[Merged]All religions are idiocy

I think that your religion comprises of your core beliefs and values pertaining to the world and your place in it that effect the way you live your life. For me, Agnostic Zen Humanism is my religion. I don't think belief in the existence of a god determines whether or not something is a religion.
 
Yes, in any form at all.

Name one.

I mean believing in any form of god. Which is of course idiocy.

A religion with no god? How about Taoism, or Buddhism?

I don't understand why you think it is idiocy to believe in something when the benefit derived from doing so outweighs the costs?
 
Hmm, so you appear to be more concerned with theism than religion. Got it. It would have been helpful if you had worded your OP to indicate such.
Its the same thing, so I don't understand your concern.
BTW, many practicing Shinto priests would be very surprised to find out they are not religious by your definition, as would many practicing animists . . .
I would be surprised too as they are included. And in what sense do you feel they don't belive in some form of god?
ETA: OK, Ryokan beat me to it this time.
Beat you to what?
 
I think that your religion comprises of your core beliefs and values pertaining to the world and your place in it that effect the way you live your life. For me, Agnostic Zen Humanism is my religion. I don't think belief in the existence of a god determines whether or not something is a religion.
It does in this thread.
 
Well, I'm a Buddhist. Thank you for calling me an idiot...

He's calling religion idiotic. That doesn't mean he's calling you an idiot.

Oops. I spoke too soon.

I'm of the opinion that religion is idiotic while the religious can be intelligent.
 
Last edited:
Never? Are you saying that there is no possibility that for some person somewhere, believing in god is a net positive for their mental state?
No, that might be possible. His(her) belief would still be pure idiocy, of course.
 
No, that might be possible. His(her) belief would still be pure idiocy, of course.

I see, this is semantic. I thought you were using the word idiocy because you really didn't understand why someone would believe, but now I see it is just used as an insult.
 
I see, this is semantic. I thought you were using the word idiocy because you really didn't understand why someone would believe, but now I see it is just used as an insult.
Whether it is idiotic or not has little to do with whether it would be "a net positive for their mental state" or not.

It is idiotic, period.
 
Its the same thing, so I don't understand your concern.


To you, maybe. To them, unlikely.

I would be surprised too as they are included. And in what sense do you feel they don't belive in some form of god?


In the sense that kami translates more to spirit than god.

Beat you to what?


Pointing out that you are redefining religion to suit yourself.
 
To you, maybe. To them, unlikely.
Let them explain the subtle difference then.
In the sense that kami translates more to spirit than god.
If this spirit can in some way be reached by humans and can in some way affect their lives, then it is God as I define it in this thread.
Pointing out that you are redefining religion to suit yourself.
I'm defining it as I understand most God believers minimum define it.
 
When you have something relevant to contribute, please do so.

What can be less relevant than starting a post, then calling people idiots. And I thought the Danes were supposed to be a tolerant people.:rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • istockphoto_1282019_cherry_danish.jpg
    istockphoto_1282019_cherry_danish.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 1
  • istockphoto_322430_dynamite.jpg
    istockphoto_322430_dynamite.jpg
    15.8 KB · Views: 1

Back
Top Bottom