Hokulele
Deleterious Slab of Damnation
Maybe you should just get out of the thread![]()
What?! And miss out on yet another chance to redefine "religion"? Not on your life.
Maybe you should just get out of the thread![]()
Yes, in any form at all.
Name one.
I mean believing in any form of god. Which is of course idiocy.
If you are an atheist you are not religious. So what is your beef?
I want them to explain, yes. Whether they are insulted or not isn't relevant.
Its the same thing, so I don't understand your concern.Hmm, so you appear to be more concerned with theism than religion. Got it. It would have been helpful if you had worded your OP to indicate such.
I would be surprised too as they are included. And in what sense do you feel they don't belive in some form of god?BTW, many practicing Shinto priests would be very surprised to find out they are not religious by your definition, as would many practicing animists . . .
Beat you to what?ETA: OK, Ryokan beat me to it this time.
And I have never understood why believers are believers. I hope they can explain here.
It does in this thread.I think that your religion comprises of your core beliefs and values pertaining to the world and your place in it that effect the way you live your life. For me, Agnostic Zen Humanism is my religion. I don't think belief in the existence of a god determines whether or not something is a religion.
Well, I'm a Buddhist. Thank you for calling me an idiot...
Yes, there are several.A religion with no god? How about Taoism, or Buddhism?
It never does, so that was an easy question.I don't understand why you think it is idiocy to believe in something when the benefit derived from doing so outweighs the costs?
It does in this thread.
I hope they will too.Well, after the OP, I'm sure they will be just tickled to explain.
Where have I changed definitions?If you can change definitions to whatever suits you, then discussion is pointless.
You too.Danes and Norwegians should really be in bed right now. Have a good night.
Yes, there are several.
It never does, so that was an easy question.
No, that might be possible. His(her) belief would still be pure idiocy, of course.Never? Are you saying that there is no possibility that for some person somewhere, believing in god is a net positive for their mental state?
No, that might be possible. His(her) belief would still be pure idiocy, of course.
Whether it is idiotic or not has little to do with whether it would be "a net positive for their mental state" or not.I see, this is semantic. I thought you were using the word idiocy because you really didn't understand why someone would believe, but now I see it is just used as an insult.
Its the same thing, so I don't understand your concern.
I would be surprised too as they are included. And in what sense do you feel they don't belive in some form of god?
Beat you to what?
Let them explain the subtle difference then.To you, maybe. To them, unlikely.
If this spirit can in some way be reached by humans and can in some way affect their lives, then it is God as I define it in this thread.In the sense that kami translates more to spirit than god.
I'm defining it as I understand most God believers minimum define it.Pointing out that you are redefining religion to suit yourself.
When you have something relevant to contribute, please do so.