I claim it's not proof. If you agree that it's not proof then why are so many people arguing with me including you.
I offered the same standard of evidence Gravy uses.
This is not true. In fact I have been told here that in CD demolition the charges go off before the building collapses. So I asked then why does gravy compare CD videos to the collapse of the tower already in progress?
Gravy's contention after he implies one audio of the same video is fake and that in the real audio if there were demolition charges they would be heard not only in the Trinity Church video but they would be so loud they would be heard by other audio as well.
I contend not necessarily. The collapse of the building itself was so loud that to decipher one explosive sound from another might not be so cut and dry.
If demolition charges are so loud they would have been picked up loud and clear by many recording devices on 9/11 then I asked this question...
Why in the 9/11 video that I supply of an explosive sound that is just as loud as a demolition charge is there not other recordings of that sound and recorded just as loud anywhere?
Because for one Gravy's videos are cherry picked. I also supplied a controlled demolition from Dallas at different angles where depending on which angle the charges were recorded at different levels. And none of them were as loud as any in gravy's video. In fact the demolition charge sound in one of them couldn't even be heard over the people talking never mind had there been a 110 story building collapsing at the same time.
I’m really just using one conceivable way. And it was conceived by debunkers. How's it taste?
YOU FAIL
Respectfully,
LastChild
There's another post that does not point out an audiovisual recording of a controlled demolition using explosives, in which the audio continuously recorded ambient sounds and the sound of the building collapsing, but failed to record to sound of the demolition charges going off.
That's more evidence supporting Gravy's point. Thanks, LastChild! Keep it coming!
Respectfully,
Myriad