TruthMove 2008 Declaration - Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth

boloboffin

Unregistered
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
4,986
Behold, the International Truth Movement's 2008 Declaration: Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth!

We aim to foster reason and responsibility within the global movement for truth. We base this in the following values:


  1. Awareness of public perception and the need for strategic and responsible promotion and presentation.
  2. A commitment to building credibility and encouraging constructive alliances with the anti-war movement and other natural allies.
  3. Adherence to the scientific method and journalistic standards, with a focus on facts, substance, and sources.
  4. A dedication to rational, respectful, and nonviolent debate and activism. Fundamental respect in discourse with all individuals, including those within the government and military, journalists, and supposed “opponents.”
  5. A faith in the honest democratic process and our ability to come to meaningful and actionable conclusions (truths).
  6. Motivations based in compassion, justice, and truth.

Conversely, we seek to counteract and minimize:

  1. Promotion of speculative and unsubstantiated claims.
  2. Disruptive, divisive, diversionary, and aggressive behavior.
  3. Damaging and marginalizing associations.
  4. Organized and intentional sabotage.
  5. Highly partisan representations of the movement.
  6. Motivations based on ego, hatred, and belittlement.

We will engage others in the movement who break these guidelines with constructive dialog, raising awareness of these issues. Those who are unresponsive to reason and have a clear history of disruption, combativeness, or excessively poor judgment will not be engaged.

We recognize an important distinction between private speculation and public promotion. Speculation, hypothesis, and experimentation are the basis of the scientific method. However, the promotion of highly speculative claims is irresponsible and damaging to our credibility. Instead, verifiable fact-based research must be primary in our search for and promotion of the truth.

Lots more at the link, including the "Go ahead and believe this if you wanna but shaddup in public about it" list of unapproved CTs. See if your fav made the list!
 
How long before the guy who wrote that is accused of being a government shill trying to derail the Truth with subtle disinfo?
 
TruthMove consists of two guys and a banner. The revolution will probably have to wait.


Conversely, we seek to counteract and minimize:
  1. Promotion of speculative and unsubstantiated claims.
Yeah. Check their 9/11 "11 Things You Should Know" list, all of which I corrected for them over a year ago. What douchebags.

When I saw them 6 months later and asked why all this false information was still on their flyers (although they agreed some of it was wrong), the leader, Jules, told me that they had already printed a lot up.

"Oh, so it's okay to hand out lies at Ground Zero if you have a lot of them."
"We're not talking to you."
 
Last edited:
This cracks me up, they state this as a guideline:

Avoid the divisive labeling of individuals and groups (i.e. MIHOP, LIHOP, Shill, planehugger, agent, etc.)
But then add this only two bullett points later:


Be aware and vigilant concerning the presence of agent provocateurs within the movement.

We know the government shills are there, but be nice and don't call them that!
 
#3. Adherence to the scientific method and journalistic standards, with a focus on facts, substance, and sources.

This should have been at the top of their list. I wonder why it isn't... hmm :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Awesome...

We aim to foster reason and responsibility within the global movement for truth. We base this in the following values:

1. Awareness of public perception and the need for strategic and responsible promotion and presentation. (disown webster tarpley, Jim Fetzer, Judy Wood, and Kevin Barrett)
2. A commitment to building credibility and encouraging constructive alliances with the anti-war movement and other natural allies. (beg to be part of "real" movements)
3. Adherence to the scientific method and journalistic standards, with a focus on facts, substance, and sources. (dump all work by S.Jones, PFT, and Pentacon)
4. A dedication to rational, respectful, and nonviolent debate and activism. (seeya Mark Dice, Jackchit, Kevin Barrett, etc...) Fundamental respect in discourse with all individuals, including those within the government and military, journalists, and supposed “opponents.” (I guess no more "Young Angry Boy" attitude).
5. A faith in the honest democratic process and our ability to come to meaningful and actionable conclusions (truths). (So Ron Paul is not the only non NWO Shill running???)
6. Motivations based in compassion, justice, and truth. (As long as it fits into our skewed world view).

My comments in bolded italics for flavor...

TAM:)
 
We aim to foster reason and responsibility within the global movement for truth. We base this in the following values:

1. Awareness of public perception and the need for strategic and responsible promotion and presentation.

Future death threats against debunkers to be prefaced with; "We don't want to kill you, but..."
 
Awesome...
Quote:
We aim to foster reason and responsibility within the global movement for truth. We base this in the following values:

1. Awareness of public perception and the need for strategic and responsible promotion and presentation. (disown webster tarpley, Jim Fetzer, Judy Wood, and Kevin Barrett)
2. A commitment to building credibility and encouraging constructive alliances with the anti-war movement and other natural allies. (beg to be part of "real" movements)
3. Adherence to the scientific method and journalistic standards, with a focus on facts, substance, and sources. (dump all work by S.Jones, PFT, and Pentacon)
4. A dedication to rational, respectful, and nonviolent debate and activism. (seeya Mark Dice, Jackchit, Kevin Barrett, etc...) Fundamental respect in discourse with all individuals, including those within the government and military, journalists, and supposed “opponents.” (I guess no more "Young Angry Boy" attitude).
5. A faith in the honest democratic process and our ability to come to meaningful and actionable conclusions (truths). (So Ron Paul is not the only non NWO Shill running???)
6. Motivations based in compassion, justice, and truth. (As long as it fits into our skewed world view).



My comments in bolded italics for flavor...

TAM:)

If they took your suggestions to heart, they would be minimized right out of existence! :D
 

Back
Top Bottom