How does this alleged money-making make the Holocaust less credible? Evidence was evidence, last time I checked.
Faked evidence used to support a hoax like the holocaust, and make money off of it is wrong.
How does this alleged money-making make the Holocaust less credible? Evidence was evidence, last time I checked.
Faked evidence used to support a hoax like the holocaust, and make money off of it is wrong.
Faked evidence used to support a hoax like the holocaust, and make money off of it is wrong.
One crazy woman lied so the millions of other real testimonies are also fake?
There was also the case of Binjamin Wilkomirski some years ago in Switzerland. An article at the Dutch skeptics site explains more in detail, how he had a psychotherapist friend who helped him refind his "repressed" childhood memories. From this article:This is not an isolated case. There was a case here in Baltimore where a woman was giving lengthy lectures about her experiences in the Holocaust, but it transpired she made it all up. Sometimes it's attention seeking, sometimes pathological. It does not lend any credence to Holocaust denial, anymore than made up stories told by soldiers lend credence to a non-existant World War II.
In 1979 Wilkomirski met an Israeli psychologist named Elitsur Bernstein who had been practicing in Zurich for twenty years. With Bernstein, Wilkomirski began to work on recovering his "repressed memories."
To support his obsessive historical studies Wilkomirski has apparently amassed a library of more than two thousand books related to the Holocaust. He is expert on most aspects of that history and has read more than his share of survivors' autobiographical narratives. What seems to have happened is that in creating his own autobiographical narrative Wilkomirski retained the emotional traumas that lie at the heart of his emotional dissociation, but substituted for the actual events of his early childhood events drawn from the history of the Jews in the Holocaust, a subject on which he has apparently brooded for more than thirty years.
A Belgian writer has admitted that she made up her best-selling "memoir" depicting how, as a Jewish child, she lived with a pack of wolves in the woods during the Holocaust, her lawyers said Friday.
No, I do not see the relevance at all. Those that see race and creed and define race and creed are by definition racist.
There is about a much evidence for the Holocaust as there is for the existence of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (the supposed 32nd president). You see the myth of FDR was created by a secret paramilitary group called the March of Dimes. To make school kids believe that FDR was a real person they had his face put on the dime. The March of Dimes is a secret front group that pretends to be interested in the health of children but actually is only interested in fatting them up for the slaughter, since they are run by a satanic cannibals inspired by their founder Johnathon Swift. In Johnathon Swift's manifesto ("A Modest Proposal") he details how the eating of infant flesh is economically viable. Oh and the phone company was involved also, since you needed all those dimes to operate pay phones (once this was exposed they quickly switched to quarters).
So anyone you know who claims to remember, seen, or even voted for FDR is just a shill.
LLH
"Eleanor" was a plant- it was actually Hoover in a dress.How about Eleanor?
May I ask what other major events in recent history may also be hoaxes (of one kind or another) by your estimation? Specifically, 9/11 and the Apollo lunar landings?Faked evidence used to support a hoax like the holocaust, and make money off of it is wrong.
All those sources in German (heaven knows the Germans produce paperwork)
Faked evidence used to support a hoax like the holocaust, and make money off of it is wrong.