I knew you never bothered to read his work beachnut.
That's okay, it was probably well over your head anyway.
MM
Yes, it was well over my head, I can not breath when the BS is piled so deep.
Please point out the parts that are not BS. I am ready to be impressed with the parts you think are backed by facts.
Now this tremendous jet-fuel explosion failed to remove this aluminum cladding, but later managed to destroy machine rooms, steel fire doors and cause cave-ins, and at the same time leaving the shafts it - officially - emerged from intact, is beyond me. But I#m not a Bush-Scientist, so that could be the reason for my failure to understand.
What is this rant about. Look how scientific he gets. Wow.
The question raises: why should bombs be installed in the basement levels? Though it would make sense in a demolition to set up explosives in the basement levels, where the columns are connected to the ground,
I like his super science on the connected to the ground, very technical stuff. How did he get so smart? Wowzer, zing bing. wow
He is getting over my head, but only in BS, and much too technical for me.
Another thing to be considered is the possibility, that people confuse the odor of kerosine with diesel, which is
similiar to jet-fuel or even with gasoline.
oops, again wowzer on this one. But gasoline, no way you can confuse gasoline with jet fuel. But then you guys at LCF are just too technical for me.
Miragememories , just too tech for me, how do you keep up with the science spewing from NK44?
if you want to bring the towers down in secret, you would have had a great interest to not get the elevators to work again, or to even figure out, which of them would still working .
Over my head again in stupidity. I am not this stupid to make up junk out of the blue after impacts of 1300 and 2200 pounds of TNT occurred. The aircraft knock out major systems, and only idiots use elevators in fires, and you wonder with NK44 how the elevators were knocked out? Too tech for me.
The explosions not only affected the firefighting efforts by disabling the elevators and destroying the Secure Command Center, but also by disabling the Fire Suppression Systems. How were these sytems operating?
Out of his fantasy mind he makes up the explosions to disable elevators, and other stuff. Just say it and it is so. Yes, you guys are too much for my engineering background, and it is true only idiots believe this tripe. This gets funny~! Funnier
NEXT, the smoking guns of smoking guns, the SS acts like it is snowing and skip School! Or was it the large OBJECTS flying all over NYC that makes them act like school is canceled!?
Immediately after the first plane impact the Secret Service completely evacuated their station in WTC 7, its greatest field-office. And later advised the evacuation of the OEM (Office of Emergency Management) in the 23rd floor of WTC 7, and therefore caused additional confusing and hampering regarding the emergency response.
What a dumb LCF thread; it has all sorts of BS, piled with more BS, and then it gets worse. The real CT is how can idiots post so much junk and not one person at LCF is smart enough to raise the BS Flag!? Just too technical for me.
The question then would be how the Secret Service man knew that there couldn't be bombs in the basement if they were under attack by terrorists. The experience of the WTC 93 bombing should have lead to enough caution about the possibility of bombs in the basement. Instead he was quick with an explanation, matching with the later official version, though he hardly could see a fireball travelling down the shafts.
duh, because they were there? Yes, many people who experienced 1993 bombing were in the area on 9/11 and they can tell you it was different. But then your this doltish series of posts is too technical for me, and if it was not so much BS and hearsay, I could understand it since I was dumbed down too much learning to fly supersonic aircraft and earning a masters degree in engineering. Much too technical for me the made up fantasy BS of 9/11 truth and NK44 trivial tripe BS rant.
You are right, I mean wrong, you have to be dumbed down a lot to make anything of this junk. I must not be dumbed down as much as the standard LCF poster needs me to be. Are you?
They all knew ?! And nobody informed Bush when America was under attack !? Instead President Bush was not informed until the attack further succeeded with the second impact. But even then the Secret Service did not make an attempt to pull Bush out of the lesson, though he of course could be a target and they knew that more planes were in the air. Instead, Bush stayed at the school until 9.30, were he gave a scheduled press conference. No need for hurry here. It seems that Secret Service men had more interest to pull some other people out of an area.
Now it gets stupid. Pure junk for no real reason but to rant about things. Much too tech for me.
It was a Secret Controlled Demolition (SCD). A SCD requires a cover legend to make it not look like a demolition. This legend is that the impact damage of the planes and the subsequent fires brought down the towers.
Oh, a secret. Silent secret explosives. Wow
Certainly planting some diesel fuel in the area of the explosives was easy and would only add to the ruse that they were aircraft fuel caused. The eyewitness reports of diesel fuel odor are one of the points constantly raised by skeptics to discount alternative explanations for the explosions that because of so much eyewitness testimony were impossible to deny.
And we have other LCF posters making up lies as it goes on. Wowzer, more BS made up on the fly.
Isn't it interesting, that in WTC2 (South Tower), which only survived 56 minutes after the initial impact, that just a few minutes after firefighters reported that they had reached the 79th floor reporting they had just two easy fires to handle, and before their efforts could reach fires above that level, the building totally collapsed.
More hearsay fact less tripe. Where do you get this stuff from? Small fires, which were seen by all as large fires. Good job misleading and posting a lie if you are saying the WTC tower fires were small. Due to the fact you have only seen 3 examples of 10,000 gallons of fuel starting fires in buildings. Dumbest post yet!
