• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why is homosexuality wrong?

We all know that homosexuality is wrong;
The thing that remains is how they are going to be punished by God.
To be frank I don’t think they’re going to be punished very severely because it’s their own anus.

:):D:)
 
Ali said:
We all know that homosexuality is wrong;
The thing that remains is how they are going to be punished by God.
To be frank I don’t think they’re going to be punished very severely because it’s their own anus.

:):D:)
Click to expand...
No, we have no problem with homosexuality. But we have a problem with small minded people like you that believe in a so-called god that only dislikes things that they dislike with no proof that that so-called small minded god exist outside of a BLACK book and your small feeble mind. I would like to know why you are worried about what goes on in other people's homes. Because we know people like you don't know when to stop putting you nose in other people's asses.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Greatest I am said:

Why then does God discriminate against homosexuals?
It appears to go against His usual justice.
Regards
DL
Click to expand...

God doesn't discriminate against homosexuals. Some God believers believe so.

And some atheists believe so.

Hmm... and some liberal people also.

And yes..... some..... Devoted "Dungeons And Dragons" dude somewhere in the world believes so too.


Are we gonna blame the ideology or the person?
 
Ron_Tomkins said:
God doesn't discriminate against homosexuals. Some God believers believe so.

And some atheists believe so.

Hmm... and some liberal people also.

And yes..... some..... Devoted "Dungeons And Dragons" dude somewhere in the world believes so too.


Are we gonna blame the ideology or the person?
Click to expand...

There's nothing in liberalism, atheism or the Dungeons & Dragons Players' Handbook that suggests adherents should discriminate against homosexuals. That's not true for the Bible, therefore I'd blame the ideology.

Of course, as the tide of changing morality turns against the church, it will eventually soften and then abandon its anti-gay stance, and work out reasons why the book of Leviticus doesn't say what it plainly does say.
 
Terry said:
Actually, no, it isn't. But I already knew that. My point, such as it is, is that people aren't up in arms about eating lobster.
Click to expand...

*hcmom tries to rally some anti-lobster eaters support
 
Ali said:
We all know that homosexuality is wrong;
The thing that remains is how they are going to be punished by God.
To be frank I don’t think they’re going to be punished very severely because it’s their own anus.

:):D:)
Click to expand...

Let me be frank on this subject.

The most intersting thing I can think of in this entire universe is my own orgasim. The most uninteresting thing I can possibly think of, the one thing that I wish not to ever even ponder, is how ANY OTHER GUY GETS OFF.

It is ALL none of my concern . . .

If two consenting adults want to dress up in leather boyscout outfits, beat each other in the privates with ballpin hammers, and take turn blowing the neighbor's cat . . . IT IS NONE OF MY CONCERN. PERIOD

Could care less . . .

And why any one else would is completly beyond me.

I have heard the argument over and over that people have issue with the homosexual lifstyle in how they dress and act, and my question has always been, "Have you taken a good look at some of the hedrosexuals?"

The weirdo's on my side of the fence, (Hedro), far outway the entire population of the world's gay community.

Or maybe the argument is that we already have enough card carrying weirdo's out there and we just don't need more flamers to add to the mix . . .hell I don't know . .

But on the other side of the argument, Gay people need to start policing their own. Some of your more ecentric members seem always to be the ones that are the most "on fire" with the stage make-up, drag queen attire, and copies of Barbra Streisand albums. And these are the guys/girls who want to scream the most that they are being treated badily from society as a whole.

It's time that some of your more conservative leaders tell these people that they aren't helping the cause, in other words, "Climb down off the cross, by God we need the firewood."

I am not saying that people can't act like that if they want to, but someone in charge needs to omit "Roxy's" name from their e-mail list for the public protests.

That's all I am saying.

WooHoo . . .100th post . . . yea. . .thought I would share it with you.
 
May I offer a little perspective?

If a practicing "homosexual" is capable of reproducing through heterosexual means but not homosexual means, wouldn't that make him a heterosexual who chose to deviate from what he is naturally? Isn't that like referring to a dog as a bird because the dog chose to try and fly as if the dog possesed wings? The dog has no wings. The practicing "homosexual" doesn't have "homosexual" genitals. There is no such thing as a true homosexual. This is all made up.
 
Hi Terry,

Terry said:
So I'm just pretending to find guys attractive? How interesting. What else am I deluded about?
Click to expand...

Did I say that you are pretending to find men attractive? I wasn't even addressing attraction. I was addressing the fact that practicing "homosexuals" possess heterosexaul characteristics, namely that your sex organs are designed for procreation through only heterosexual means. That makes you a heterosexual who chooses to deviate from what you are naturally. Call me a skeptic of the claim that there is such a thing as a true homosexual.
 
Craig24 said:
... wouldn't that make him a heterosexual who chose to deviate from what he is naturally? ...
Click to expand...
No. Most homosexuals will tell you the did not choose to be that way. When did you choose to become a heterosexual? Was it tough to do? Did you have to spend days and days going studying the options available to you before choosing, like figuring out which college to go to after high school?

And while we're at it, did you get to choose your hair type? Hair is a good analogy for sexual orientation: you can do a fair bit with your hair, but in the end it's still what nature gave you. Stop cutting and perming and colouring it, and in a few weeks your hair will will return to its "natural" state.
 
Craig24 said:
Did I say that you are pretending to find men attractive? I wasn't even addressing attraction. I was addressing the fact that practicing "homosexuals" possess heterosexaul characteristics, namely that your sex organs are designed for procreation through only heterosexual means. That makes you a heterosexual who chooses to deviate from what you are naturally. Call me a skeptic of the claim that there is such a thing as a true homosexual.
Click to expand...

You are saying that gay men possess heterosexual genitals. That is false. Gay men have male genitals, not heterosexual genitals.

Words have meanings, homosexual describes the state of being primarily or exclusively romantically and sexually attracted to members of one's own gender.

Trust me, there really are people that are homosexual. A true homosexual is a human person that is primarily or exclusively attracted to people of the same gender.

If you wish to invent your own language and call it Craig24ish, good for you, have fun. But in the English language, in UK, American and Australian use of English, the definition of the word homosexual is not the same as in Craig24ish.
 
Hi Blue Mountain,

Blue Mountain said:
No. Most homosexuals will tell you the did not choose to be that way.
Click to expand...

Most "homosexuals" did not choose to be what way? I don't follow. Every professing "homosexual" was born a heterosexual. I know that for a fact because they were born of heterosexual parents through heterosexual means to become a heterosexual capable of reproducing exclusively through heterosexaul means. That makes them a heterosexual. They didn't choose to become a homosexual because nobody can become a homosexaul. There is no such thing. What they are doing is choosing to DEVIATE from what they are in an attempt to become something they are not.

Blue Mountain said:
When did you choose to become a heterosexual? Was it tough to do? Did you have to spend days and days going studying the options available to you before choosing, like figuring out which college to go to after high school?
Click to expand...

Thanks for asking this question but you are helping me to make my point. I never chose to be a heterosexual. I was born a hetersexual. Every professing "homosexual" was also born a heterosexual. They did not, and cannot choose to become a homosexual. Again, there is no such thing.
 
Craig24 said:
Thanks for asking this question but you are helping me to make my point. I never chose to be a heterosexual. I was born a hetersexual. Every professing "homosexual" was also born a heterosexual. They did not, and cannot choose to become a homosexual. Again, there is no such thing.
Click to expand...


I see, homosexuals do not exist. Is there a word in Craig24ish for people that are primarily or exclusively attracted to other persons of the same gender?

This thread could end up becoming the Rosetta Stone for Craig24ish scholars.
 
Ali said:
We all know that homosexuality is wrong;
The thing that remains is how they are going to be punished by God.
To be frank I don’t think they’re going to be punished very severely because it’s their own anus.

:):D:)
Click to expand...

You claim that your god let someone rape a nine year old girl and bury her alive just because she might have disrespected him. So how do you define "severe punishment"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom