Brand New CT sub-group: No-Sounders

[LastChild]

Irrelevant. The helicopter was quite audible on the WTC tapes and that was higher than the WTC, so any demo charges would certainly been heard if they existed.

To prove your point, you will have to find a single cd where the demo charges are not audible, but other ambient sounds are.

So far you have been completely unable to do that.

FAIL etc etc.

Sounds like people closer to the microphone are more ambient then demolition charges I showed in the Dallas demolition and from different angles and it was without 110 stories collapsing at the same time which is what Gravy compares his CD's to.

I get shown here a movie with molten metal pouring out of the side of the wtc which isn't even in Gravy's piece of crap movie and I'm told that their should have been demolition charges heard before the collapse initiation. Yeah right.

That's some debunking.

YOU FAIL AGAIN AGAIN and AGAIN

 

[Myriad]

Got one 110 stories? I've already addressed this.

You have made all kinds of special pleading arguments, but you have not supported your argument against the point made by Gravy's video in the one way that would be convincing, which is by referencing an audiovisual recording of a known controlled demolition in which background sounds are recorded throughout, and the sound of the collapse is audible, but the sounds of the explosive charges going off cannot be heard.

It's fine with me if the video you reference is recorded from a distance of 110 stories (about 400 meters) or considerably greater. I suspect you'll find that the vast majority of audiovisual recordings of CDs are.

Each and every time you have posted in response to my challenge you have failed miserably. It's getting to be a real habit with you. But you're not alone so don't feel bad. After all that's what debunking here at JREF is all about. Supporting each others delusions and keeping up the denial.

I have no interest in your challenge. The only claim I am making is that your evidence supporting your claim is lacking, because you have failed to exhibit the one type of evidence that would matter, which is an audiovisual recording of a known controlled demolition in which background sounds are recorded throughout, and the sound of the collapse is audible, but the sounds of the explosive charges going off cannot be heard. Your challenge is irrelevant to my claim.

Oh yeah you have [failed] and miserably. Sorry.

There's no need to apologize, because your opinion on that is irrelevant to begin with. The arguments are there for anyone to read, and decide for themselves what makes sense and what does not.

What makes sense is that if your claim were true that CD charges were used in the towers on 9/11 without microphones recording their sounds due to background noise and the sound of the building collapsing, then you should be able to exhibit audiovisual recordings of known controlled demolitions in which background sounds are recorded throughout, and the sound of the collapse is audible, but the sounds of the explosive charges going off cannot be heard.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[Myriad]

Sounds like people closer to the microphone are more ambient then demolition charges I showed in the Dallas demolition and from different angles and it was without 110 stories collapsing at the same time which is what Gravy compares his CD's to.

While you're looking for those audiovisual recordings of known controlled demolitions in which background sounds are recorded throughout, and the sound of the collapse is audible, but the sounds of the explosive charges going off cannot be heard -- you might also, along the way, want to look up what the word "ambient" means.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[Jonnyclueless]

While you're looking for those audiovisual recordings of known controlled demolitions in which background sounds are recorded throughout, and the sound of the collapse is audible, but the sounds of the explosive charges going off cannot be heard -- you might also, along the way, want to look up what the word "ambient" means.

Respectfully,
Myriad

This point has been brought up at least 100 times now. He just isn't going to get it.

 

[Myriad]

This point has been brought up at least 100 times now. He just isn't going to get it.

True. In fact I believed I just recently likened his chance of getting it to the chance of my teaching my dogs to fly.

But that's not my reason for posting it.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[gumboot]

Oh really? LOL

What should it have sounded like?

The explosion should have clipped at the same level as the fireman's voice.

-Gumboot

 

[Brainache]

The explosion should have clipped at the same level as the fireman's voice.

-Gumboot

[ nutjob] LOL! What level was that, Mr Failey McFailure?[/nutjob]

 

[DGM]

LastChild:

So you still have nothing? You really need to see a CD in person if your going to argue my first hand knowledge. So can you justify your opinion or are you just blowing smoke?

Your fail has reached epic proportions!!!!!!!!

 

[DGM]

LastChild:
The towers like the smaller buildings only dropped one floor at a time. 110 times, not louder just longer.

YOU FAIL

 

[LastChild]

The explosion should have clipped at the same level as the fireman's voice.

-Gumboot

Where is that self proclaimed audio expert when you need him? I don't even remember his name but he likes to post lots of pictures and links to his own nonsense as evidence. Anyway I think you and him have a disagreement.

LOL

 

[LastChild]

LastChild:
The towers like the smaller buildings only dropped one floor at a time. 110 times, not louder just longer.

YOU FAIL

Yeah then they stopped right there in mid-air right? I guess a collapsing dog house would make the same sound as a collapsing 110 story skyscraper too. Got anymore scary evidence like that?

YOU REALLY FAIL
LOL

 

[KoihimeNakamura]

Guys. Just put him on ignore, and let him fail in silence. This thread has gone on too long and he's just going to ignore any points against him and replace him with his realitiy's rules and wrong counterarguments.

c.

 

[DGM]

Yeah then they stopped right there in mid-air right? I guess a collapsing dog house would make the same sound as a collapsing 110 story skyscraper too. Got anymore scary evidence like that?

YOU REALLY FAIL
LOL

Who said anything about stopping? It just takes longer.

If your dog house is the size of the buildings you posted. Yes.

Do you have any thing besides your opinion that the explosives would be drowned out?

Until you can justify your assertion your a no starter. I suggest you get working on that. Your not looking too good here.

 

[LastChild]

Who said anything about stopping? It just takes longer.

If your dog house is the size of the buildings you posted. Yes.

Do you have any thing besides your opinion that the explosives would be drowned out?

Until you can justify your assertion your a no starter. I suggest you get working on that. Your not looking too good here.

So size does matter?

LOL

At what point does it start mattering at at what point does it stop?

I'm just curiuous as to what you have to claim.

It's entertaining.

BUT IT STILL FAILS

 

[DGM]

So size does matter?

LOL

At what point does it start mattering at at what point does it stop?

I'm just curiuous as to what you have to claim.

It's entertaining.

BUT IT STILL FAILS

How could I possibly fail? I'm just pointing out where you don't back up your statement. I have experience, what do you have? Nothing!!!!!

Are you planning on backing up your assertion at any time soon? Until then you are a non-starting failure. You need to start to accept that to be your future.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

DGM

He doesn't get it. Don't waste your time. He will never understand. Even if you point out his mistakes, he will not understand. Even when you prove him wrong, he will not understand. This is a person who thinks the explosives were covered up by the sound of the collapse (I know I know, don't get me started with how idiotic that notion is). But save your breath for a real discussion that might bear some fruit. Otherwise it's like trying to convince someone that 2+2=4 while they insist it's 5.

 

[DGM]

DGM

He doesn't get it. Don't waste your time. He will never understand. Even if you point out his mistakes, he will not understand. Even when you prove him wrong, he will not understand. This is a person who thinks the explosives were covered up by the sound of the collapse (I know I know, don't get me started with how idiotic that notion is). But save your breath for a real discussion that might bear some fruit. Otherwise it's like trying to convince someone that 2+2=4 while they insist it's 5.

I really couldn't careless what he thinks. I'm just having fun screwing with him. It's fun watching him jump the rails.

 

[1337m4n]

He doesn't understand. Explain as you would a child.

 

[DGM]

[qimg]http://www.movievillains.com/images/sarris.jpg[/qimg]

He doesn't understand. Explain as you would a child.

It's worse than that, he doesn't want to understand.

 

[gumboot]

Where is that self proclaimed audio expert when you need him? I don't even remember his name but he likes to post lots of pictures and links to his own nonsense as evidence. Anyway I think you and him have a disagreement.

LOL

WTF are you talking about?

-Gumboot