Skibum
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2006
- Messages
- 1,659
The police will take care of protecting them, that's their job.
If that's the case, every cop on the planet is an almost complete failure.
Last edited:
The police will take care of protecting them, that's their job.
Man, I hear you! When I went to NIU in the late 80's (graduated in '90) those train tracks were the suicide method of choice for several students. The running sick joke at the time was that NIU students died in strange ways. Besides the obvious suicides on the train tracks, there were several others killed walking on them going home from the downtown bars (those freight trains go through DeKalb at very high speed). It seemed several would also die every year choking on their own vomit after drinking too much. We had one guy steal a glass from a bar (McCabe's, long since closed), slipped on the ice on the sidewalk, the glass broke and severed an artery in his leg and he bled to death. I was also acquainted with 2 guys who were tripping on LSD one night, and for some reason decided to see who could stand closest to the train going by. The "winner" was beheaded by a ladder attached to one of the cars.In the depths of winter in Dekalb, it is a depressing place. Theres just something about that town, which doesn't lend itself well to positive mental health. Last year, someone committed suicide on the train tracks behind my apartment.
The fourth, according to the BBC.
The problem is clearly identifying dangerous people before hand.
From your admission in this thread, it would seem that you are not stable enough to be considered a safe person to own guns for example.
That is going by the VT shootings and the shooter their having issues with depression and suicidal thoughts in the past.
I'm not talking about a ban, but a very strict registry. We have one in Canada, but I think it should be more strict and include all kinds of guns, because obviously it failed us again.
I don't see what's the fascination with having a gun in the house. Civilians should do what they are supposed to do, live their lives instead of playing cowboys and indians. The police will take care of protecting them, that's their job.
Hi
May I ask how a registry helps identify people who are likely to go off their meds and jackassulate?
Actually, in the US, the police are there to enforce the law and have no specific duty to protect the people. There just aren't enough of them.
...and, actually, the ones who DO play Cowboys and Indians have a very low rate of gun crime and accidental shootings. I suspect it's because if they screw up on the society's safety regulations, they don't get to play, and if they screw up on the state and federal gun laws, they don't get to have the guns at all.
Thank you. And thank you for your service.We would like to think that the average citizen has little to fear from home invasion, serial rapists, and drug-addicted burglars who may react violently if discovered, but the fact remains that all these things happen, and they happen more frequently in some areas of the country.
Forgive citizens who feel a little more secure with a defensive weapon in their home.
How many of these mass killings have been interrupted by police?
Thank you. And thank you for your service.
...
Not really. Here is the application for a Firearms Owners Identification Card here in Illinois. Note question #3 "In the past 5 years, have you been a patient in any medical facility or part of any medical facility used primarily for the care or treatment of persons for mental illness?".Apparently this guy was on medication and all four guns he used were legal and licensed to him.
We do a fair-to-middlin' job of finding and arresting criminals after the fact, but that does little to protect the victim.
How many of these mass killings have been interrupted by police?
Given that even studies done by pro-gun researchers have shown that people who live in homes where there is a gun are more likely to be homicide victims than people who live in homes where there not a gun (not to mention the accidental deaths), people who feel think that they are safer having a gun are living in a fantasy world.We would like to think that the average citizen has little to fear from home invasion, serial rapists, and drug-addicted burglars who may react violently if discovered, but the fact remains that all these things happen, and they happen more frequently in some areas of the country.
Forgive citizens who feel a little more secure with a defensive weapon in their home.
Hi
May I ask how a registry helps identify people who are likely to go off their meds and jackassulate?
What about "to serve and protect"? Isn't that their credo?Actually, in the US, the police are there to enforce the law and have no specific duty to protect the people.
I'm just saying people are trained to do certain things. Pro guns proponents seem to think they are supermen: during a shoot out they think they could spot the bad guy and take him out. To me that's absurd. You need training to do that, and even then nobody is immune to mistakes. Having a gun of your own doesn't make you safer, IMO it makes things even worse, it makes things even more unpredictable. It multiplies the possibility of something going wrong by a hundred....and, actually, the ones who DO play Cowboys and Indians have a very low rate of gun crime and accidental shootings. I suspect it's because if they screw up on the society's safety regulations, they don't get to play, and if they screw up on the state and federal gun laws, they don't get to have the guns at all.
Not really. Here is the application for a Firearms Owners Identification Card here in Illinois. Note question #3 "In the past 5 years, have you been a patient in any medical facility or part of any medical facility used primarily for the care or treatment of persons for mental illness?".
Problem is, medical privacy laws prevent this from actually being checked on. This needs to change! I don't think the honor system is adequate in this case.
eta: Illinois does not license or register firearms, just the owners.
Man, I hear you! When I went to NIU in the late 80's (graduated in '90) those train tracks were the suicide method of choice for several students. The running sick joke ...onto the street below.
I don't know what it is about that place, but I did have a good time there!
Him getting shot after killing one person rather than shooting until he got bored and offed himself? Yes, I'd consider someone else with a gun in that situation "essential."According to the Yahoo news report he was considered a good student and a generally OK guy. It would appear that something flipped his switch.
There are a large number of guns in circulation in the US but invariably these shootings are ended by the shooter taking his or her own life. Does the argument "guns are essential to stop this sort of thing" really hold water?
It will be interesting to see what the background of this guy was. These types of things are usually the end result of a long string of ignored warning signs.
This is done. See my last post, that information is verified by the state police. Except medical records...It won't. It would certainly make it a little more difficult for them to obtain arms, especially if their background is being checked.
The old - 'you only know what you read in papers' - appears again. I had missed its presence for a while. Glad to see it is still alive and providing general hilarity.You only know what you read in the papers. Your problem is that you are focusing on an event in a location you don't associate with any danger, a college campus. Multiple murders happen each week in major cities.
Your silence on that appears to be callousness. No, it doesn't, it's a matter of staring at a spike.
I'll remind you that 30,000,000 lawful gun owners didn't kill anyone yesterday. Your draconian approach is noted, and is consigned to the same dustbin as draconian drug laws that do no good.
DR