• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth Watch

286 professional architects and engineers don't believe the official story and are demanding that the 9/11 investigation be re-opened, and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7.

And when can we expect some of these people to produce some kind of research and publish it somewhere other than a kook website?
 
And when can we expect some of these people to produce some kind of research and publish it somewhere other than a kook website?
They have done the research and your calling it a 'kook' website is just pure denial.

I have listed many other qualified people who have gone on record saying the official story is a crock or WTC 7 was a CD, but you [all] just ignore them or write them off as 'kooks' and change the subject.

Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider Professors emeritus for structural analysis and construction at ETH.

Anders B[FONT=&quot]örkman, [/FONT][SIZE=-1]M.Sc. Naval Architect and Marine Engineer

Jeff King, MIT engineer
[/SIZE]
[FONT=&quot]Torin Wolf demolitions expert

Danny Jowenko

[/FONT]
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)

Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)

Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.)

Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member, Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers

Michael T. Donly, P.E., structural engineer

William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College

Patriots question WTC7
[FONT=&quot]http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret)[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Col. James R. Uhl, MD, MC, U.S. Army (ret)
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford, U.S. Marine Corps (ret)
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Lt. Col. Paul F. Getty, DDS (ret)
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army[/FONT][FONT=&quot]David L. Griscom, PhD
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Lon J. Waters, PhD Mathematics
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Robert David Steele
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Enver Masud, BS EE, MS OR [/FONT][FONT=&quot](Operations Research), PE
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Joel S. Hirschhorn, BS Metallurgical Engineering, MS Metallurgical Engineering, PhD Materials Engineering [/FONT]

Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 - "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/gen...or_republi.htm

Paul Craig Roberts, PhD, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan

Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George H.W. Bush

Morgan Reynolds, PhD, former Chief Economist of the U.S. Department of Labor under current President George W. Bush

Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald ReaganMary Schiavo, JD, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Transportation under Presidents George H.W. Bush and William Clinton

Mary Schiavo. Appointed under the administration of President George H. W. Bush, Ms. Schiavo served as the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Transportation from 1990 - 1996.

Barbara Honegger, served as Special Assistant to the Chief Domestic Policy Adviser to President Ronald Reagan and as a White House Policy Analyst.

Edward Peck, Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the U.S. State Department. Former U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq

Morton Goulder, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning under Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.

Tuesday February 12, 2008
Richard F. Humenn PE,"Fuel and Planes Alone Did NOT Bring the Towers Down"


The list is long and growing.

Despite claims like:
Architect
The fact is - and you can like it or lump it - that the NIST findings are almost universally supported across the very construction industry professionals who are qualified to understand them.

No one has posted the name of a qualified person who has studied the evidence and the NIST report, and stated publicly that they support the NIST conclusion.
 
Last edited:
What are the names?

are you the owner of the website? Why should I tell you those names? If the owners of the website were doing their jobs, they would have removed the names when they were told, and bothered to verify those names.
 
They have done the research and your calling it a 'kook' website is just pure denial.

I have listed many other qualified people who have gone on record saying the official story is a crock or WTC 7 was a CD, but you [all] just ignore them or write them off as 'kooks' and change the subject.

Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider Professors emeritus for structural analysis and construction at ETH.

Anders B[FONT=&quot]örkman, [/FONT][SIZE=-1]M.Sc. Naval Architect and Marine Engineer

Jeff King, MIT engineer
[/SIZE]
[FONT=&quot]Torin Wolf demolitions expert

Danny Jowenko

[/FONT]
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)

Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)

Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.)

Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member, Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers

Michael T. Donly, P.E., structural engineer

William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College

Patriots question WTC7
[FONT=&quot]http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret)[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Col. James R. Uhl, MD, MC, U.S. Army (ret)
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford, U.S. Marine Corps (ret)
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Lt. Col. Paul F. Getty, DDS (ret)
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army[/FONT][FONT=&quot]David L. Griscom, PhD
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Lon J. Waters, PhD Mathematics
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Robert David Steele
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Enver Masud, BS EE, MS OR [/FONT][FONT=&quot](Operations Research), PE
[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Joel S. Hirschhorn, BS Metallurgical Engineering, MS Metallurgical Engineering, PhD Materials Engineering [/FONT]

Eight Senior Republican Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 - "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/gen...or_republi.htm

Paul Craig Roberts, PhD, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan

Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George H.W. Bush

Morgan Reynolds, PhD, former Chief Economist of the U.S. Department of Labor under current President George W. Bush

Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald ReaganMary Schiavo, JD, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Transportation under Presidents George H.W. Bush and William Clinton

Mary Schiavo. Appointed under the administration of President George H. W. Bush, Ms. Schiavo served as the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Transportation from 1990 - 1996.

Barbara Honegger, served as Special Assistant to the Chief Domestic Policy Adviser to President Ronald Reagan and as a White House Policy Analyst.

Edward Peck, Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the U.S. State Department. Former U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq

Morton Goulder, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning under Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.

Tuesday February 12, 2008
Richard F. Humenn PE,"Fuel and Planes Alone Did NOT Bring the Towers Down"


The list is long and growing.

Despite claims like:
Architect
The fact is - and you can like it or lump it - that the NIST findings are almost universally supported across the very construction industry professionals who are qualified to understand them.

No one has posted the name of a qualified person who has studied the evidence and the NIST report, and stated publicly that they support the NIST conclusion.

Good point.
 
Chris:
What original research have these people brought to the table?

Anders Börkman, is Heiwa on this forum and refuses to address any of the issues brought forward by any engineers. He writes for children (creepy if you ask me)
 
Last edited:
Good point.

No it isn't. It's a falsehood. There are several engineers, architects, and physicists, for example, who are regular posters here.

Again, you kids out there ... Don't do what LC does, in real life! It's fine (kind of) to post silly, obnoxious, and unproductive things on the internet -- because no one knows who you are (for most of us). But in real life, dealing with family, loved ones, school, work, the customs agents, traffic cops, doctors... Well, just don't do it. You will end up lonely and despised, and probably sick and broke.
 
Chris:
The list has no other way but to grow. Gage does not remove inactive or fake members. This is not a club that pays dues or needs to renew their membership, once you sign your there for life.
 
No it isn't. It's a falsehood. There are several engineers, architects, and physicists, for example, who are regular posters here.

Again, you kids out there ... Don't do what LC does, in real life! It's fine (kind of) to post silly, obnoxious, and unproductive things on the internet -- because no one knows who you are (for most of us). But in real life, dealing with family, loved ones, school, work, the customs agents, traffic cops, doctors... Well, just don't do it. You will end up lonely and despised, and probably sick and broke.

Yes it was a good point.

And you don't know me. In fact it's obvious you're very unsure of what you pretend to know to be fact about a lot of things. It's sad to see that fear and doubt because someone is messing with your indoctrinated beliefs.

Get a grip.
 
LC said: "In fact it's obvious you're very unsure of what you pretend to know to be fact about a lot of things. It's sad to see that fear and doubt because someone is messing with your indoctrinated beliefs."

As I believe Architect said on the previous page, Right back at youse, sport. Your postings are a model for how not to express oneself in society -- that is, in social situations where there are consequences. (As opposed to internet postings, where there are none.)
 
are you the owner of the website? Why should I tell you those names? If the owners of the website were doing their jobs, they would have removed the names when they were told, and bothered to verify those names.
That's just a lame excuse to cover the fact that
YOU DON'T KNOW THE NAMES BECAUSE THE WHOLE THING IS A LIE!
 
LC said: "In fact it's obvious you're very unsure of what you pretend to know to be fact about a lot of things. It's sad to see that fear and doubt because someone is messing with your indoctrinated beliefs."

As I believe Architect said on the previous page, Right back at youse, sport. Your postings are a model for how not to express oneself in society -- that is, in social situations where there are consequences. (As opposed to internet postings, where there are none.)

Don't worry about me I do fine and always have. Christopher7 is doing fine from what I can tell also and did make a good point. In fact the correct response to his post would be to agree like I did or post some expert quotes from your so-called vast consensus on the official conspiracy theory.

You also have a third choice...

shhhhhhhhhh
 
You are asking others to do your research, Pdoh... Whoops! I mean, LC. (Sorry, jeez, but you keep slipping with those Britishisms...) The extra quotes are in published books, in posts by many Jrefers, and in NIST and other reports. You simply choose to ignore them. If you cannot find them it only reflects your own incompetence. Sorry, guy.
 
You are asking others to do your research, Pdoh... Whoops! I mean, LC. (Sorry, jeez, but you keep slipping with those Britishisms...) The extra quotes are in published books, in posts by many Jrefers, and in NIST and other reports. You simply choose to ignore them. If you cannot find them it only reflects your own incompetence. Sorry, guy.

Oh what's the matter are you getting shamed in yet another thread? You gonna start calling names now and try to get it moved to AAH to hide your failure yet again? So sad and pathetic. I'll leave you alone now I feel bad.
 
As I believe Architect said on the previous page, Right back at youse, sport. Your postings are a model for how not to express oneself in society -- that is, in social situations where there are consequences. (As opposed to internet postings, where there are none.)
Architect dodged the question, as you have.

No one has posted the name of a qualified person who has studied the evidence and the NIST report, and stated publicly that they support the NIST conclusion.
 

Back
Top Bottom