Haven't had a chance, will respond to this when I have a chance to watch the video.
Please do have a look at it and tell me what you think about it in terms of what adaptions the world's most northern-living non-human primate has.
Thank you for taking only the first section of my response, and completely ignoring how I finished my thought, to completely and totally distort what I was saying. That's how people on this forum win arguments I suppose? Classy.
Perhaps you only need a reminder though. What I said was I don't think Bigfoot (as we know him - and using that specific terminology) is in Britain, Australia, and Malaysia; I did however say that I believe there could be an unknown primate of some sort (call him Bigfoot if you'd like) in those countries. Thanks again for kindly ignoring that portion.
I certainly didn't distort what you said. What do you call it when people in the U.K., Australia, Malaysia report seeing the same type of thing as is what is claimed as being seen in North America? Please do keep in mind the sheer range of descriptions in bigfoot sightings in North America.
Having now established that the first problem was merely your own inaptitude for reading comprehension, I stated that Bigfoot is migratory. Assuming an animal has lived in a freezing environment for millennia (North-Eastern Asia), came over the land-bridge, continued living in cold conditions in Northern U.S. and Canada, and eventually some migrated further south, any rational thinker would reason that they would still have hairy breasts.
1) Thunderdome. What evidence do you have that bigfoot is migratory?
2) Patty's boobs. Watch the video I posted already. Hirsute cans are just one of Patty's ridiculous boobs problems. Don't ignore the completely wrong placement, shape, and rigidity.
Again Bigfoot is migratory. 'Speaking of hairy breasts', I do not know how many reports from down South mention them (either way), so you cannot make a claim one way or another. I am justifying the hairy breasts of Patty, not a separate reference. To be fair, neither you nor I have seen clear pictures of the breasts from a female Bigfoot down South, so your argument is unsound.
I asked you about what percentage of bigfoot reports mention breasts. In general.
You're right, we are starting to see a pattern here. Namely, your inability to see past your own beliefs, and to grasp and critically think through someone else's ideas.
Please tell me what beliefs of mine I'm unable to see past.
I think the majority of Bigfoot are in remote pockets of Canada because that is where they have lived since crossing over.
Thunderdome. You know, it's pretty inevitable with bigfoot enthusiasts to constantly have these opinion-as-fact statements.
No, that's not where the majority of Bigfoot reports are coming from, and maybe you just led into a good point. If there were more contact with those remote areas, then perhaps we'd see and read about more Bigfoot sightings. But then again, that would make the place not-so-remote wouldn't it?
You don't quite seem to have a grasp on the phenomenom. You are one of those bigfoot enthusiasts who clings on to the 'remote' fallacy. Bigfoot is reported from Alaska to Iowa to Texas to New York to Florida. We have a member here that claims they pick through his trash and comes into his home and uses a screwdriver to break into his cans of beans. We have a member here that claimed to see one from his balcony in Georgia and another white one in front of a residence on a highway in an unwooded area in Mississippi.
"What's wrong with Florida?" - Nothing is wrong with Florida, relevance? I already discussed migration and the potential for different varieties of unknown primates (you can call all unknown primates Bigfoot if you'd like - including those in Malaysia, Australia, etc). Again you're getting into a terminology issue where I think our minds diverge. When you say Bigfoot you mean all unknown primates world-wide. When I say Bigfoot I don't mean that.
Based on an absence of reliable evidence I think the best terminology for when people in the U.K., Australia, North America and many other places report seeing giant 8ft bipedal primates is 'social construct'
"What about all those reports?" - What about them?
So you don't have a problem with the complete lack of any reliable evidence whatsoever for giant 8ft bipedal primate reported all across North America?
"What about creekfreak?" - What about it?
That would be the handle of the guy who claims bigfoot picks through his trash and raid his canned beans. Don't believe him? If not, I'd love to hear why. On top of that I'd love to hear one report that you do believe.
"How do you know that bigfoots have specifically adapted to cold climates?" - I don't know 100%, nor do you, but if you're asking why i BELIEVE this, then please refer back to where I discussed them living in the cold, mountanous North-Eastern Asia for thousands of years and migrating over just like the humans and other animals did.
But you do know that bigfoots are migratory and live in remote pockets of Canada. I mean, you did state that as fact.
