Yes yes I have a dictionary. I know the traditional definition of what a squib is.
Then why not use the proper terminology?
You seem to have a real problem with loudness.
The problem is yours. Explosives make noise. Powerful explosives make a
really loud noise. You cannot hand waive that basic fact out of existence.
They also have distinct physical effects too, such as the blast wave. You can't hand waive that out of existence either.
Your a one trick pony and you seem to think that the lack of accountability for explosive noise reports means there were no explosives.
You're dancing but not going anywhere. The fact remains: Powerful explosives make a
really loud noise. You cannot hand waive that basic fact out of existence.
They also have distinct physical effects too, such as the blast wave. You can't hand waive that out of existence either.
So tell me how you expect these explosions to evidence themselves in an environment filled with prevailing noise from sirens, debris falls, buildings on fire, and all the other sounds a big city makes during an emergency like 9/11?
Because demolition charges are
VERY LOUD and thus would
easily be heard and recorded above any other noise. Try watching some legitimate videos of controlled demolitions and this basic fact is easily observable. You cannot hand waive it out of existence.
We can't rely on recording devices, though there are recordings of explosions. Microphones set to normal background audio levels are easily overwhelmed by a situation that raises ambient levels as high as they were in lower Manhattan on 9/11.
Are you seriously trying to claim that a very loud noise would magically not be recorded by a microphone? Really? Then might you explain why
the sounds of the jets impacting the tower and exploding were recorded? How come those sounds are present and yet powerful explosives used to demolish a building are not?
The resident audio experts will be along shortly to correct your misunderstanding of how microphones work.
When we do, we get contradictory remembrances, and like the election of 2000, you can probably find more quotes for no explosions than you can for "yes I heard them".
Actually, you get most saying they heard something which sounded
like an explosion. Remember analogies?
This is really a fruitless quest. We have quite a quantity of testimony regarding WTC 1 & 2 for instance that cites a great deal of explosive activity yet that gets ignored here as well.
As has been pointed out around here innumerable times, there were plenty of ordinary things in the WTC buildings which could explode as the buildings collapsed. But none of these are explosive demolition charges, which are something else entirely different, with the physical aspects of them (i.e. loudness of the sound, flashes of light, and blast wave effects) that are NOT present.
You cannot hand waive these basic facts out of existence as much as you would like to.
Well we've all watched thoses numerous videos of buildings that have been brought down by controlled demolitions. One thing I've noticed is that prior to the event, it's usually very quiet. During the event, it's visually spectacular but the explosive sounds are largely muted inside the building since they are focused mostly at ground level near the core.
You either have really bad hearing or you've got the volume turned way down. Also, the explosives go off
BEFORE the building collapses,
NOT during the collapse. After all, it is the detonation of the explosives which causes the collapse. Once the building is collapsing, why would you need any more explosives?
In lower Manhattan we have a wall of noise as a backdrop and a controlled demolition that doesn't want to be advertised as such. I'm suggesting your deafness is a result of background noise, stealth and maximum use of sound deadening controlled demolition technology.
Then explain why
the sound of the aircraft impacting the buildings and exploding were clearly heard by folks in the area and clearly recorded by the many cameras in the area.
So the jets exploding are not masked by other sounds and such but many demolition charges are?
