How To Be A Global Warming Sceptic

[DanishDynamite]

The best way to be a CO2 Warming skeptic is to see if alternative explanations for the warming might be possible. I found this article interesting, for example.

 

[TrueSceptic]

Science is irrelevant.

Okay, have fun popping your bubbles.

Science is not what this thread is about. It is about claims about a particular science.

Do GW "sceptics" make the claims I listed or not?

Stop trying to derail the topic.

 

[TrueSceptic]

The best way to be a CO2 Warming skeptic is to see if alternative explanations for the warming might be possible. I found this article interesting, for example.

Already in my list, although I don't mention Svensmark by name.

 

[CapelDodger]

Science is irrelevant.

Okay, have fun popping your bubbles.

At least you're relevant to the thread. It is, after all, about the behaviour of people like you, and you've kindly provided an example for all to see.

 

[CapelDodger]

The best way to be a CO2 Warming skeptic is to see if alternative explanations for the warming might be possible. I found this article interesting, for example.

It does tell us something about the Torygraph .

 

[DanishDynamite]

Science is not what this thread is about. It is about claims about a particular science.

Do GW "sceptics" make the claims I listed or not?

Stop trying to derail the topic.

Am I a GW "sceptic"? What exactly is the definition of a GW "sceptic"?

 

[DanishDynamite]

Already in my list, although I don't mention Svensmark by name.

What is already on your list and what might this be a "list" of?

 

[DanishDynamite]

It does tell us something about the Torygraph .

Which bits of the article do you find are not in accordance with the truth?

 

[TrueSceptic]

What is already on your list and what might this be a "list" of?

DD (if I may ), did you not read the OP?

 

[CapelDodger]

Already in my list, although I don't mention Svensmark by name.

Danes, they're are all the same. Turn your back on them for a moment and they're on you like a storm-surge up the Wash.

 

[TrueSceptic]

Which bits of the article do you find are not in accordance with the truth?

I'm not saying the idea is wrong. It's just that it is just speculation at the moment yet some already treat it as proven.

BTW be careful with what you read in newspapers. Always read the original documents if you can.

 

[DanishDynamite]

DD (if I may ), did you not read the OP?

Indeed I did. So you are saying that the many statements you posted regarding GW opinons is your "list"?

I see.

What is the relevance of this "list"?

 

[TrueSceptic]

Danes, they're are all the same. Turn your back on them for a moment and they're on you like a storm-surge up the Wash.

Now, now. This is no time to be xenophobic.

 

[DanishDynamite]

Danes, they're are all the same. Turn your back on them for a moment and they're on you like a storm-surge up the Wash.

Unlike the Welsh who....well, are basically unknown.

 

[DanishDynamite]

I'm not saying the idea is wrong. It's just that it is just speculation at the moment yet some already treat it as proven.

In what sense is it more speculative than CO2 based views?

BTW be careful with what you read in newspapers. Always read the original documents if you can.

Very good advice.

 

[TrueSceptic]

Indeed I did. So you are saying that the many statements you posted regarding GW opinons is your "list"?

I see.

What is the relevance of this "list"?

The relevance is to the standard of debate used by most GW "sceptics". Sorry, I can't make it any more obvious.

 

[CapelDodger]

DD (if I may ), did you not read the OP?

A word from the wise : DD's messing with you. He's a bugger for that. Saying little while leading you up a garden-path of your own assumptions.

Beware Danes. They are ruthless, and have questionable manners.

 

[TrueSceptic]

In what sense is it more speculative than CO2 based views?

Very good advice.

As I tried to explain to mhaze, this thread is not about whether particular claims are true; it is about the fact that GW "sceptics" seem to have multiple beliefs that are often contradictory.

 

[TrueSceptic]

A word from the wise : DD's messing with you. He's a bugger for that. Saying little while leading you up a garden-path of your own assumptions.

Beware Danes. They are ruthless, and have questionable manners.

Oh c'mon. Aren't we all nice, friendly Europeans now?

 

[DanishDynamite]

As I tried to explain to mhaze, this thread is not about whether particular claims are true; it is about the fact that GW "sceptics" seem to have multiple beliefs that are often contradictory.

An utterly uninteresting point then. Sorry I impossed.