the decision to pull - he gave the order to pull people away from the collapse zone.

http://www.democraticunderground.co...az=printer_friendly&forum=125&topic_id=167440
Click to expand...


The BBC has learned that the fire department representative who spoke with Silverstein was not Nigro.
 
Do you guys and gals agree with Silverstein that the North Tower antenna caused a massive gash in the bldg and that the fires that burned all day were fed by diesel fuel?

Or is Silverstein lying through his dentures?
 
Pardalis said:
So how do you feel about accusing someone without proof on an internet forum?
Click to expand...

Since to most, if not all truthers think that this is simply an intellectual exorcise instead of a serious accusation of innocent people of the most heinous crime one can imagine, I would think he doesn't feel anything at all about it.
 
RedIbis said:
Do you guys and gals agree with Silverstein that the North Tower antenna caused a massive gash in the bldg and that the fires that burned all day were fed by diesel fuel?

Or is Silverstein lying through his dentures?
Click to expand...


Why must he be lying? Is he the first human in history who always knows the truth? Why can't he ever express a mistaken opinion?
 
Pardalis said:
So Boloboffin was mistaken.

Silverstein did not lie.
Click to expand...

It is certainly possible that someoe else called Larry, yet I don't believe it to be likely.

I'll have to reserve judgement for the time being seeing as my claim is based on a false assumption.
 
RedIbis said:
Do you guys and gals agree with Silverstein that the North Tower antenna caused a massive gash in the bldg and that the fires that burned all day were fed by diesel fuel?

Or is Silverstein lying through his dentures?
Click to expand...

False dilemma. I think he just doesn't know what the hell he is talking about.
 
RedIbis said:
Do you guys and gals agree with Silverstein that the North Tower antenna caused a massive gash in the bldg and that the fires that burned all day were fed by diesel fuel?

Or is Silverstein lying through his dentures?
Click to expand...

He may also be mistaken.

Why don't you wait to read the final report on WTC7 before accusing anyone of lying.
 
bofors said:
Can you explain this "debunker" logic in the context of the current thread?:

167774, Silverstein was talking to Nigro.
Posted by boloboffin on Thu Aug-02-07 02:56 PM

If you have a better candidate, produce them. Otherwise, Silverstein was talking to Nigro.

Nigro made the decision to pull - he gave the order to pull people away from the collapse zone.

http://www.democraticunderground.co...az=printer_friendly&forum=125&topic_id=167440
Click to expand...
Mistaken. People are funny like that. Good honest people will admit when they're wrong. PM him for clarification.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom